Does a Placebo Run-In or a Placebo Treatment Cell Affect the Efficacy of Antidepressant Medications?

Type: Review

Publication Date: 1994-08-01

Citations: 177

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.1994.63

Abstract

During the last decade, there has been an increasing use of a placebo run-in period prior to randomization to active treatments, or placebo in randomized controlled trials aimed at establishing acute phase antidepressant drug efficacy in patients with major depression. This procedure is thought to reduce response rates to placebo treatment after randomization, thereby increasing the drug-placebo difference. Metaanalyses of 101 studies reveal that a placebo run-in does not (1) lower the placebo response rate, (2) increase the drug-placebo difference, or (3) affect the drug response rate post-randomization in either inpatients or outpatients for any antidepressant drug group. If there is a post-randomization placebo treatment cell, drug response rates are unchanged or are slightly lower than if there is no placebo treatment cell for outpatients. These results suggest that a pill placebo run-in provides no advantage in acute phase efficacy trials.

Locations

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ Is There a Placebo Problem in Antidepressant Trials? 2005 Huaiyu Yang
Cristina Cusin
Maurizio Fava
+ Randomization and placebo effects in clinical trials of major depressive disorder 2025 James A. Rogers
Stephen Senn
+ Placebo run-in periods in anticholinergic trials are not associated with treatment effect size or risk of attrition: an empirical evaluation 2020 Amalia Karahalios
Peter Herbison
Joanne E. McKenzie
+ Does the Presence of an Open-Label Antidepressant Treatment Period Influence Study Outcome in Clinical Trials Examining Augmentation/Combination Strategies in Treatment Partial Responders/Nonresponders With Major Depressive Disorder? 2012 Nadia Iovieno
George I. Papakostas
+ Run-in Periods in Randomized Trials 1998 Ariel Pablos-Méndez
R. Graham Barr
Steven Shea
+ PDF Chat Does differential drop-out explain the influence of study design on antidepressant response? A meta-analysis 2012 Bret R. Rutherford
Joel R. Sneed
Steven P. Roose
+ PDF Chat Are washout periods useful in antidepressant trials? 2000 C. Even
S. Friedman
Roland Dardennes
+ PDF Chat Placebo Washout in Trials of Antipsychotic Drugs 1996 Jan Volavka
Thomas B. Cooper
Eugene Laska
Morris Meisner
+ Remarks on designs enriching for placebo non-responders 2016 G. Rosenkranz
+ Adaptive Randomization Study Design in Clinical Trials for Psychiatric Disorders 2013 Navin Goyal
+ Usefulness of the placebo lead-in design for clinical trials with binary outcomes 2023 Gosuke Homma
Takashi Daimon
+ The Enrichment Window Approach as a Means of Dealing with Placebo Response in Antidepressant Clinical Trials 2010 Craig Mallinckrodt
William R. Prucka
+ PDF Chat Success and efficiency of phase 2/3 adjunctive trials for MDD funded by industry: a systematic review 2020 Naji C. Salloum
Maurizio Fava
Sophia Ball
George I. Papakostas
+ Do Not Rule Out Double-blind Placebo Run-in Periods for Randomized Clinical Trials—Reply 2022 Amelia J. Scott
Louise Sharpe
Ben Colagiuri
+ The randomized placebo-phase design for clinical trials 2001 Brian M. Feldman
Elaine Wang
Andrew R. Willan
John Paul Szalai
+ The randomized placebo-phase design for clinical trials 2003 Brian M. Feldman
Elaine Wang
Andrew R. Willan
John Paul Szalai
+ Run-in Periods in Randomized Clinical Trials 2017 Kenneth B. Schechtman
+ PDF Chat Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials in the Treatment of Affective Disorders: Problems and Alternatives 2015 Emanuel Severus
Eric B. Laber
Ilya Lipkovich
+ Does placebo help establish equivalence in trials of new antidepressants? 2000 Corrado Barbui
A Violante
Silvio Garattini
+ PISC Expert Team White Paper: Toward a Consistent Standard of Evidence When Evaluating the Efficacy of an Experimental Treatment From a Randomized, Active-Controlled Trial 2010 Patrick Peterson
Kevin Carroll
Christy Chuang‐Stein
Yu‐Yun Ho
Qi Jiang
Gang Li
M. Matilde Sanchez
Rick Sax
Yongcheng Wang
Steven Snapinn

Works That Cite This (41)

Action Title Year Authors
+ From Trial and Error to Trial Simulation. Part 2: An Appraisal of Current Beliefs in the Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials for Antidepressant Drugs 2009 Gijs W.E. Santen
Joseph P. Horrigan
Meindert Danhof
Oscar Della Pasqua
+ Remarks on designs enriching for placebo non-responders 2016 G. Rosenkranz
+ Sequential parallel comparison design with binary and time‐to‐event outcomes 2018 Rachel Kloss Silverman
Anastasia Ivanova
Jason P. Fine
+ A case study in identifying targeted patients population in major depressive disorder by enhanced enrichment design 2017 Peter Zhang
Kevin Carroll
Mary Hobart
Carole Augustine
Gary G. Koch
+ PDF Chat Permutation and Bootstrap Testing for the Sequential Parallel Comparison Design 2019 Rachel Kloss Silverman
Jason P. Fine
Richard C. Zink
Anastasia Ivanova
+ PDF Chat Maintenance of Blinding in Clinical Trials and the Implications for Studying Analgesia Using Cannabinoids 2016 Barth Wilsey
Reena Deutsch
Thomas D. Marcotte
+ PDF Chat Design Archetypes for Phase 2 Clinical Trials in Central Nervous System Disorders 2010 Craig Mallinckrodt
Michael J. Detke
William R. Prucka
Stephen J. Ruberg
Geert Molenberghs
+ PDF Chat A repeated measures model for analysis of continuous outcomes in sequential parallel comparison design studies 2013 Gheorghe Doros
Michael Pencina
Denis Rybin
Allison Meisner
Maurizio Fava
+ Recent developments in improving signal detection and reducing placebo response in psychiatric clinical trials 2011 Craig Mallinckrodt
Roy Tamura
Yoko Tanaka
+ Placebo run-in periods in anticholinergic trials are not associated with treatment effect size or risk of attrition: an empirical evaluation 2020 Amalia Karahalios
Peter Herbison
Joanne E. McKenzie

Works Cited by This (0)

Action Title Year Authors