Type: Article
Publication Date: 1978-01-01
Citations: 118
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24033/asens.1340
of results1.1.The most frequently used and best motivated curvature assumptions in qualitative Riemannian geometry are bounds on the sectional curvatures of the Riemann tensor R. Associated with R is the so-called curvature operator R : A 2 Tp M -> A 2 Tp M (Tp M = V henceforth).The symmetries of R (not including the Bianchi identity) imply that R is a symmetric operator.Special assumptions on R also have geometric consequences, for example:(i) a compact, connected and oriented Riemannian manifold with positive curvature operator R has the rational homology of the sphere (this is a nice theorem of D. Meyer proved in [4]);(ii) the positivity of R implies that the Gauss-Bonnet integrand is positive (cf.[12]).In both cases positive sectional curvature is known not to be sufficient {cf.[5] and [10] for(ii)).1.2.The linear map R has more geometric invariants than just its spectrum, since the geometrically relevant orthogonal group which acts on all occurring tensor spaces is 0 (V)./\ For example the Bianchi identity for R does not make sense for the action of 0 (A V).Further 0 (V)-invariants are connected with the rank of the eigenvectors.Notice then the following geometric examples: ^.(i) the eigenvector associated with the largest eigenvalue of R for the standard complex projective space is the Kahler form;( 1 )