On the diversity of superluminous supernovae: ejected mass as the dominant factor

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2015-08-07

Citations: 166

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1522

Abstract

We assemble a sample of 24 hydrogen-poor super-luminous supernovae (SLSNe). Parameterizing the light curve shape through rise and decline timescales shows that the two are highly correlated. Magnetar-powered models can reproduce the correlation, with the diversity in rise and decline rates driven by the diffusion timescale. Circumstellar interaction models can exhibit a similar rise-decline relation, but only for a narrow range of densities, which may be problematic for these models. We find that SLSNe are approximately 3.5 magnitudes brighter and have light curves 3 times broader than SNe Ibc, but that the intrinsic shapes are similar. There are a number of SLSNe with particularly broad light curves, possibly indicating two progenitor channels, but statistical tests do not cleanly separate two populations. The general spectral evolution is also presented. Velocities measured from Fe II are similar for SLSNe and SNe Ibc, suggesting that diffusion time differences are dominated by mass or opacity. Flat velocity evolution in most SLSNe suggests a dense shell of ejecta. If opacities in SLSNe are similar to other SNe Ibc, the average ejected mass is higher by a factor 2-3. Assuming $κ=0.1\,$cm$^2\,$g$^{-1}$, we estimate a mean (median) SLSN ejecta mass of 10$\,$M$_\odot$ (6$\,$M$_\odot$), with a range of 3-30$\,$M$_\odot$. Doubling the assumed opacity brings the masses closer to normal SNe Ibc, but with a high-mass tail. The most probable mechanism for generating SLSNe seems to be the core-collapse of a very massive hydrogen-poor star, forming a millisecond magnetar.

Locations

  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society - View - PDF
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) - View - PDF
  • Liverpool John Moores University - View - PDF
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) - View - PDF
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) - View - PDF
  • DataCite API - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat The Pre-explosion Mass Distribution of Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernova Progenitors and New Evidence for a Mass–Spin Correlation 2020 P. K. Blanchard
E. Berger
M. Nicholl
V. Ashley Villar
+ PDF Chat SUPER-LUMINOUS TYPE Ic SUPERNOVAE: CATCHING A MAGNETAR BY THE TAIL 2013 C. Inserra
S. J. Smartt
A. Jerkstrand
S. Valenti
M. Fraser
D. J. Wright
K. Smith
T. W. Chen
R. Kotak
A. Pastorello
+ PDF Chat Close, bright, and boxy: the superluminous SN 2018hti 2022 A. Fiore
S. Benetti
M. Nicholl
A. Reguitti
E. Cappellaro
S. Campana
S. Bose
E. Paraskeva
E. Berger
T. E. Müller-Bravo
+ PDF Chat Fast evolving pair-instability supernova models: evolution, explosion, light curves 2016 Alexandra Kozyreva
Matthew Gilmer
Raphaël Hirschi
Carla Fröhlich
С. И. Блинников
Ryan Wollaeger
U. M. Noebauer
Daniel R. van Rossum
Alexander Heger
Wesley Even
+ PDF Chat The Type I Superluminous Supernova Catalog I: Light Curve Properties, Models, and Catalog Description 2024 Sebastián Gómez
M. Nicholl
E. Berger
P. K. Blanchard
V. Ashley Villar
S. Rest
G. Hosseinzadeh
A. Aamer
Yukta Ajay
Wasundara Athukoralalage
+ PDF Chat On the nature of hydrogen-rich superluminous supernovae 2017 C. Inserra
S. J. Smartt
Erwin Gáll
G. Leloudas
T. W. Chen
S. Schulze
A. Jerkstrand
M. Nicholl
J. P. Anderson
I. Arcavi
+ PDF Chat A Statistical Approach to Identify Superluminous Supernovae and Probe Their Diversity 2018 C. Inserra
S. Prajs
C. P. Gutiérrez
C. Angus
M. Smith
M. Sullivan
+ The Magnetar Model for Type I Superluminous Supernovae. I. Bayesian Analysis of the Full Multicolor Light-curve Sample with MOSFiT 2017 M. Nicholl
James Guillochon
E. Berger
+ PDF Chat Late-time Hubble Space Telescope Observations of a Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernova Reveal the Power-law Decline of a Magnetar Central Engine 2021 P. K. Blanchard
E. Berger
M. Nicholl
R. Chornock
Sebastián Gómez
G. Hosseinzadeh
+ PDF Chat Superluminous supernovae from PESSTO 2014 M. Nicholl
S. J. Smartt
A. Jerkstrand
C. Inserra
J. P. Anderson
C. Baltay
S. Benetti
T. W. Chen
N. Elias–Rosa
U. Feindt
+ PDF Chat The bolometric light curve modeling of 98 Type I superluminous supernovae using the magnetar- and the circumstellar interaction models reveals surprisingly high ejecta masses 2025 Réka Könyves-Tóth
+ PDF Chat PS1-14bj: A HYDROGEN-POOR SUPERLUMINOUS SUPERNOVA WITH A LONG RISE AND SLOW DECAY 2016 R. Lunnan
R. Chornock
E. Berger
D. Milisavljević
D. O. Jones
A. Rest
W. Fong
Claes Fransson
R. Margutti
M. R. Drout
+ DES14X3taz: A TYPE I SUPERLUMINOUS SUPERNOVA SHOWING A LUMINOUS, RAPIDLY COOLING INITIAL PRE-PEAK BUMP 2016 M. Smith
M. Sullivan
C. B. D’Andrea
F. J. Castander
R. Casas
S. Prajs
A. Papadopoulos
R. C. Nichol
N. V. Karpenka
S. Bernard
+ PDF Chat Photometric and spectroscopic diversity of Type II supernovae 2019 D. J. Hillier
Luc Dessart
+ PDF Chat A Systematic Study of Superluminous Supernova Light-curve Models Using Clustering 2019 E. Chatzopoulos
Richard Tuminello
+ Weak Mass Loss from the Red Supergiant Progenitor of the Type II SN 2021yja 2022 G. Hosseinzadeh
C. D. Kilpatrick
Yize Dong
David J. Sand
Jennifer E. Andrews
K. Azalee Bostroem
Daryl Janzen
J. Jencson
M. Lundquist
N. Meza
+ Weak Mass Loss from the Red Supergiant Progenitor of the Type II SN 2021yja 2022 G. Hosseinzadeh
C. D. Kilpatrick
Yize Dong
David J. Sand
Jennifer E. Andrews
K. Azalee Bostroem
Daryl Janzen
J. Jencson
M. Lundquist
N. Meza
+ PDF Chat PS1-10bzj: A FAST, HYDROGEN-POOR SUPERLUMINOUS SUPERNOVA IN A METAL-POOR HOST GALAXY 2013 R. Lunnan
R. Chornock
E. Berger
D. Milisavljević
M. R. Drout
Nathan Sanders
P. Challis
Ian Czekala
R. J. Foley
W. Fong
+ Luminous Supernovae: Unveiling a Population Between Superluminous and Normal Core-collapse Supernovae 2022 Sebastián Gómez
E. Berger
M. Nicholl
P. K. Blanchard
G. Hosseinzadeh
+ PDF Chat Luminous Supernovae: Unveiling a Population between Superluminous and Normal Core-collapse Supernovae 2022 Sebastián Gómez
E. Berger
M. Nicholl
P. K. Blanchard
G. Hosseinzadeh

Works That Cite This (152)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat <i>Euclid:</i> Superluminous supernovae in the Deep Survey 2017 C. Inserra
R. C. Nichol
D. Scovacricchi
J. Amiaux
M. Brescia
C. Burigana
E. Cappellaro
C. S. Carvalho
S. Cavuoti
Vito Conforti
+ The first Hubble diagram and cosmological constraints using superluminous supernovae 2021 C. Inserra
M. Sullivan
C. Angus
E. Macaulay
R. C. Nichol
M. Smith
C. Frohmaier
C. P. Gutiérrez
M Vicenzi
A. Möller
+ PDF Chat On the event rate and luminosity function of superluminous supernovae 2020 Wenchang Zhao
Xiao-Xin Xue
Xiao-Feng Cao
+ SN 2020zbf: A fast-rising hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova with strong carbon lines 2024 A. Gkini
R. Lunnan
S. Schulze
Luc Dessart
S. Brennan
J. Sollerman
P. J. Pessi
M. Nicholl
Lin Yan
Conor M. B. Omand
+ PDF Chat The diversity of transients from magnetar birth in core collapse supernovae 2015 Brian D. Metzger
Ben Margalit
Daniel Kasen
Eliot Quataert
+ PDF Chat Observational properties of extreme supernovae 2019 C. Inserra
+ PDF Chat Modeling The Most Luminous Supernova Associated with a Gamma-Ray Burst, SN 2011kl 2017 Shan-Qin Wang
Z. Cano
Ling‐Jun Wang
WeiKang Zheng
Zi-Gao Dai
A. V. Filippenko
Liang-Duan Liu
+ PDF Chat Modeling the Light Curves of the Luminous Type Ic Supernova 2007D 2019 Shan-Qin Wang
Z. Cano
Long Li
Liang-Duan Liu
Ling‐Jun Wang
WeiKang Zheng
Zi-Gao Dai
En‐Wei Liang
A. V. Filippenko
+ PDF Chat Superluminous supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey 2019 C. Angus
M. Smith
M. Sullivan
C. Inserra
P. Wiseman
C. B. D’Andrea
Benjamin P. Thomas
R. C. Nichol
L. Galbany
M. Childress
+ PDF Chat A Monte Carlo Approach to Magnetar-powered Transients. I. Hydrogen-deficient Superluminous Supernovae 2017 Liang-Duan Liu
Shan-Qin Wang
Ling‐Jun Wang
Zi-Gao Dai
Hai Yu
Zong-Kai Peng

Works Cited by This (91)

Action Title Year Authors
+ Using Double-peaked Supernova Light Curves to Study Extended Material 2015 Anthony L. Piro
+ PDF Chat Optical Photometry of the Type Ia SN 1999ee and the Type Ib/c SN 1999ex in IC 5179 2002 M. Stritzinger
M. Hamuy
N. B. Suntzeff
R. C. Smith
M. M. Phillips
J. Maza
Louis-Gregory Strolger
R. Antezana
L. González
M. Wischnjewsky
+ PDF Chat Optical Photometry of the Type I[CLC]a[/CLC] Supernova 1999[CLC]ee[/CLC] and the Type I[CLC]b[/CLC]/[CLC]c[/CLC] Supernova 1999[CLC]ex[/CLC] in IC 5179 2002 M. Stritzinger
M. Hamuy
N. B. Suntzeff
R. C. Smith
M. M. Phillips
J. Maza
Louis-Gregory Strolger
R. Antezana
L. González
M. Wischnjewsky
+ PDF Chat ZOOMING IN ON THE PROGENITORS OF SUPERLUMINOUS SUPERNOVAE WITH THE<i>HST</i> 2015 R. Lunnan
R. Chornock
E. Berger
A. Rest
W. Fong
D. Scolnic
D. O. Jones
A. M. Soderberg
P. Challis
M. R. Drout
+ PDF Chat The broad-lined Type Ic supernova 2003jd★ 2007 S. Valenti
S. Benetti
E. Cappellaro
F. Patat
P. A. Mazzali
M. Turatto
K. Hurley
Keiichi Maeda
A. Gal‐Yam
R. J. Foley
+ PDF Chat Superluminous supernovae: 56Ni power versus magnetar radiation 2012 Luc Dessart
D. J. Hillier
Roni Waldman
Eli Livne
S. Blondin
+ PDF Chat TWO SUPERLUMINOUS SUPERNOVAE FROM THE EARLY UNIVERSE DISCOVERED BY THE SUPERNOVA LEGACY SURVEY 2013 D. A. Howell
Daniel Kasen
C. Lidman
M. Sullivan
A. Conley
P. Astier
C. Balland
R. G. Carlberg
D. Fouchez
J. Guy
+ PDF Chat Optical and X-ray emission from stable millisecond magnetars formed from the merger of binary neutron stars 2014 Brian D. Metzger
Anthony L. Piro
+ PDF Chat The SkyMapper Telescope and The Southern Sky Survey 2007 S. Keller
B. Schmidt
M. S. Bessell
P. Conroy
Paul Francis
Alexander Granlund
E. Kowald
A. P. Oates
Tony Martin-Jones
T. Preston
+ PDF Chat Magnetized relativistic jets and long-duration GRBs from magnetar spin-down during core-collapse supernovae 2009 N. Bucciantini
Eliot Quataert
Brian D. Metzger
Todd A. Thompson
Jonathan Arons
L. Del Zanna