The homotopy theory of projective modules

Type: Article

Publication Date: 1962-01-01

Citations: 17

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9904-1962-10826-x

Abstract

Serre [8;9] has established the rudiments of a dictionary for translating the language of projective modules into that of vector bundles.With this point of departure we have attempted to adapt some of the results and methods of homotopy theory to certain purely arithmetic and even noncommutative settings.Detailed proofs of our results will appear elsewhere.The authors are very grateful to Albrecht Dold who has educated them on the relevant parts of bundle theory.We first recall briefly the topological setting which our theorems parody.[X, Y] denotes the homotopy classes of maps of X to F. If ƒ: A->B induces homotopy isomorphisms in dimensions Sr and if X is a finite CW complex of dimension ^w, then one shows easily (see [10, Appendix]) that [X, A]->[X, B] is surjective for r^m and injective for r>m.As special cases we have I. [X, Bow]-*[X, Bo(r+i)] is surjective torrent and injective for r>m\ and II.[X, 0(r)]->[X, 0 (r + 1)] is surjective for r^m + 1 and injective for r>m + l.Here Bo( r ) is the classifying space of the orthogonal group 0(r).The classification theorem [ll, §19] says that [X, B 0 ( r )] represents the functor, [(equivalence classes of) real r-plane bundles over X], and then the map in I is obtained by adding a trivial line bundle.Moreover, the argument in [ll, §18] shows that [X, O(r)]/wo(0(r)) represents the functor [real r-plane bundles over SX], where SX is the (reduced) suspension of X.Atiyah and Hirzebruch [l ] define a functor K*(X) = K\X) ®K l (X) as follows: K°(X) is the Grothendieck ring of vector bundles over X. Choosing a base point gives K° an augmentation, and X X (X) is then the augmentation ideal of K°(SX).Thus I and II above define a kind of stable range for K° and K l respectively.Now let R be a commutative ring, X its spectrum of maximal ideals, and À an i^-algebra finitely generated as an jR-module.We require only that X be what might be called a "Zariski complex," i.e. that each closed set be a finite union of irreducible closed sets (see [4, §3]).IfPisa A-module and #GX then P x is the localization of P at x; we say /-rank P^r if P x contains a A^-free direct summand of rank r for all x.Note that P is required to be neither projective nor

Locations

  • Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Vector Bundles and Projective Modules 1962 Richard G. Swan
+ PDF Chat The cohomology of the projective 𝑛-plane 1979 William A. Thedford
+ The real projective spaces in homotopy type theory 2017 Ulrik Buchholtz
Egbert Rijke
+ The real projective spaces in homotopy type theory 2017 Ulrik Buchholtz
Egbert Rijke
+ PDF Chat The real projective spaces in homotopy type theory 2017 Ulrik Buchholtz
Egbert Rijke
+ PDF Chat Vector Bundles and Projective Modules 1986 L. N. Vaserstein
+ The adjunction theory of complex projective varieties 1995 Mauro C. Beltrametti
Andrew J. Sommese
+ PDF Chat Vector bundles and projective modules 1962 Richard G. Swan
+ PDF Chat Topological examples of projective modules 1977 Richard G. Swan
+ PDF Chat Topological Examples of Projective Modules 1977 Richard G. Swan
+ PDF Chat Projective resolutions and Poincaré duality complexes 1994 David J. Benson
Jon Carlson
+ PDF Chat Algebraic geometry of topological spaces I 2012 Guillermo Cortiñas⋆
Andreas Thom
+ Self-homotopy of projective space and L-S category of quasi-projective spaces 2006 敏行 宮内
+ Algebraic Geometry of Topological Spaces I 2009 Guillermo Cortiñas⋆
Andreas Thom
+ Algebraic Geometry of Topological Spaces I 2009 Guillermo Cortiñas⋆
Andreas Thom
+ REAL K-COHOMOLOGY OF COMPLEX PROJECTIVE SPACES 2007 Atsushi Yamaguchi
+ PDF Chat Algebraic vector bundles over real algebraic varieties 1987 M Büchner
Wojciech Kucharz
+ Homotopy Theory of Differential GradedModules and Adjoints of Restriction ofScalars 2014 Mohammad Mahdi Abbasirad
+ Spaces of equivariant algebraic maps from real projective spaces into complex projective spaces 2011 Andrzej Kozłowski
Kohhei Yamaguchi
+ Which Functor Is the Projective Line? 2003 Daniel K. Biss