Type: Article
Publication Date: 1966-01-01
Citations: 3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-1966-0201616-8
is divergent. Given any e> 0 we may by choosing k large enough ensure that (3) an= O(nl+E). However the series (2) is certainly Abel summable and so the stronger condition (4) an O(n-1) would imply the convergence of (2), by Littlewood's Tauberian theorem. Thus Shapiro's example shows that we cannot weaken (4) to a condition of the form (3) in Littlewood's theorem by making the compensating assumption thatf has bounded variation on [0, 1). In this note we prove a stronger negative result than that of Shapiro. THEOREM. Let d(n) be positive for all positive integers n, and let d(n) T oo as n-> oo. Then there is a function f of the form (1) which is increasing and bounded on [0, 1) and for which (2) is divergent although (5) 1 a.j k2 (k_ 1). Put
Action | Title | Year | Authors |
---|---|---|---|
+ | Theory of summability of sequences and series | 1976 |
G Kangro |
+ | Absolute Abel summability | 1972 |
Rachna Mathur |
+ | Twelve Landmarks of Twentieth-Century Analysis | 2015 |
D. Choimet Hervé Queffélec |
Action | Title | Year | Authors |
---|---|---|---|
+ | A Remark Concerning Littlewoods Tauberian Theorem | 1965 |
H. S. Shapiro |
+ PDF Chat | A remark concerning Littlewood’s Tauberian theorem | 1965 |
H. S. Shapiro |