Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2009-08-18

Citations: 24604

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

Locations

  • Annals of Internal Medicine - View
  • PubMed - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ Checklist: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies 2023 Mukesh Kumar Sinha
+ Strobe-M Quality Rating Sheet For Observational Studies 2017 Limaye Dnyanesh
+ Strobe-M Quality Rating Sheet For Observational Studies 2017 Limaye Dnyanesh
+ PDF Chat Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Research Studies 2007 Katrin Uhlig
Vandana Menon
Christopher H. Schmid
+ Reporting of Effect Size and Confidence Intervals: Review and Methods of Calculation 2014 Martin R. Vasilev
+ Randomized, Controlled Trials 2006 Robin S. McLeod
+ Updated Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT): it just gets better 2010 Maarten Boers
+ Les essais de taille 1 en recherche clinique : état des lieux et perspectives 2014 Myriam Mouhib
+ PDF Chat Handbook of Statistical Methods for Randomized Controlled Trials, 1st ed.Edited by KyungMann Kim, Frank Bretz, Ying Kuen K. Cheung, Lisa V. Hampson, New York: Chapman &amp; Hall, 2023, 654 pp., £47.99 (paperback), ISBN 9781032009100 <b>Handbook of Statistical Methods for Randomized Controlled Trials, 1st ed.</b> Edited by KyungMann Kim, Frank Bretz, Ying Kuen K. Cheung, Lisa V. Hampson, New York: Chapman &amp; Hall, 2023, 654 pp., £47.99 (paperback), ISBN 9781032009100 2024 Tri Astari
Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo
Fery Muhamad Firdaus
+ Letsch et al. 2016 Studyprotocol - Systematic Review 2017 Harald Baumeister
+ MiRoR7-P1- Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design 2020 Lorenzo Bertizzolo
Ignacio Atal
Agnès Dechartres
Patrick M. Bossuyt
+ MiRoR7-P1- Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design 2020 Lorenzo Bertizzolo
Ignacio Atal
Agnès Dechartres
Patrick M. Bossuyt
+ MiRoR7-P1- Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design 2020 Lorenzo Bertizzolo
Ignacio Atal
Agnès Dechartres
Patrick M. Bossuyt
+ PDF Chat Adherence to review protocol and rigorous methodology are the pre-requisites of a well-conducted systematic review 2019 Sagiri Taguchi
Miyako Funabiki
Yoshitaka Nakamura
+ How to assess publication bias: funnel plot, trim-and-fill method and selection models 2014 Dimitris Mavridis
Georgia Salanti
+ PDF Chat Reporting guidance considerations from a statistical perspective: overview of tools to enhance the rigour of reporting of randomised trials and systematic reviews 2017 Brian Hutton
Dianna Wolfe
David Moher
Larissa Shamseer
+ PDF Chat The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials 2003 David Moher
Kenneth F. Schulz
Douglas G. Altman
+ Randomized controlled trials 2020 Sube Banerjee
Rod S Taylor
Jennifer Hellier
+ Combined background information for meta-analysis evaluation 2018 S. Stanley Young
Warren B. Kindzierski
+ PDF Chat <i>Correction: Interpretation of CIs in clinical trials with non-significant results: systematic review and recommendations</i> 2017

Works That Cite This (260)

Action Title Year Authors
+ Adjusting for Publication Bias in JASP and R: Selection Models, PET-PEESE, and Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis 2022 František Bartoš
Maximilian Maier
Daniel Quintana
Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers
+ PDF Chat Calibration of individual-based models to epidemiological data: A systematic review 2020 C. Marijn Hazelbag
Jonathan Dushoff
Emanuel M. Dominic
Zinhle E. Mthombothi
Wim Delva
+ PDF Chat Optimal sampling in derivation studies was associated with improved discrimination in external validation for heart failure prognostic models 2020 Naotsugu Iwakami
Toshiyuki Nagai
Toshi A. Furukawa
Aran Tajika
Akira Ōnishi
Kunihiro Nishimura
Soshiro Ogata
Michikazu Nakai
Misa Takegami
Hiroki Nakano
+ PDF Chat Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in Medical Journals 2020 Fang‐Shu Ou
Jennifer Le‐Rademacher
Karla V. Ballman
Alex A. Adjei
Sumithra J. Mandrekar
+ PDF Chat Calibration of individual-based models to epidemiological data: a systematic review 2019 C. Marijn Hazelbag
Jonathan Dushoff
Emanuel M. Dominic
Zinhle E. Mthombothi
Wim Delva
+ PDF Chat Aplicação da modelagem epidemiológica Suscetível - Infectado - Recuperado frente à ocorrência da COVID-19: uma revisão sistemática de literatura 2020 Alisson dos Anjos Santos
Jamile de Almeida Santos
Júlia Spínola Ávila
Maria Carolina Nascimento Carmo
Natáli de Carvalho Lima
Helianildes Silva Ferreira
+ Bayesian Model Averaging: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Classification 2017 Tiago M. Fragoso
Wesley Bertoli
Francisco Louzada
+ Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2 2011 David C. Hoaglin
Neil Hawkins
Jeroen P. Jansen
David A. Scott
Robbin Itzler
Joseph C. Cappelleri
Cornelis Boersma
David R. Thompson
Kay Larholt
Mireya Díaz
+ PDF Chat Efficacy and Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2022 Ramy Mohamed Ghazy
Rasha Ashmawy
Noha Alaa Hamdy
Yasir Ahmed Mohammed Elhadi
Omar Ahmed Reyad
Dina Hussein Elmalawany
Abdallah Almaghraby
Ramy Shaaban
Sarah Hamed N. Taha
+ PDF Chat Behavioural change models for infectious disease transmission: a systematic review (2010–2015) 2016 Frederik Verelst
Lander Willem
Philippe Beutels