Author Description

Anand Pillay is a British-American mathematician and logician known for his work in model theory, particularly in the areas of stability theory and classification theory. He has held academic positions at various universities, including the University of Notre Dame, and is recognized for his significant contributions to mathematical logic. Pillay has authored numerous research articles and books in model theory, and he is a Fellow of the American Mathematical Society.

Ask a Question About This Mathematician

Abstract This book gives an account of the fundamental results in geometric stability theory, a subject that has grown out of categoricity and classification theory. This approach studies the fine … Abstract This book gives an account of the fundamental results in geometric stability theory, a subject that has grown out of categoricity and classification theory. This approach studies the fine structure of models of stable theories, using the geometry of forking; this often achieves global results relevant to classification theory. Topics range from Zilber-Cherlin classification of infinite locally finite homogenous geometries, to regular types, their geometries, and their role in superstable theories. The structure and existence of definable groups is featured prominently, as is work by Hrushovski. The book is unique in the range and depth of material covered and will be invaluable to anyone interested in modern model theory.
We discuss measures, invariant measures on definable groups, and genericity, often in an NIP (failure of the independence property) environment. We complete the proof of the third author's conjectures relating … We discuss measures, invariant measures on definable groups, and genericity, often in an NIP (failure of the independence property) environment. We complete the proof of the third author's conjectures relating definably compact groups $G$ in saturated $o$-minimal structures to compact Lie groups. We also prove some other structural results about such $G$, for example the existence of a left invariant finitely additive probability measure on definable subsets of $G$. We finally introduce the new notion of "compact domination" (domination of a definable set by a compact space) and raise some new conjectures in the $o$-minimal case.
We study forking, Lascar strong types, Keisler measures and definable groups, under an assumption of NIP (not the independence property), continuing aspects of the paper [16]. Among key results are … We study forking, Lascar strong types, Keisler measures and definable groups, under an assumption of NIP (not the independence property), continuing aspects of the paper [16]. Among key results are (i) if p = \mathrm{tp}(b/A) does not fork over A then the Lascar strong type of b over A coincides with the compact strong type of b over A and any global nonforking extension of p is Borel definable over \mathrm{bdd}(A) , (ii) analogous statements for Keisler measures and definable groups, including the fact that G^{000} = G^{00} for G definably amenable, (iii) definitions, characterizations and properties of “generically stable” types and groups, (iv) uniqueness of invariant (under the group action) Keisler measures on groups with finitely satisfiable generics, (v) a proof of the compact domination conjecture for (definably compact) commutative groups in o -minimal expansions of real closed fields.
On introduit la notion de theorie O-minimale des structures ordonnees, une telle theorie etant telle que les sous-ensembles definissables de ses modeles soient particulierement simples On introduit la notion de theorie O-minimale des structures ordonnees, une telle theorie etant telle que les sous-ensembles definissables de ses modeles soient particulierement simples
It is proved that any <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-minimal structure <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">M</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> … It is proved that any <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-minimal structure <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">M</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> (in which the underlying order is dense) is strongly <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-minimal (namely, every <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper N"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">N</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> elementarily equivalent to <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">M</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-minimal). It is simultaneously proved that if <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">M</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-minimal, then every definable set of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="n"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">n</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-tuples of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">M</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> has finitely many "definably connected components."
In this paper we discuss several generalization of theorems from stability theory to simple theories. Cherlin and Hrushovski, in [2] develop a substitute for canonical bases in finite rank, ω-categorical … In this paper we discuss several generalization of theorems from stability theory to simple theories. Cherlin and Hrushovski, in [2] develop a substitute for canonical bases in finite rank, ω-categorical supersimple theories. Motivated by methods there, we prove the existence of canonical bases (in a suitable sense) for types in any simple theory. This is done in Section 2. In general these canonical bases will (as far as we know) exist only as “hyperimaginaries”, namely objects of the form a / E where a is a possibly infinite tuple and E a type-definable equivalence relation. (In the supersimple, ω-categorical case, these reduce to ordinary imaginaries.) So in Section 1 we develop the general theory of hyperimaginaries and show how first order model theory (including the theory of forking) generalises to hyperimaginaries. We go on, in Section 3 to show the existence and ubiquity of regular types in supersimple theories, ω-categorical simple structures and modularity is discussed in Section 4. It is also shown here how the general machinery of simplicity simplifies some of the general theory of smoothly approximable (or Lie-coordinatizable) structures from [2]. Throughout this paper we will work in a large, saturated model M of a complete theory T . All types, sets and sequences will have size smaller than the size of M . We will assume that the reader is familiar with the basics of forking in simple theories as laid out in [4] and [6]. For basic stability-theoretic results concerning regular types, orthogonality etc., see [1] or [9].
We study type-definable subgroups of small index in definable groups, and the structure on the quotient, in first order structures. We raise some conjectures in the case where the ambient … We study type-definable subgroups of small index in definable groups, and the structure on the quotient, in first order structures. We raise some conjectures in the case where the ambient structure is o-minimal. The gist is that in this o-minimal case, any definable group G should have a smallest type-definable subgroup of bounded index, and that the quotient, when equipped with the logic topology, should be a compact Lie group of the "right" dimension. I give positive answers to the conjectures in the special cases when G is 1-dimensional, and when G is definably simple.
We formulate the measure analogue of generically stable types in first order theories with $NIP$ (without the independence property), giving several characterizations, answering some questions from an earlier paper by … We formulate the measure analogue of generically stable types in first order theories with $NIP$ (without the independence property), giving several characterizations, answering some questions from an earlier paper by Hrushovski and Pillay, and giving another treatment of uniqueness results from the same paper. We introduce a notion of "generic compact domination", relating it to stationarity of the Keisler measures, and also giving definable group versions. We also prove the "approximate definability" of arbitrary Borel probability measures on definable sets in the real and $p$-adic fields.
The second of a two volume set showcasing current research in model theory and its connections with number theory, algebraic geometry, real analytic geometry and differential algebra. Each volume contains … The second of a two volume set showcasing current research in model theory and its connections with number theory, algebraic geometry, real analytic geometry and differential algebra. Each volume contains a series of expository essays and research papers around the subject matter of a Newton Institute Semester on Model Theory and Applications to Algebra and Analysis. The articles convey outstanding new research on topics such as model theory and conjectures around Mordell-Lang; arithmetic of differential equations, and Galois theory of difference equations; model theory and complex analytic geometry; o-minimality; model theory and non-commutative geometry; definable groups of finite dimension; Hilbert's tenth problem; and Hrushovski constructions. With contributions from so many leaders in the field, this book will undoubtedly appeal to all mathematicians with an interest in model theory and its applications, from graduate students to senior researchers and from beginners to experts.
Let 〈R, >,+,⋅〉 be a real closed field, and let M be an o-minimal expansion of R. We prove here several results regarding rings and groups which are definable in … Let 〈R, >,+,⋅〉 be a real closed field, and let M be an o-minimal expansion of R. We prove here several results regarding rings and groups which are definable in M. We show that every M–definable ring without zero divisors is definably isomorphic to R, R(√(−l)) or the ring of quaternions over R. One corollary is that no model of Texp is interpretable in a model of Tan.
In this paper we introduce the notion of a first order topological structure, and consider various possible conditions on the complexity of the definable sets in such a structure, drawing … In this paper we introduce the notion of a first order topological structure, and consider various possible conditions on the complexity of the definable sets in such a structure, drawing several consequences thereof. Our aim is to develop, for a restricted class of unstable theories, results analogous to those for stable theories. The “material basis” for such an endeavor is the analogy between the field of real numbers and the field of complex numbers, the former being a “nicely behaved” unstable structure and the latter the archetypal stable structure. In this sense we try here to situate our work on o -minimal structures [PS] in a general topological context. Note, however, that the p -adic numbers, and structures definable therein, will also fit into our analysis. In the remainder of this section we discuss several ways of studying topological structures model-theoretically. Eventually we fix on the notion of a structure in which the topology is “explicitly definable” in the sense of Flum and Ziegler [FZ]. In §2 we introduce the hypothesis that every definable set is a Boolean combination of definable open sets. In §3 we introduce a “dimension rank” on (closed) definable sets. In §4 we consider structures on which this rank is defined, and for which also every definable set has a finite number of definably connected definable components. We show that prime models over sets exist under such conditions.
In this paper we solve some problems posed by Kolchin about differential algebraic groups.The main result (from which the others follow) is the embeddability of any differential algebraic group in … In this paper we solve some problems posed by Kolchin about differential algebraic groups.The main result (from which the others follow) is the embeddability of any differential algebraic group in an algebraic group.A crucial intermediate result, and one of independent interest, is a generalisation of Weil's theorem on recovering an algebraic group from birational data, to pro-algebraic groups.
This paper introduces and begins the study of a well-behaved class of linearly ordered structures, the ^-minimal structures.The definition of this class and the corresponding class of theories, the strongly … This paper introduces and begins the study of a well-behaved class of linearly ordered structures, the ^-minimal structures.The definition of this class and the corresponding class of theories, the strongly ©-minimal theories, is made in analogy with the notions from stability theory of minimal structures and strongly minimal theories.Theorems 2.1 and 2.3, respectively, provide characterizations of C-minimal ordered groups and rings.Several other simple results are collected in §3.The primary tool in the analysis of ¿¡-minimal structures is a strong analogue of "forking symmetry," given by Theorem 4.2.This result states that any (parametrically) definable unary function in an (5-minimal structure is piecewise either constant or an order-preserving or reversing bijection of intervals.The results that follow include the existence and uniqueness of prime models over sets (Theorem 5.1) and a characterization of all N0-categorical ¿¡¡-minimal structures (Theorem 6.1).
We continue the investigation of infinite, definably simple groups which are definable in o-minimal structures. In<italic>Definably simple groups in o-minimal structures</italic>, we showed that every such group is a semialgebraic … We continue the investigation of infinite, definably simple groups which are definable in o-minimal structures. In<italic>Definably simple groups in o-minimal structures</italic>, we showed that every such group is a semialgebraic group over a real closed field. Our main result here, stated in a model theoretic language, is that every such group is either bi-interpretable with an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero (when the group is stable) or with a real closed field (when the group is unstable). It follows that every abstract isomorphism between two unstable groups as above is a composition of a semialgebraic map with a field isomorphism. We discuss connections to theorems of Freudenthal, Borel-Tits and Weisfeiler on automorphisms of real Lie groups and simple algebraic groups over real closed fields.
Abstract We continue the study of simple theories begun in [3] and [5]. We first find the right analogue of definability of types. We then develop the theory of generic … Abstract We continue the study of simple theories begun in [3] and [5]. We first find the right analogue of definability of types. We then develop the theory of generic types and stabilizers for groups definable in simple theories. The general ideology is that the role of formulas (or definability) in stable theories is replaced by partial types (or ∞-definability) in simple theories.
It is proved that any O-minimal structure M (in which the underlying order is dense) is strongly O-minimal (namely, every N elementarily equivalent to M is O-minimal).It is simultaneously proved … It is proved that any O-minimal structure M (in which the underlying order is dense) is strongly O-minimal (namely, every N elementarily equivalent to M is O-minimal).It is simultaneously proved that if M is 0minimal, then every definable set of n-tuples of M has finitely many "definably connected components."0. Introduction.In this paper we study the structure of definable sets (of tuples) in an arbitrary O-minimal structure M (in which the underlying order is dense).Recall from [PSI, PS2] that the structure M is said to be O-minimal if M = (M, <, Ri)iei, where < is a total ordering on M and every definable (with parameters) subset of M is a finite union of points in M and intervals (a, b) where aE M or a = -co and b E M or b = +co.M is said to be strongly O-minimal if every N which is elementarily equivalent to M is O-minimal.We will always assume that the underlying order of M is a dense order with no first or least element.In this paper we also introduce the notion of a definable set X C Mn being definably connected, and we prove THEOREM 0.1.Let M be O-minimal.Then any definable X C Mn is a disjoint union of finitely many definably connected definable sets.THEOREM 0.2.If M is O-minimal, then M is strongly O-minimal.THEOREM 0.3.(a) Let M be O-minimal and let (p(xi,...,xn,yi,...,ym) be any formula of L (the language for M).Then there is K < uj such that for any b E Mm, the set <j>(x,b)M (= {5 E Mn:M t= 4>(a,b)}) has at most K definably connected components.(b) If M is a O-minimal expansion o/(R, <), then in (a) we can replace definably connected by connected.Theorems 0.1 and 0.2 are proved simultaneously by a rather complicated induction argument (outlined in §3 and undertaken in § §4 and 5).Theorem 0.3 follows from Theorems 0.1 and 0.2 by a compactness argument.Let us remark that if M is the field of real numbers, or more generally any real closed field, then by Tarski's quantifier elimination [T], M is (strongly) O-minimal and moreover the definable sets (of n-tuples) in M are precisely the semialgebraic
In [MP] Marker and Pillay showed that if X ⊂ C n is constructible but ( C , +, X ) is not locally modular, then multiplication is definable in … In [MP] Marker and Pillay showed that if X ⊂ C n is constructible but ( C , +, X ) is not locally modular, then multiplication is definable in the structure ( C , +, X ). That result extended earlier results of Martin [M] and Rabinovich and Zil'ber [RZ]. Here we will examine additive reducts of R and Q p . Definition. A subset X of R n is called semialgebraic if it is definable in the structure ( R , +,·). A subset X of R n is called semilinear if it is definable in the structure ( R , +, &lt;,λ r ) r∈ b , where λ r is the function x ↦ rx [scalar multiplication by r ]. Every semilinear set is a Boolean combination of sets of the form { : p ( ) = 0} and { : q ( ) &gt; 0}, where p ( ) and q ( ) are linear polynomials. Van den Dries asked the following question: if X is semialgebraic but not semilinear, can we define multiplication in ( R , +, &lt;, X )? This was answered negatively by Pillay, Scowcroft and Steinhorn. Theorem 1.1 [PSS]. Suppose X ⊂ R n is semialgebraic and X ⊂ I n for some bounded interval I. Then multiplication is not definable in ( R , +, &lt;, X ,λ r ) r ∈ R . In particular if X = · ∣ [0, l ] 2 , the graph of multiplication restricted to the unit interval, then X is not semilinear so we have a negative answer to van den Dries' question. Peterzil showed that this is the only restriction.
We show that any <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="o"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>o</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">o</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-minimal structure has a strongly <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="o"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>o</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">o</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> … We show that any <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="o"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>o</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">o</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-minimal structure has a strongly <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="o"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>o</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">o</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-minimal theory.
A subset $X$ of a group $G$ is called <em>left generic</em> if finitely many left translates of $X$ cover $G$. Our main result is that if $G$ is a definably … A subset $X$ of a group $G$ is called <em>left generic</em> if finitely many left translates of $X$ cover $G$. Our main result is that if $G$ is a definably compact group in an o-minimal structure and a definable $X\subseteq G$ is not right generic then i
Abstract The notion of CM-triviality was introduced by Hrushovski, who showed that his new strongly minimal sets have this property. Recently Baudisch has shown that his new ω 1 -categorical … Abstract The notion of CM-triviality was introduced by Hrushovski, who showed that his new strongly minimal sets have this property. Recently Baudisch has shown that his new ω 1 -categorical group has this property. Here we show that any group of finite Morley rank definable in a CM-trivial theory is nilpotent-by-finite, or equivalently no simple group of finite Morley rank can be definable in a CM-trivial theory.
An impressive theory has been developed, largely by Shelah, around the notion of a stable theory. This includes detailed structure theorems for the models of such theories as well as … An impressive theory has been developed, largely by Shelah, around the notion of a stable theory. This includes detailed structure theorems for the models of such theories as well as a generalized notion of independence. The various stability properties can be defined in terms of the numbers of types over sets, or in terms of the complexity of definable sets. In the concrete examples of stable theories, however, one finds an important distinction between “positive” and “negative” information, such a distinction not being an a priori consequence of the general definitions. In the naive examples this may take the form of distinguishing between say a class of a definable equivalence relation and the complement of a class. In the more algebraic examples, this distinction may have a “topological” significance, for example with the Zariski topology on (the set of n -tuples of) an algebraically closed field, the “closed” sets being those given by sets of polynomial equalities. Note that in the latter case, every definable set is a Boolean combination of such closed sets (the definable sets are precisely the constructible sets). Similarly, stability conditions in practice reduce to chain conditions on certain “special” definable sets (e.g. in modules, stable groups). The aim here is to develop and present such notions in the general (model-theoretic) context. The basic notion is that of an “equation”. Given a complete theory T in a language L , an L -formula φ ( x̄, ȳ ) is said to be an equation (in x̄ ) if any collection Φ of instances of φ (i.e. of formulae φ ( x̄, ā )) is equivalent to a finite subset Φ′ ⊂ Φ .
We study the notions generic stability, regularity, homogeneous pregeometries, quasiminimality, and their mutual relations, in arbitrary first order theories. We prove that “infinite-dimensional homogeneous pregeometries” coincide with generically stable strongly … We study the notions generic stability, regularity, homogeneous pregeometries, quasiminimality, and their mutual relations, in arbitrary first order theories. We prove that “infinite-dimensional homogeneous pregeometries” coincide with generically stable strongly regular types (p(x), x = x). We prove that in a theory without the strict order property, regular types are generically stable, and prove analogous results for quasiminimal structures. We prove that the “generic type” of a quasiminimal structure is “locally strongly regular”.
Abstract The four authors present their speculations about the future developments of mathematical logic in the twenty-first century. The areas of recursion theory, proof theory and logic for computer science, … Abstract The four authors present their speculations about the future developments of mathematical logic in the twenty-first century. The areas of recursion theory, proof theory and logic for computer science, model theory, and set theory are discussed independently.
A criterion is given for a strong type in a finite rank stable theory $T$ to be (almost) internal to a given nonmodular minimal type. The motivation comes from results … A criterion is given for a strong type in a finite rank stable theory $T$ to be (almost) internal to a given nonmodular minimal type. The motivation comes from results of Campana which give criteria for a compact complex analytic space to be “algebraic” (namely Moishezon). The canonical base property for a stable theory states that the type of the canonical base of a stationary type over a realisation is almost internal to the minimal types of the theory. It is conjectured that every finite rank stable theory has the canonical base property. It is shown here, that in a theory with the canonical base property, if $p$ is a stationary type for which there exists a family of types $q_b$, each internal to a nonlocally modular minimal type $r$, and such that any pair of independent realisations of $p$ are “connected” by the $q_b$’s, then $p$ is almost internal to $r$.
The notion of a normal theory such a theory <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper T comma upper I left-parenthesis normal alef 0 comma upper T right-parenthesis equals 1 or greater-than-or-slanted-equals … The notion of a normal theory such a theory <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper T comma upper I left-parenthesis normal alef 0 comma upper T right-parenthesis equals 1 or greater-than-or-slanted-equals normal alef 0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mspace width="thickmathspace" /> <mml:mi>I</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℵ<!-- ℵ --></mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mtext> or </mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⩾<!-- ⩾ --></mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℵ<!-- ℵ --></mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">T,\;I({\aleph _0},T) = 1{\text { or }} \geqslant {\aleph _0}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. theorem that for superstable <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper T comma upper I left-parenthesis normal alef 0 comma upper T right-parenthesis equals 1 or greater-than-or-slanted-equals normal alef 0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mspace width="thickmathspace" /> <mml:mi>I</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℵ<!-- ℵ --></mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mtext> or </mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⩾<!-- ⩾ --></mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℵ<!-- ℵ --></mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">T,\;I({\aleph _0},T) = 1{\text { or }} \geqslant {\aleph _0}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> stronger than stability but incomparable is introduced, and it is proved that for We also include a short proof of Lachlan’s (The property of normality is to superstability.)
We discuss various relationships between the algebraic Dgroups of Buium, 1992, and differential Galois theory.In the first part we give another exposition of our general differential Galois theory, which is … We discuss various relationships between the algebraic Dgroups of Buium, 1992, and differential Galois theory.In the first part we give another exposition of our general differential Galois theory, which is somewhat more explicit than Pillay, 1998, and where generalized logarithmic derivatives on algebraic groups play a central role.In the second part we prove some results with a "constrained Galois cohomological flavor".For example, if G and H are connected algebraic D-groups over an algebraically closed differential field F , and G and H are isomorphic over some differential field extension of F , then they are isomorphic over some Picard-Vessiot extension of F .Suitable generalizations to isomorphisms of algebraic D-varieties are also given.
Abstract A theory T is called almost 𝒩 0 ‐categorical if for any pure types p 1 ( x 1 ),…, p n (x n ) there are only finitely … Abstract A theory T is called almost 𝒩 0 ‐categorical if for any pure types p 1 ( x 1 ),…, p n (x n ) there are only finitely many pure types which extend p 1 ( x 1 ) ∪…∪ p n (x n ) . It is shown that if T is an almost 𝒩 0 ‐categorical theory with I (𝒩 0 , T ) = 3, then a dense linear ordering is interpretable in T .
CM -triviality of a stable theory is a notion introduced by Hrushovski [1]. The importance of this property is first that it holds of Hrushovski's new non 1-based strongly minimal … CM -triviality of a stable theory is a notion introduced by Hrushovski [1]. The importance of this property is first that it holds of Hrushovski's new non 1-based strongly minimal sets, and second that it is still quite a restrictive property, and forbids the existence of definable fields or simple groups (see [2]). In [5], Frank Wagner posed some questions about CM -triviality, asking in particular whether a structure of finite rank, which is “coordinatized” by CM -trivial types of rank 1, is itself CM -trivial. (Actually Wagner worked in a slightly more general context, adapting the definitions to a certain “local” framework, in which algebraic closure is replaced by P -closure, for P some family of types. We will, however, remain in the standard context, and will just remark here that it is routine to translate our results into Wagner's framework, as well as to generalise to the superstable theory/regular type context.) In any case we answer Wagner's question positively. Also in an attempt to put forward some concrete conjectures about the possible geometries of strongly minimal sets (or stable theories) we tentatively suggest a hierarchy of geometric properties of forking, the first two levels of which correspond to 1-basedness and CM -triviality respectively. We do not know whether this is a strict hierarchy (or even whether these are the “right” notions), but we conjecture that it is, and moreover that a counterexample to Cherlin's conjecture can be found at level three in the hierarchy.
Let M be an O-minimal structure. We use our understanding, acquired in [KPS], of the structure of definable sets of n -tuples in M , to study definable (in M … Let M be an O-minimal structure. We use our understanding, acquired in [KPS], of the structure of definable sets of n -tuples in M , to study definable (in M ) equivalence relations on M n . In particular, we show that if E is an A -definable equivalence relation on M n ( A ⊂ M ) then E has only finitely many classes with nonempty interior in M n , each such class being moreover also A -definable. As a consequence, we are able to give some conditions under which an O -minimal theory T eliminates imaginaries (in the sense of Poizat [P]). If L is a first order language and M an L -structure, then by a definable set in M , we mean something of the form X ⊂ M n , n ≥ 1, where X = {( a 1 …, a n ) ∈ M n : M ⊨ ϕ (ā)} for some formula ∈ L ( M ). (Here L ( M ) means L together with names for the elements of M .) If the parameters from come from a subset A of M , we say that X is A-definable . M is said to be O-minimal if M = ( M , &lt;,…), where &lt; is a dense linear order with no first or last element, and every definable set X ⊂ M is a finite union of points, and intervals ( a, b ) (where a, b ∈ M ∪ {± ∞}). (This notion is as in [PS] except here we demand the underlying order be dense.) The complete theory T is said to be O-minimal if every model of T is O-minimal. (Note that in [KPS] it is proved that if M is O-minimal, then T = Th( M ) is O-minimal.) In the remainder of this section and in §2, M will denote a fixed but arbitrary O-minimal structure. A,B,C,… will denote subsets of M .
We prove that if y" = f(y,y',t,\alpha, \beta,..) is a generic Painleve equation (i.e. an equation in one of the families PI-PVI but with the complex parameters \alpha, \beta,.. algebraically … We prove that if y" = f(y,y',t,\alpha, \beta,..) is a generic Painleve equation (i.e. an equation in one of the families PI-PVI but with the complex parameters \alpha, \beta,.. algebraically independent) then any algebraic dependence over C(t) between a set of solutions and their derivatives (y_1,..,y_n,y_1',..,y_n') is witnessed by a pair of solutions and their derivatives (y_i,y_i',y_j,y_j'). The proof combines work by the Japanese school on "irreducibility" of the Painleve equations, with the trichomoty theorem for strongly minimal sets in differentially closed fields.
§1. Introduction . In this report we wish to describe recent work on a class of first order theories first introduced by Shelah in [32], the simple theories. Major progress … §1. Introduction . In this report we wish to describe recent work on a class of first order theories first introduced by Shelah in [32], the simple theories. Major progress was made in the first author's doctoral thesis [17]. We will give a survey of this, as well as further works by the authors and others. The class of simple theories includes stable theories, but also many more, such as the theory of the random graph. Moreover, many of the theories of particular algebraic structures which have been studied recently (pseudofinite fields, algebraically closed fields with a generic automorphism, smoothly approximable structures) turn out to be simple. The interest is basically that a large amount of the machinery of stability theory, invented by Shelah, is valid in the broader class of simple theories. Stable theories will be defined formally in the next section. An exhaustive study of them is carried out in [33]. Without trying to read Shelah's mind, we feel comfortable in saying that the importance of stability for Shelah lay partly in the fact that an unstable theory T has 2 λ many models in any cardinal λ ≥ ω 1 + | T | (proved by Shelah). (Note that for λ ≥ | T | 2 λ is the maximum possible number of models of cardinality λ.)
We give a model-theoretic interpretation of a result by Campana and Fujiki on the algebraicity of certain spaces of cycles on compact complex spaces. The model-theoretic interpretation is in the … We give a model-theoretic interpretation of a result by Campana and Fujiki on the algebraicity of certain spaces of cycles on compact complex spaces. The model-theoretic interpretation is in the language of canonical bases, and says that if $b,c$ are tupl
We take a fixed countable model M 0 , and we look at the structure of and number of its countable elementary extensions (up to isomorphism over M 0 ). … We take a fixed countable model M 0 , and we look at the structure of and number of its countable elementary extensions (up to isomorphism over M 0 ). Assuming that S ( M 0 ) is countable, we prove that if N is a weakly minimal extension of , and if then there is an elementary embedding of N into M over M 0 ), then N is homogeneous over M 0 . Moreover the condition that ∣ S ( M 0 )∣ = ℵ 0 cannot be removed. Under the hypothesis that M 0 contains no infinite set of tuples ordered by a formula, we prove that M 0 has infinitely many countable elementary extensions up to isomorphism over M 0 . A preliminary result is that all types over M 0 are definable, and moreover is definable over M 0 if and only if is definable over M 0 (forking symmetry). We also introduce a notion of relative homogeneity, and show that a large class of elementary extensions of M 0 are relatively homogeneous over M 0 (under the assumptions that M 0 has no order and S ( M 0 ) is countable). I will now discuss the background to and motivation behind the results in this paper, and also the place of this paper relative to other conjectures and investigations. To simplify notation let T denote the complete diagram of M 0 . First, our result that if M 0 has no order then T has infinitely many countable models is related to the following conjecture: any theory with a finite number (more than one) of countable models is unstable.
We prove an analogue of the Lindemann-Weierstrass theorem (that the exponentials of a $\mathbb {Q}$-linearly independent set of algebraic numbers are algebraically independent), replacing $\mathbb {Q}^{alg}$ by $\mathbb {C}(t)^{alg}$ and … We prove an analogue of the Lindemann-Weierstrass theorem (that the exponentials of a $\mathbb {Q}$-linearly independent set of algebraic numbers are algebraically independent), replacing $\mathbb {Q}^{alg}$ by $\mathbb {C}(t)^{alg}$ and $\mathbb {G}_{m}^{n}$ by a semi-abelian variety over $\mathbb {C}(t)^{alg}$. Both the formulations of our results and the methods are differential algebraic in nature.
In this paper we introduce the notion of a first order topological structure, and consider various possible conditions on the complexity of the definable sets in such a structure, drawing … In this paper we introduce the notion of a first order topological structure, and consider various possible conditions on the complexity of the definable sets in such a structure, drawing several consequences thereof. Our aim is to develop, for a restricted class of unstable theories, results analogous to those for stable theories. The “material basis” for such an endeavor is the analogy between the field of real numbers and the field of complex numbers, the former being a “nicely behaved” unstable structure and the latter the archetypal stable structure. In this sense we try here to situate our work on o -minimal structures [PS] in a general topological context. Note, however, that the p -adic numbers, and structures definable therein, will also fit into our analysis. In the remainder of this section we discuss several ways of studying topological structures model-theoretically. Eventually we fix on the notion of a structure in which the topology is “explicitly definable” in the sense of Flum and Ziegler [FZ]. In §2 we introduce the hypothesis that every definable set is a Boolean combination of definable open sets. In §3 we introduce a “dimension rank” on (closed) definable sets. In §4 we consider structures on which this rank is defined, and for which also every definable set has a finite number of definably connected definable components. We show that prime models over sets exist under such conditions.
We prove that if $G$ is an algebraic $D$-group (in the sense of Buium over a differentially closed field $(K,\partial )$ of characteristic $0$, then the first order structure consisting … We prove that if $G$ is an algebraic $D$-group (in the sense of Buium over a differentially closed field $(K,\partial )$ of characteristic $0$, then the first order structure consisting of $G$ together with the algebraic $D$-subvarieties of $G, G\times G,\dots$, has quantifier-elimination. In other words, the projection on $G^{n}$ of a $D$-constructible subset of $G^{n+1}$ is $D$-constructible. Among the consequences is that any finite-dimensional differential algebraic group is interpretable in an algebraically closed field.
We prove that the generic type of the (theory of the) free group $F_{n}$ on $n\geq 2$ generators has infinite weight, strengthening the well-known result that these free groups are … We prove that the generic type of the (theory of the) free group $F_{n}$ on $n\geq 2$ generators has infinite weight, strengthening the well-known result that these free groups are not superstable. A preliminary result, possibly of independent interest, is that the realizations in $F_{n}$ of the generic type are precisely the primitives.
For G a group definable in some structure M, we define notions of "definable" compactification of G and "definable" action of G on a compact space X (definable G-flow), where … For G a group definable in some structure M, we define notions of "definable" compactification of G and "definable" action of G on a compact space X (definable G-flow), where the latter is under a definability of types assumption on M. We describe the universal definable compactification of G as G⁎/(G⁎)M00 and the universal definable G-ambit as the type space SG(M). We also point out the existence and uniqueness of "universal minimal definable G-flows", and discuss issues of amenability and extreme amenability in this definable category, with a characterization of the latter. For the sake of completeness we also describe the universal (Bohr) compactification and universal G-ambit in model-theoretic terms, when G is a topological group (although it is essentially well-known).
Let A be a semi-abelian variety, and X a subvariety of A , both defined over a number field. Assume that X does not contain X 1 + X 2 … Let A be a semi-abelian variety, and X a subvariety of A , both defined over a number field. Assume that X does not contain X 1 + X 2 for any positive-dimensional subvarieties X 1 , X 2 of A . Let Γ be a subgroup of A ( C ) of finite rational rank. We give doubly exponential bounds for the size of ( X ∩ Γ)\ X ( Ǭ ). Among the ingredients is a uniform bound, doubly exponential in the data, on finite sets which are quantifier-free definable in differentially closed fields. We also give uniform bounds on X ∩ Γ in the case where X contains no translate of any semi-abelian subvariety of A and Γ is a subgroup of A ( C ) of finite rational rank which has trivial intersection with A ( Ǭ ). (Here A is assumed to be defined over a number field, but X need not be.)
We study model-theoretic and stability-theoretic properties of the non-abelian free group in the light of Sela's recent result on stability and results announced by Bestvina and Feighn on ‘negligible subsets' … We study model-theoretic and stability-theoretic properties of the non-abelian free group in the light of Sela's recent result on stability and results announced by Bestvina and Feighn on ‘negligible subsets' of free groups. We point out analogies between the free group and so-called bad groups of finite Morley rank, and prove ‘non-CM-triviality' of the free group.
We make several observations about the category C of compact complex manifolds, considered as a many-sorted structure of finite Morley rank. We also point out that the Mordell-Lang conjecture holds … We make several observations about the category C of compact complex manifolds, considered as a many-sorted structure of finite Morley rank. We also point out that the Mordell-Lang conjecture holds for complex tori: if A is a complex torus, Γ a finitely generated subgroup of A, and X an analytic subvariety of A, then X ∩ Γ is a finite union of translates of subgroups of A. This is implicit in the literature but we give an elementary reduction to the abelian variety case. We discuss analogies between C and the category of finite dimensional differential algebraic sets. (A brief survey of the Mordell-Lang conjecture and model-theoretic contributions is also included.)
We first give simplified and corrected accounts of some results in work by Pillay (2017) on compactifications of pseudofinite groups. For instance, we use a classical theorem of Turing (1938) … We first give simplified and corrected accounts of some results in work by Pillay (2017) on compactifications of pseudofinite groups. For instance, we use a classical theorem of Turing (1938) to give a simplified proof that any definable compactification of a pseudofinite group has an abelian connected component. We then discuss the relationship between Turing’s work, the Jordan–Schur theorem, and a (relatively) more recent result of Kazhdan (1982) on approximate homomorphisms, and we use this to widen our scope from finite groups to amenable groups. In particular, we develop a suitable continuous logic framework for dealing with definable homomorphisms from pseudoamenable groups to compact Lie groups. Together with the stabilizer theorems of Hrushovski (2012) and Montenegro et al. (2020), we obtain a uniform (but non-quantitative) analogue of Bogolyubov’s lemma for sets of positive measure in discrete amenable groups. We conclude with brief remarks on the case of amenable topological groups.
We show that the free module of infinite rank $R^{(\kappa)}$ purely embeds every $\kappa$-generated flat left $R$-module iff $R$ is left perfect. Using a Bass module corresponding to a descending … We show that the free module of infinite rank $R^{(\kappa)}$ purely embeds every $\kappa$-generated flat left $R$-module iff $R$ is left perfect. Using a Bass module corresponding to a descending chain of principal right ideals, we construct a model of the theory $T$ of $R^{(\kappa)}$ whose projectivity is equivalent to left perfectness, which allows to add a `stronger' equivalent condition: $R^{(\kappa)}$ purely embeds every $\kappa$-generated flat left $R$-module which is a model of $T$. We extend the model-theoretic construction of this Bass module to arbitrary descending chains of pp formulas, resulting in a `Bass theory' of pure-projective modules. We put this new theory to use by, among other things, reproving an old result of Daniel Simson about pure-semisimple rings and Mittag-Leffler modules. This paper is a condensed version, solely about modules, of our larger work arXiv:2407.15864, with two new results added about cyclically presented modules (Cor.14) and finitely presented cyclic modules (Rem.15).
We give an 'arithmetic regularity lemma' for groups definable in finite fields, analogous to Tao's 'algebraic regularity lemma' for graphs definable in finite fields. More specifically, we show that, for … We give an 'arithmetic regularity lemma' for groups definable in finite fields, analogous to Tao's 'algebraic regularity lemma' for graphs definable in finite fields. More specifically, we show that, for any $M>0$, any finite field $\mathbf{F}$, and any definable group $(G,\cdot)$ in $\mathbf{F}$ and definable subset $D\subseteq G$, each of complexity at most $M$, there is a normal definable subgroup $H\leqslant G$, of index and complexity $O_M(1)$, such that the following holds: for any cosets $V,W$ of $H$, the bipartite graph $(V,W,xy^{-1}\in D)$ is $O_M(|\mathbf{F}|^{-1/2})$-quasirandom. Various analogous regularity conditions follow; for example, for any $g\in G$, the Fourier coefficient $||\widehat{1}_{H\cap Dg}(\pi)||_{\mathrm{op}}$ is $O_M(|\mathbf{F}|^{-1/8})$ for every non-trivial irreducible representation $\pi$ of $H$.
Let K be a differential field with algebraically closed field of constants CK. Let KPV∞ be the (iterated) Picard-Vessiot closure of K. Let G be a linear differential algebraic group … Let K be a differential field with algebraically closed field of constants CK. Let KPV∞ be the (iterated) Picard-Vessiot closure of K. Let G be a linear differential algebraic group over K, and X a differential algebraic torsor for G over K. We prove that X(KPV∞) is Kolchin dense in X. In the special case that G is finite-dimensional we prove that X(KPV∞)=X(Kdiff) (where Kdiff is the differential closure of K). We also give close relationships between Picard-Vessiot extensions of K and the category of torsors for suitable finite-dimensional linear differential algebraic groups over K.
We adapt the notion of a (relatively) definable subset of Aut(M) when M is a saturated model to the case Aut(M/A) when M is atomic and strongly omega-homogeneous over A. … We adapt the notion of a (relatively) definable subset of Aut(M) when M is a saturated model to the case Aut(M/A) when M is atomic and strongly omega-homogeneous over A. We discuss the existence and uniqueness of invariant measures on the Boolean algebra of definable subsets of Aut(M/A). For example when Th(M) is stable we have existence and uniqueness. We also discuss the compatibility of our definability notions with definable Galois cohomology and differential Galois theory.
Abstract As a continuation of the work of the third author in [5], we make further observations on the features of Galois cohomology in the general model theoretic context. We … Abstract As a continuation of the work of the third author in [5], we make further observations on the features of Galois cohomology in the general model theoretic context. We make explicit the connection between forms of definable groups and first cohomology sets with coefficients in a suitable automorphism group. We then use a method of twisting cohomology (inspired by Serre’s algebraic twisting) to describe arbitrary fibres in cohomology sequences—yielding a useful “finiteness” result on cohomology sets. Applied to the special case of differential fields and Kolchin’s constrained cohomology, we complete results from [3] by proving that the first constrained cohomology set of a differential algebraic group over a bounded, differentially large, field is countable.
We continue our study from Peterzil et al. (2022, Preprint, arXiv:2208.08293) of finite-dimensional definable groups in models of the theory $T_{\partial }$, the model companion of an o-minimal ${\mathcal {L}}$-theory … We continue our study from Peterzil et al. (2022, Preprint, arXiv:2208.08293) of finite-dimensional definable groups in models of the theory $T_{\partial }$, the model companion of an o-minimal ${\mathcal {L}}$-theory T expanded by a generic derivation $\partial $ as in Fornasiero and Kaplan (2021, Journal of Mathematical Logic 21, 2150007).We generalize Buium's notion of an algebraic D-group to ${\mathcal {L}}$-definable D-groups, namely $(G,s)$, where G is an ${\mathcal {L}}$-definable group in a model of T, and $s:G\to \tau (G)$ is an ${\mathcal {L}}$-definable group section. Our main theorem says that every definable group of finite dimension in a model of $T_\partial $ is definably isomorphic to a group of the form $$ \begin{align*}(G,s)^\partial=\{g\in G:s(g)=\nabla g\},\end{align*} $$for some ${\mathcal {L}}$-definable D-group $(G,s)$ (where $\nabla (g)=(g,\partial g)$).We obtain analogous results when T is either the theory of p-adically closed fields or the theory of pseudo-finite fields of characteristic $0$.
We prove a structure theorem for stable functions on amenable groups, which extends the arithmetic regularity lemma for stable subsets of finite groups. Given a group $G$, a function $f\colon … We prove a structure theorem for stable functions on amenable groups, which extends the arithmetic regularity lemma for stable subsets of finite groups. Given a group $G$, a function $f\colon G\to [-1,1]$ is called stable if the binary function $f(x\cdot y)$ is stable in the sense of continuous logic. Roughly speaking, our main result says that if $G$ is amenable, then any stable function on $G$ is almost constant on all translates of a unitary Bohr set in $G$ of bounded complexity. The proof uses ingredients from topological dynamics and continuous model theory. We also discuss some applications, including a short proof of the noncommutative analogue of Bogolyubov's Lemma for amenable groups.
For Ehud Hrushovski, on For Ehud Hrushovski, on
Abstract We prove an analytic version of the stable graph regularity lemma by Malliaris and Shelah (Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), no. 3, 1551–1585), which applies to stable functions … Abstract We prove an analytic version of the stable graph regularity lemma by Malliaris and Shelah (Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), no. 3, 1551–1585), which applies to stable functions . Our methods involve continuous model theory and, in particular, results on the structure of local Keisler measures for stable continuous formulas. Along the way, we develop some basic tools around ultraproducts of metric structures and linear functionals on continuous formulas, and we also describe several concrete families of examples of stable functions.
Abstract We discuss the role of weakly normal formulas in the theory of thorn forking, as part of a commentary on the paper [5]. We also give a counterexample to … Abstract We discuss the role of weakly normal formulas in the theory of thorn forking, as part of a commentary on the paper [5]. We also give a counterexample to Corollary 4.2 from that paper, and in the process discuss “theories with selectors.”
Abstract The aim of this paper is to develop the theory of groups definable in the p -adic field ${{\mathbb {Q}}_p}$ , with “definable f -generics” in the sense of … Abstract The aim of this paper is to develop the theory of groups definable in the p -adic field ${{\mathbb {Q}}_p}$ , with “definable f -generics” in the sense of an ambient saturated elementary extension of ${{\mathbb {Q}}_p}$ . We call such groups definable f-generic groups. So, by a “definable f -generic” or $dfg$ group we mean a definable group in a saturated model with a global f -generic type which is definable over a small model. In the present context the group is definable over ${{\mathbb {Q}}_p}$ , and the small model will be ${{\mathbb {Q}}_p}$ itself. The notion of a $\mathrm {dfg}$ group is dual, or rather opposite to that of an $\operatorname {\mathrm {fsg}}$ group (group with “finitely satisfiable generics”) and is a useful tool to describe the analogue of torsion-free o -minimal groups in the p -adic context. In the current paper our group will be definable over ${{\mathbb {Q}}_p}$ in an ambient saturated elementary extension $\mathbb {K}$ of ${{\mathbb {Q}}_p}$ , so as to make sense of the notions of f -generic type, etc. In this paper we will show that every definable f -generic group definable in ${{\mathbb {Q}}_p}$ is virtually isomorphic to a finite index subgroup of a trigonalizable algebraic group over ${{\mathbb {Q}}_p}$ . This is analogous to the o -minimal context, where every connected torsion-free group definable in $\mathbb {R}$ is isomorphic to a trigonalizable algebraic group [5, Lemma 3.4]. We will also show that every open definable f -generic subgroup of a definable f -generic group has finite index, and every f -generic type of a definable f -generic group is almost periodic, which gives a positive answer to the problem raised in [28] of whether f -generic types coincide with almost periodic types in the p -adic case.
Characterizing neural networks in terms of better-understood formal systems has the potential to yield new insights into the power and limitations of these networks. Doing so for transformers remains an … Characterizing neural networks in terms of better-understood formal systems has the potential to yield new insights into the power and limitations of these networks. Doing so for transformers remains an active area of research. Bhattamishra and others have shown that transformer encoders are at least as expressive as a certain kind of counter machine, while Merrill and Sabharwal have shown that fixed-precision transformer encoders recognize only languages in uniform $TC^0$. We connect and strengthen these results by identifying a variant of first-order logic with counting quantifiers that is simultaneously an upper bound for fixed-precision transformer encoders and a lower bound for transformer encoders. This brings us much closer than before to an exact characterization of the languages that transformer encoders recognize.
In \cite{Pillay} and more formally in \cite{Onshuus-Pillay} it was asked whether open subgroups of $p$-adic algebraic groups are ($p$-adic) semialgebraic, equivalently, definable in the structure $(\mathbb Q_{p}, +, \times)$. We … In \cite{Pillay} and more formally in \cite{Onshuus-Pillay} it was asked whether open subgroups of $p$-adic algebraic groups are ($p$-adic) semialgebraic, equivalently, definable in the structure $(\mathbb Q_{p}, +, \times)$. We give a positive answer in the commutative case. Together with results of \cite{Prasad} this leads to a positive answer for reductive algebraic groups.
We continue our earlier study of finite dimensional definable groups in models of the the model companion of an o-minimal L-theory T expanded by a generic derivation as in [F-K]. … We continue our earlier study of finite dimensional definable groups in models of the the model companion of an o-minimal L-theory T expanded by a generic derivation as in [F-K]. We generalize Buium's notion of an algebraic D-group to L-definable D-groups, namely (G,s), where G is a L-definable group in a model of T, and s is an L-definable group section into the prolongation of G. Our main theorem says that every definable group of finite dimension in a model of the theory is definably isomorphic to the ``sharp'' points of an L-definable D-group. We obtain analogous results when T is either the theory of p-adically closed fields or the theory of pseudo-finite fields of characteristic zero.
We give an example of an NIP theory $T$ in which there is a formula that does not fork over $\varnothing$ but has measure $0$ under any global $\varnothing$-invariant Keisler … We give an example of an NIP theory $T$ in which there is a formula that does not fork over $\varnothing$ but has measure $0$ under any global $\varnothing$-invariant Keisler measure, and we show that this cannot occur if $T$ is also first-order amenable.
Let K be differential field with algebraically closed field of constants. Let K^diff be a differential closure of K, and L the (iterated) Picard-Vessiot closure of K inside K^diff. Let … Let K be differential field with algebraically closed field of constants. Let K^diff be a differential closure of K, and L the (iterated) Picard-Vessiot closure of K inside K^diff. Let G be a linear differential algebraic group over K and X a differential algebraic torsor for G over K. We prove that X(L) is Kolchin-dense in X. When G is finite-dimensional we prove that X(L) = X(K^diff). We give close relationships between Picard-Vessiot extensions of K and torsors for suitable finite-dimensional linear differential algebraic groups over K. We suggest some differential field analogues of the notion of boundedness for fields (Serre's property F).
We first give simplified and corrected accounts of some results in \cite{PiRCP} on compactifications of pseudofinite groups. For instance, we use a classical theorem of Turing \cite{Turing} to give a … We first give simplified and corrected accounts of some results in \cite{PiRCP} on compactifications of pseudofinite groups. For instance, we use a classical theorem of Turing \cite{Turing} to give a simplified proof that any definable compactification of a pseudofinite group has an abelian connected component. We then discuss the relationship between Turing's work, the Jordan-Schur Theorem, and a (relatively) more recent result of Kazhdan \cite{Kazh} on approximate homomorphisms, and we use this to widen our scope from finite groups to amenable groups. In particular, we develop a suitable continuous logic framework for dealing with definable homomorphisms from pseudo-amenable groups to compact Lie groups. Together with the stabilizer theorems of \cite{HruAG,MOS}, we obtain a uniform (but non-quantitative) analogue of Bogolyubov's Lemma for sets of positive measure in discrete amenable groups. We conclude with brief remarks on the case of amenable topological groups.
The parameter identifiability problem for a dynamical system is to determine whether the parameters of the system can be found from data for the outputs of the system. Verifying whether … The parameter identifiability problem for a dynamical system is to determine whether the parameters of the system can be found from data for the outputs of the system. Verifying whether the parameters are identifiable is a necessary first step before a meaningful parameter estimation can take place. Non-identifiability occurs in practical models. To reparametrize a model to achieve identifiability is a challenge. The existing approaches have been shown to be useful for many important examples. However, these approaches are either limited to linear models and scaling parametrizations or are not guaranteed to find a reparametrization even if it exists. In the present paper, we prove that there always exists a locally identifiable model with the same input-output behaviour as the original one obtained from a given one by a partial specialization of the parameters. Furthermore, we give a sufficient observability condition for the existence of a state space transformation from the original model to the new one. Our proof is constructive and can be translated to an algorithm, which we illustrate by several examples.
We give a proof of the existence of generalized definable locally compact models for arbitrary approximate subgroups via an application of topological dynamics in model theory. Our construction is simpler … We give a proof of the existence of generalized definable locally compact models for arbitrary approximate subgroups via an application of topological dynamics in model theory. Our construction is simpler and shorter than the original one obtained by Hrushovski in ``Beyond the Lascar group'', and it uses only basic model theory (mostly spaces of types and realizations of types). The main tools are Ellis groups from topological dynamics considered for suitable spaces of types. However, we need to redevelop some basic theory of topological dynamics for suitable ``locally compact flows'' in place of (compact) flows. We also prove that the generalized definable locally compact model which we constructed is universal in an appropriate category. We note that the main result yields structural information on definable generic subsets of definable groups, with a more precise structural result for generics in the universal cover of $\textrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{R})$.
Abstract We give a model-theoretic treatment of the fundamental results of Kechris-Pestov-Todorčević theory in the more general context of automorphism groups of not necessarily countable structures. One of the main … Abstract We give a model-theoretic treatment of the fundamental results of Kechris-Pestov-Todorčević theory in the more general context of automorphism groups of not necessarily countable structures. One of the main points is a description of the universal ambit as a certain space of types in an expanded language. Using this, we recover results of Kechris et al. (Funct Anal 15:106–189, 2005), Moore (Fund Math 220:263–280, 2013), Ngyuen Van Thé (Fund Math 222: 19–47, 2013), in the context of automorphism groups of not necessarily countable structures, as well as Zucker (Trans Am Math Soc 368, 6715–6740, 2016).
We give examples of (i) a simple theory with a formula (with parameters) which does not fork over [Formula: see text] but has [Formula: see text]-measure 0 for every automorphism … We give examples of (i) a simple theory with a formula (with parameters) which does not fork over [Formula: see text] but has [Formula: see text]-measure 0 for every automorphism invariant Keisler measure [Formula: see text] and (ii) a definable group [Formula: see text] in a simple theory such that [Formula: see text] is not definably amenable, i.e. there is no translation invariant Keisler measure on [Formula: see text]. We also discuss paradoxical decompositions both in the setting of discrete groups and of definable groups, and prove some positive results about small theories, including the definable amenability of definable groups.
Structural identifiability is a property of an ODE model with parameters that allows for the parameters to be determined from continuous noise-free data. This is a natural prerequisite for practical … Structural identifiability is a property of an ODE model with parameters that allows for the parameters to be determined from continuous noise-free data. This is a natural prerequisite for practical identifiability. Conducting multiple independent experiments could make more parameters or functions of parameters identifiable, which is a desirable property to have. How many experiments are sufficient? In the present paper, we provide an algorithm to determine the exact number of experiments for multi-experiment local identifiability and obtain an upper bound that is off at most by one for the number of experiments for multi-experiment global identifiability. Interestingly, the main theoretical ingredient of the algorithm has been discovered and proved using model theory (in the sense of mathematical logic). Based on the insights from the model-theoretic argument, an algebraic proof presented in the paper was obtained. We hope that this unexpected connection will stimulate interactions between applied algebra and model theory, and we provide a short introduction to model theory in the context of parameter identifiability. As another related application of model theory in this area, we construct a nonlinear ODE system with one output such that single-experiment and multiple-experiment identifiability are different for the system. This contrasts with recent results about single-output linear systems. We also present a Monte Carlo randomized version of the algorithm with a polynomial arithmetic complexity. Implementation of the algorithm is provided and its performance is demonstrated on several examples.
We exhibit Pontryagin duality as a special case of Stone duality in a continuous logic setting. More specifically, given an abelian topological group $A$, and $\mathcal F$ the family (group) … We exhibit Pontryagin duality as a special case of Stone duality in a continuous logic setting. More specifically, given an abelian topological group $A$, and $\mathcal F$ the family (group) of continuous homomorphisms from $A$ to the circle group $\mathbb T$, then, viewing $(A,+)$ equipped with the collection $\mathcal F$ as a continuous logic structure $M$, we show that the local type space $S_\mathcal F(M)$ is precisely the Pontryagin dual of the group $\mathcal F$ where the latter is considered as a discrete group. We conclude, using Pontryagin duality (between compact and discrete abelian groups), that $S_\mathcal F(M)$ is the Bohr compactification of the topological group $A$.
We study finite-dimensional groups definable in models of the theory of real closed fields with a generic derivation (also known as CODF). We prove that any such group definably embeds … We study finite-dimensional groups definable in models of the theory of real closed fields with a generic derivation (also known as CODF). We prove that any such group definably embeds in a semialgebraic group. We extend the results to several more general contexts; strongly model complete theories of large geometric fields with a generic derivation, model complete o-minimal expansions of RCF with a generic derivation, open theories of topological fields with a generic derivation. We also give a general theorem on recovering a definable group from generic data in the context of geometric structures.
Abstract We study amenability of definable groups and topological groups, and prove various results, briefly described below. Among our main technical tools, of interest in its own right, is an … Abstract We study amenability of definable groups and topological groups, and prove various results, briefly described below. Among our main technical tools, of interest in its own right, is an elaboration on and strengthening of the Massicot-Wagner version (Massicot and Wagner in J Ec Polytech Math 2:55–63, 2015) of the stabilizer theorem (Hrushovski in J Am Math Soc 25:189–243, 2012), and also some results about measures and measure-like functions (which we call means and pre-means). As an application we show that if G is an amenable topological group, then the Bohr compactification of G coincides with a certain “weak Bohr compactification” introduced in Krupiński and Pillay (Adv Math 345:1253–1299, 2019). In other words, the conclusion says that certain connected components of G coincide: $$G^{00}_{{{\,\mathrm{{top}}\,}}} = G^{000}_{{{\,\mathrm{{top}}\,}}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace /> <mml:mi>top</mml:mi> <mml:mspace /> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>00</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace /> <mml:mi>top</mml:mi> <mml:mspace /> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>000</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . We also prove wide generalizations of this result, implying in particular its extension to a “definable-topological” context, confirming the main conjectures from Krupiński and Pillay (2019). We also introduce $$\bigvee $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>⋁</mml:mo> </mml:math> -definable group topologies on a given $$\emptyset $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>∅</mml:mi> </mml:math> -definable group G (including group topologies induced by type-definable subgroups as well as uniformly definable group topologies), and prove that the existence of a mean on the lattice of closed, type-definable subsets of G implies (under some assumption) that $${{\,\mathrm{{cl}}\,}}(G^{00}_M) = {{\,\mathrm{{cl}}\,}}(G^{000}_M)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace /> <mml:mi>cl</mml:mi> <mml:mspace /> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mn>00</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace /> <mml:mi>cl</mml:mi> <mml:mspace /> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mn>000</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for any model M . Secondly, we study the relationship between (separate) definability of an action of a definable group on a compact space [in the sense of Gismatullin et al. (Ann Pure Appl Log 165:552–562, 2014)], weakly almost periodic (wap) actions of G [in the sense of Ellis and Nerurkar (Trans Am Math Soc 313:103–119, 1989)], and stability. We conclude that any group G definable in a sufficiently saturated structure is “weakly definably amenable” in the sense of Krupiński and Pillay (2019), namely any definable action of G on a compact space supports a G -invariant probability measure. This gives negative solutions to some questions and conjectures raised in Krupiński (J Symb Log 82:1080–1105, 2017) and Krupiński and Pillay (2019). Stability in continuous logic will play a role in some proofs in this part of the paper. Thirdly, we give an example of a $$\emptyset $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>∅</mml:mi> </mml:math> -definable approximate subgroup X in a saturated extension of the group $${{\mathbb {F}}}_2 \times {{\mathbb {Z}}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in a suitable language (where $${{\mathbb {F}}}_2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> is the free group in 2-generators) for which the $$\bigvee $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>⋁</mml:mo> </mml:math> -definable group $$H:=\langle X \rangle $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mo>:</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo>⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mo>⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> contains no type-definable subgroup of bounded index. This refutes a conjecture by Wagner and shows that the Massicot-Wagner approach to prove that a locally compact (and in consequence also Lie) “model” exists for each approximate subgroup does not work in general (they proved in (Massicot and Wagner 2015) that it works for definably amenable approximate subgroups).
We prove an analytic version of the stable graph regularity lemma from \cite{MaSh}, which applies to stable functions $f\colon V\times W\to [0,1]$. Our methods involve continuous model theory and, in … We prove an analytic version of the stable graph regularity lemma from \cite{MaSh}, which applies to stable functions $f\colon V\times W\to [0,1]$. Our methods involve continuous model theory and, in particular, results on the structure of local Keisler measures for stable continuous formulas. Along the way, we develop some basic tools around ultraproducts of metric structures and linear functionals on continuous formulas, and we also describe several concrete families of examples of stable functions.
Parameter identifiability is a structural property of an ODE model for recovering the values of parameters from the data (i.e., from the input and output variables). This property is a … Parameter identifiability is a structural property of an ODE model for recovering the values of parameters from the data (i.e., from the input and output variables). This property is a prerequisite for meaningful parameter identification in practice. In the presence of nonidentifiability, it is important to find all functions of the parameters that are identifiable. The existing algorithms check whether a given function of parameters is identifiable or, under the solvability condition, find all identifiable functions. However, this solvability condition is not always satisfied, which presents a challenge. Our first main result is an algorithm that computes all identifiable functions without any additional assumptions, which is the first such algorithm as far as we know. Our second main result concerns the identifiability from multiple experiments (with generically different inputs and initial conditions among the experiments). For this problem, we prove that the set of functions identifiable from multiple experiments is what would actually be computed by input–output equation-based algorithms (whether or not the solvability condition is fulfilled), which was not known before. We give an algorithm that not only finds these functions but also provides an upper bound for the number of experiments to be performed to identify these functions. We provide an implementation of the presented algorithms.
Suppose G is a finite group and A\subseteq G is such that \{gA:g\in G\} has VC-dimension strictly less than k . We find algebraically well-structured sets in G which, up … Suppose G is a finite group and A\subseteq G is such that \{gA:g\in G\} has VC-dimension strictly less than k . We find algebraically well-structured sets in G which, up to a chosen \epsilon&gt;0 , describe the structure of A and behave regularly with respect to translates of A . For the subclass of groups with uniformly fixed finite exponent r , these algebraic objects are normal subgroups with index bounded in terms of k , r , and \epsilon . For arbitrary groups, we use Bohr neighborhoods of bounded rank and width inside normal subgroups of bounded index. Our proofs are largely model-theoretic, and heavily rely on a structural analysis of compactifications of pseudofinite groups as inverse limits of Lie groups. The introduction of Bohr neighborhoods into the nonabelian setting uses model-theoretic methods related to the work of Breuillard, Green, and Tao [8] and Hrushovski [28] on approximate groups, as well as a result of Alekseev, Glebskiĭ, and Gordon [1] on approximate homomorphisms.
This paper is about various ways in which groups arise or are of interest in model theory. In Section 1.1, I briefly introduce three important classes of first-order theories: stable … This paper is about various ways in which groups arise or are of interest in model theory. In Section 1.1, I briefly introduce three important classes of first-order theories: stable theories, simple theories, and NIP theories. Section 1.2 is about the classification of groups definable in specific theories or structures, mainly fields, and the relationship to algebraic groups. In Section 1.3, I study generalized stability and definable groups in more detail, giving the theory of “generic types” in the various contexts. I also discuss 1-based theories and groups. Section 1.4 is about the compact Hausdorff group G/G00 attached to a definable group and how it may carry information in various contexts (including approximate subgroups and arithmetic regularity). In Section 1.5, I discuss Galois theory, including the various Galois groups attached to first-order theories, various kinds of strong types, and definable groups of automorphisms. In Section 1.6, I study various points of interaction between topological dynamics and definable groups, in particular “Newelski’s conjecture” relating G/G00 to the “Ellis group”. And in Section 1.7, I touch on the model theory of the free group.
We give examples of (i) a simple theory with a formula (with parameters) which does not fork over the empty set but has mu measure 0 for every automorphism invariant … We give examples of (i) a simple theory with a formula (with parameters) which does not fork over the empty set but has mu measure 0 for every automorphism invariant Keisler measure mu, and (ii) a definable group G in a simple theory such that G is not definably amenable, i.e. there is no translation invariant Keisler measure on G We also discuss paradoxical decompositions both in the setting of discrete groups and of definable groups, and prove some positive results about small theories, including the definable amenability of definable groups, and nontriviality of the graded Grothendieck ring.
This is a largely expository paper about how groups arise or are of interest in model theory. Included are the following topics: classifying groups definable in specific structures or theories … This is a largely expository paper about how groups arise or are of interest in model theory. Included are the following topics: classifying groups definable in specific structures or theories and the relation to algebraic groups, groups definable in stable, simple and NIP theories, definable compactifications of groups, definable Galois theory (including differential Galois theory), connections with topological dynamics, model theory of the free group.
We prove an analytic version of the stable graph regularity lemma from \cite{MaSh}, which applies to stable functions $f\colon V\times W\to [0,1]$. Our methods involve continuous model theory and, in … We prove an analytic version of the stable graph regularity lemma from \cite{MaSh}, which applies to stable functions $f\colon V\times W\to [0,1]$. Our methods involve continuous model theory and, in particular, results on the structure of local Keisler measures for stable continuous formulas. Along the way, we develop some basic tools around ultraproducts of metric structures and linear functionals on continuous formulas, and we also describe several concrete families of examples of stable functions.
We generalize pp elimination for modules, or more generally abelian structures, to a continuous logic environment where the abelian structure is equipped with a homomorphism to a compact (Hausdorff) group. … We generalize pp elimination for modules, or more generally abelian structures, to a continuous logic environment where the abelian structure is equipped with a homomorphism to a compact (Hausdorff) group. We conclude that the continuous logic theory of such a structure is stable.
Suppose that $K$ is an infinite field which is large (in the sense of Pop) and whose first order theory is simple. We show that $K$ is bounded, namely has … Suppose that $K$ is an infinite field which is large (in the sense of Pop) and whose first order theory is simple. We show that $K$ is bounded, namely has only finitely many separable extensions of any given finite degree. We also show that any genus $0$ curve over $K$ has a $K$-point, if $K$ is additionally perfect then $K$ has trivial Brauer group, and if $v$ is a non-trivial valuation on $K$ then $(K,v)$ has separably closed Henselization, so in particular the residue field of $(K,v)$ is algebraically closed and the value group is divisible. These results give evidence towards the conjecture that large simple fields are bounded $\mathrm{PAC}$. Combining our results with a theorem of Lubotzky and van den Dries we show that there is a bounded $\mathrm{PAC}$ field $L$ with the same absolute Galois group as $K$.
We lay the foundations for a model theoretic study of proalgebraic groups. Our axiomatization is based on the tannakian philosophy. Through a tensor analog of skeletal categories we are able … We lay the foundations for a model theoretic study of proalgebraic groups. Our axiomatization is based on the tannakian philosophy. Through a tensor analog of skeletal categories we are able to consider neutral tannakian categories with a fibre functor as many-sorted first order structures. The class of diagonalizable proalgebraic groups is analyzed in detail. We show that the theory of a diagonalizable proalgebraic group <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is determined by the theory of the base field and the theory of the character group of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. Some initial steps towards a comprehensive study of types are also made.
Assuming that the differential field [Formula: see text] is differentially large, in the sense of [León Sánchez and Tressl, Differentially large fields, preprint (2020); arXiv:2005.00888], and “bounded” as a field, … Assuming that the differential field [Formula: see text] is differentially large, in the sense of [León Sánchez and Tressl, Differentially large fields, preprint (2020); arXiv:2005.00888], and “bounded” as a field, we prove that for any linear differential algebraic group [Formula: see text] over [Formula: see text], the differential Galois (or constrained) cohomology set [Formula: see text] is finite. This applies, among other things, to closed ordered differential fields in the sense of [Singer, The model theory of ordered differential fields, J. Symb. Logic 43(1) (1978) 82–91], and to closed[Formula: see text]-adic differential fields in the sense of [Tressl, The uniform companion for large differential fields of characteristic [Formula: see text], Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 357(10) (2005) 3933–3951]. As an application, we prove a general existence result for parameterized Picard–Vessiot (PPV) extensions within certain families of fields; if [Formula: see text] is a field with two commuting derivations, and [Formula: see text] is a parameterized linear differential equation over [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] is “differentially large” and [Formula: see text] is bounded, and [Formula: see text] is existentially closed in [Formula: see text], then there is a PPV extension [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] for the equation such that [Formula: see text] is existentially closed in [Formula: see text]. For instance, it follows that if the [Formula: see text]-constants of a formally real differential field [Formula: see text] is a closed ordered[Formula: see text]-field, then for any homogeneous linear [Formula: see text]-equation over [Formula: see text] there exists a PPV extension that is formally real. Similar observations apply to [Formula: see text]-adic fields.
We develop “local NIP group theory” in the context of pseudofinite groups. In particular, given a sufficiently saturated pseudofinite structure [Formula: see text] expanding a group, and left invariant NIP … We develop “local NIP group theory” in the context of pseudofinite groups. In particular, given a sufficiently saturated pseudofinite structure [Formula: see text] expanding a group, and left invariant NIP formula [Formula: see text], we prove various aspects of “local fsg” for the right-stratified formula [Formula: see text]. This includes a [Formula: see text]-type-definable connected component, uniqueness of the pseudofinite counting measure as a left-invariant measure on [Formula: see text]-formulas and generic compact domination for [Formula: see text]-definable sets.
Abstract We discuss the close relationship between structural theorems in (generalized) stability theory, and graph regularity theorems. Abstract We discuss the close relationship between structural theorems in (generalized) stability theory, and graph regularity theorems.
In [18] it was proved that if a differential field (K,δ) of characteristic 0 is algebraically closed and closed under Picard–Vessiot extensions then every differential algebraic PHS over K for … In [18] it was proved that if a differential field (K,δ) of characteristic 0 is algebraically closed and closed under Picard–Vessiot extensions then every differential algebraic PHS over K for a linear differential algebraic group G over K has a K-rational point (in fact if and only if). This paper explores whether and if so, how, this can be extended to (a) several commuting derivations, (b) one automorphism. Under a natural notion of “generalized Picard–Vessiot extension” (in the case of several derivations), we give a counterexample. We also have a counterexample in the case of one automorphism. We also formulate and prove some positive statements in the case of several derivations.
Parameter identifiability is a structural property of an ODE model for recovering the values of parameters from the data (i.e., from the input and output variables). This property is a … Parameter identifiability is a structural property of an ODE model for recovering the values of parameters from the data (i.e., from the input and output variables). This property is a prerequisite for meaningful parameter identification in practice. In the presence of nonidentifiability, it is important to find all functions of the parameters that are identifiable. The existing algorithms check whether a given function of parameters is identifiable or, under the solvability condition, find all identifiable functions. Our first main result is an algorithm that computes all identifiable functions without any additional assumptions. Our second main result concerns the identifiability from multiple experiments. For this problem, we show that the set of functions identifiable from multiple experiments is what would actually be computed by input-output equation-based algorithms if the solvability condition is not fulfilled. We give an algorithm that not only finds these functions but also provides an upper bound for the number of experiments to be performed to identify these functions.
Abstract This book gives an account of the fundamental results in geometric stability theory, a subject that has grown out of categoricity and classification theory. This approach studies the fine … Abstract This book gives an account of the fundamental results in geometric stability theory, a subject that has grown out of categoricity and classification theory. This approach studies the fine structure of models of stable theories, using the geometry of forking; this often achieves global results relevant to classification theory. Topics range from Zilber-Cherlin classification of infinite locally finite homogenous geometries, to regular types, their geometries, and their role in superstable theories. The structure and existence of definable groups is featured prominently, as is work by Hrushovski. The book is unique in the range and depth of material covered and will be invaluable to anyone interested in modern model theory.
We study forking, Lascar strong types, Keisler measures and definable groups, under an assumption of NIP (not the independence property), continuing aspects of the paper [16]. Among key results are … We study forking, Lascar strong types, Keisler measures and definable groups, under an assumption of NIP (not the independence property), continuing aspects of the paper [16]. Among key results are (i) if p = \mathrm{tp}(b/A) does not fork over A then the Lascar strong type of b over A coincides with the compact strong type of b over A and any global nonforking extension of p is Borel definable over \mathrm{bdd}(A) , (ii) analogous statements for Keisler measures and definable groups, including the fact that G^{000} = G^{00} for G definably amenable, (iii) definitions, characterizations and properties of “generically stable” types and groups, (iv) uniqueness of invariant (under the group action) Keisler measures on groups with finitely satisfiable generics, (v) a proof of the compact domination conjecture for (definably compact) commutative groups in o -minimal expansions of real closed fields.
We discuss measures, invariant measures on definable groups, and genericity, often in an NIP (failure of the independence property) environment. We complete the proof of the third author's conjectures relating … We discuss measures, invariant measures on definable groups, and genericity, often in an NIP (failure of the independence property) environment. We complete the proof of the third author's conjectures relating definably compact groups $G$ in saturated $o$-minimal structures to compact Lie groups. We also prove some other structural results about such $G$, for example the existence of a left invariant finitely additive probability measure on definable subsets of $G$. We finally introduce the new notion of "compact domination" (domination of a definable set by a compact space) and raise some new conjectures in the $o$-minimal case.
A hyperimaginary is an equivalence class of a type-definable equivalence relation on tuples of possibly infinite length. The notion was recently introduced in [1], mainly with reference to simple theories. … A hyperimaginary is an equivalence class of a type-definable equivalence relation on tuples of possibly infinite length. The notion was recently introduced in [1], mainly with reference to simple theories. It was pointed out there how hyperimaginaries still remain in a sense within the domain of first order logic. In this paper we are concerned with several issues: on the one hand, various levels of complexity of hyperimaginaries, and when hyperimaginaries can be reduced to simpler hyperimaginaries. On the other hand the issue of what information about hyperimaginaries in a saturated structure M can be obtained from the abstract group Aut(M) . In Section 2 we show that if T is simple and canonical bases of Lascar strong types exist in M eq then hyperimaginaries can be eliminated in favour of sequences of ordinary imaginaries. In Section 3, given a type-definable equivalence relation with a bounded number of classes, we show how the quotient space can be equipped with a certain compact topology. In Section 4 we study a certain group introduced in [5], which we call the Galois group of T , develop a Galois theory and make the connection with the ideas in Section 3. We also give some applications, making use of the structure of compact groups. One of these applications states roughly that bounded hyperimaginaries can be eliminated in favour of sequences of finitary hyperimaginaries. In Sections 3 and 4 there is some overlap with parts of Hrushovski's paper [2].
We give a proof of the geometric Mordell-Lang conjecture, in any characteristic. Our method involves a model-theoretic analysis of the kernel of Manin’s homomorphism and of a certain analog in … We give a proof of the geometric Mordell-Lang conjecture, in any characteristic. Our method involves a model-theoretic analysis of the kernel of Manin’s homomorphism and of a certain analog in characteristic <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="p"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">p</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>.
These lecture notes are based on the first section of Pillay's book \[3] and they cover fundamental notions of stability theory such as defi nable types, forking calculus and canonical … These lecture notes are based on the first section of Pillay's book \[3] and they cover fundamental notions of stability theory such as defi nable types, forking calculus and canonical bases, as well as stable groups and homogeneous spaces. The approach followed here is originally due to Hrushovski and Pillay \[2], who presented stability from a local point of view. Throughout the notes, some general knowledge of model theory is assumed. I recommend the book of Tent and Ziegler \[4] as an introduction to model theory. Furthermore, the texts of Casanovas \[1] and Wagner \[5] may also be useful to the reader to obtain a different approach to stability theory.
We characterize the Zariski topologies over an algebraically closed field in terms of general dimension-theoretic properties. Some applications are given to complex manifold and to strongly minimal sets. We characterize the Zariski topologies over an algebraically closed field in terms of general dimension-theoretic properties. Some applications are given to complex manifold and to strongly minimal sets.
Abstract We interpret the basic notions of topological dynamics in the model-theoretic setting, relating them to generic types of definable group actions and their generalizations. Abstract We interpret the basic notions of topological dynamics in the model-theoretic setting, relating them to generic types of definable group actions and their generalizations.
For G a group definable in some structure M, we define notions of "definable" compactification of G and "definable" action of G on a compact space X (definable G-flow), where … For G a group definable in some structure M, we define notions of "definable" compactification of G and "definable" action of G on a compact space X (definable G-flow), where the latter is under a definability of types assumption on M. We describe the universal definable compactification of G as G⁎/(G⁎)M00 and the universal definable G-ambit as the type space SG(M). We also point out the existence and uniqueness of "universal minimal definable G-flows", and discuss issues of amenability and extreme amenability in this definable category, with a characterization of the latter. For the sake of completeness we also describe the universal (Bohr) compactification and universal G-ambit in model-theoretic terms, when G is a topological group (although it is essentially well-known).
In this paper we solve some problems posed by Kolchin about differential algebraic groups.The main result (from which the others follow) is the embeddability of any differential algebraic group in … In this paper we solve some problems posed by Kolchin about differential algebraic groups.The main result (from which the others follow) is the embeddability of any differential algebraic group in an algebraic group.A crucial intermediate result, and one of independent interest, is a generalisation of Weil's theorem on recovering an algebraic group from birational data, to pro-algebraic groups.
The notion of forking has been introduced by Shelah, and a full treatment of it will appear in his book on stability [S1]. The principal aim of this paper is … The notion of forking has been introduced by Shelah, and a full treatment of it will appear in his book on stability [S1]. The principal aim of this paper is to show that it is an easy and natural notion. Consider some well-known examples of ℵ 0 -stable theories: vector spaces over Q , algebraically closed fields, differentially closed fields of characteristic 0; in each of these cases, we have a natural notion of independence: linear, algebraic and differential independence respectively. Forking gives a generalization of these notions. More precisely, if are subsets of some model and c a point of this model, the fact that the type of c over does not fork over means that there are no more relations of dependence between c and than there already existed between c and . In the case of the vector spaces, this means that c is in the space generated by only if it is already in the space generated by . In the case of differentially closed fields, this means that the minimal differential equations of c with coefficient respectively in and have the same order. Of course, these notions of dependence are essential for the study of the above mentioned structures. Forking is no less important for stable theories. A glance at Shelah's book will convince the reader that this is the case. What we have to do is the following. Assuming T stable and given and p a type on , we want to distinguish among the extensions of p to some of them that we shall call the nonforking extensions of p .
We formulate the measure analogue of generically stable types in first order theories with $NIP$ (without the independence property), giving several characterizations, answering some questions from an earlier paper by … We formulate the measure analogue of generically stable types in first order theories with $NIP$ (without the independence property), giving several characterizations, answering some questions from an earlier paper by Hrushovski and Pillay, and giving another treatment of uniqueness results from the same paper. We introduce a notion of "generic compact domination", relating it to stationarity of the Keisler measures, and also giving definable group versions. We also prove the "approximate definability" of arbitrary Borel probability measures on definable sets in the real and $p$-adic fields.
We note a parallel between some ideas of stable model theory and certain topics in finite combinatorics related to the sum-product phenomenon. For a simple linear group <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math … We note a parallel between some ideas of stable model theory and certain topics in finite combinatorics related to the sum-product phenomenon. For a simple linear group <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>, we show that a finite subset <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper X"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">X</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> with <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="StartAbsoluteValue upper X upper X Superscript negative 1 Baseline upper X EndAbsoluteValue slash StartAbsoluteValue upper X EndAbsoluteValue"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo>−<!-- − --></mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">|X X ^{-1}X |/ |X|</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> bounded is close to a finite subgroup, or else to a subset of a proper algebraic subgroup of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. We also find a connection with Lie groups, and use it to obtain some consequences suggestive of topological nilpotence. Model-theoretically we prove the independence theorem and the stabilizer theorem in a general first-order setting.
We study definably amenable NIP groups. We develop a theory of generics showing that various definitions considered previously coincide, and we study invariant measures. As applications, we characterize ergodic measures, … We study definably amenable NIP groups. We develop a theory of generics showing that various definitions considered previously coincide, and we study invariant measures. As applications, we characterize ergodic measures, give a proof of the conjecture of Petrykowski connecting existence of bounded orbits with definable amenability in the NIP case, and prove the Ellis group conjecture of Newelski and Pillay connecting the model-theoretic connected component of an NIP group with the ideal subgroup of its Ellis enveloping semigroup.
Conventions and notation background material from algebraic geometry general notions associated with algebraic groups homogeneous spaces solvable groups Borel subgroups reductive groups rationality questions. Conventions and notation background material from algebraic geometry general notions associated with algebraic groups homogeneous spaces solvable groups Borel subgroups reductive groups rationality questions.
Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G equals mathematical left-angle upper G comma dot mathematical right-angle"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> … Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G equals mathematical left-angle upper G comma dot mathematical right-angle"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}=\langle G, \cdot \rangle</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be a group definable in an o-minimal structure <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {M}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. A subset <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper H"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">H</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable if <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper H"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">H</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is definable in the structure <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="mathematical left-angle upper G comma dot mathematical right-angle"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\langle G,\cdot \rangle</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> (while <italic>definable</italic> means definable in the structure <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {M}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>). Assume <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> has no <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable proper subgroup of finite index. In this paper we prove that if <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> has no nontrivial abelian normal subgroup, then <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is the direct product of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable subgroups <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper H 1 comma ellipsis comma upper H Subscript k Baseline"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>…</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">H_1,\ldots ,H_k</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> such that each <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper H Subscript i"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">H_i</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is definably isomorphic to a semialgebraic linear group over a definable real closed field. As a corollary we obtain an o-minimal analogue of Cherlin’s conjecture.
Cet article ne contient rien de révolutionnaire, et son auteur a conscience du risque qu'il court de le voir dépassé, lors de sa parution, par des travaux plus profonds. Il … Cet article ne contient rien de révolutionnaire, et son auteur a conscience du risque qu'il court de le voir dépassé, lors de sa parution, par des travaux plus profonds. Il a pensé qu'il n'était pas inutile de publier, faute de mieux, les résultats simples auxquels il est parvenu (le lecteur lui saura gré de ce caractère reposant), en espérant qu'il passeront à la postérité sous forme d'exercices dans les manuels futurs où les petits enfants apprendront la théorie des modèles. Il s'agit de groupes stables; on sait depuis longtemps que la stabilité de la théorie d'un groupe impose des “conditions de chaîne” sur ses sous-groupes définissables : l'exploitation de ce phénomène, de nature bien algébrique, qui est brièvement exposé dans la première section de cet article, a fait le bonheur d'une génération de théoriciens des modèles. Un autre phénomène, plus subtil, semble ne pas avoir épuisé sa substance : c'est celui, dont l'apparition remonte aux travaux de B. Zilber, qui est décrit dans [7] sous le nom de “types de strate maximum”, et dans [2] sous le nom de “large sets”; la deuxième section lui est consacrée: elle a été écrite dans le désir de montrer l'équivalence de ces deux approches, et aussi par repentir de n'avoir pas suffisament éclairé ses motivations dans [7]. Ce souci d'unification a eu une influence, que j'espère salutaire, sur le vocabulaire: je parle ici de “types génériques” et d'“ensembles (ou de formules) génériques”. Ces termes, ainsi que celui de “composante connexe”, sont empruntés au langage de la géométrie: un groupe algébrique, étant définissable dans la théorie d'un corps algébriquement clos, est stable, et ses “types génériques” sont les “points génériques” des géomètres.
We study type-definable subgroups of small index in definable groups, and the structure on the quotient, in first order structures. We raise some conjectures in the case where the ambient … We study type-definable subgroups of small index in definable groups, and the structure on the quotient, in first order structures. We raise some conjectures in the case where the ambient structure is o-minimal. The gist is that in this o-minimal case, any definable group G should have a smallest type-definable subgroup of bounded index, and that the quotient, when equipped with the logic topology, should be a compact Lie group of the "right" dimension. I give positive answers to the conjectures in the special cases when G is 1-dimensional, and when G is definably simple.
This book is a modern introduction to model theory which stresses applications to algebra throughout the text. The first half of the book includes classical material on model construction techniques, … This book is a modern introduction to model theory which stresses applications to algebra throughout the text. The first half of the book includes classical material on model construction techniques, type spaces, prime models, saturated models, countable models, and indiscernibles and their applications. The author also includes an introduction to stability theory beginning with Morley's Categoricity Theorem and concentrating on omega-stable theories. One significant aspect of this text is the inclusion of chapters on important topics not covered in other introductory texts, such as omega-stable groups and the geometry of strongly minimal sets. The author then goes on to illustrate how these ingredients are used in Hrushovski's applications to diophantine geometry. David Marker is Professor of Mathematics at the University of Illinois at Chicago. His main area of research involves mathematical logic and model theory, and their applications to algebra and geometry. This book was developed from a series of lectures given by the author at the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute in 1998.
This article surveys the model theory of differentially closed fields, an interesting setting where one can use model-theoretic methods to obtain algebraic information. The article concludes with one example showing … This article surveys the model theory of differentially closed fields, an interesting setting where one can use model-theoretic methods to obtain algebraic information. The article concludes with one example showing how this information can be used in diophantine applications. A differential field is a field K equipped with a derivation δ : K → K; recall that this means that, for x, y ∈ K, we have δ(x + y) = δ(x) + δ(y) and δ(xy) = x δ(y) + yδ(x). Roughly speaking, such a field is called differentially closed when it contains enough solutions of ordinary differential equations. This setting allows one to use model-theoretic methods, and particularly dimensiontheoretic ideas, to obtain interesting algebraic information. In this lecture I give a survey of the model theory of differentially closed fields, concluding with an example — Hrushovski’s proof of the Mordell–Lang conjecture in characteristic zero — showing how model-theoretic methods in this area can be used in diophantine applications. I will not give the proofs of the main theorems. Most of the material in Sections 1–3 can be found in [Marker et al. 1996], while the material in Section 4 can be found in [Hrushovski and Sokolovic ≥ 2001; Pillay 1996]. The primary reference on differential algebra is [Kolchin 1973], though the very readable [Kaplansky 1957] contains most of the basics needed here, as does the more recent [Magid 1994]. The book [Buium 1994] also contains an introduction to differential algebra and its connections to diophantine geometry. We refer the reader to these sources for references to the original literature. 1. Differentially Closed Fields Throughout this article all fields will have characteristic zero. A differential field is a field K equipped with a derivation δ : K → K. The field of constants is C = {x ∈ K : δ(x) = 0}. We will study differential fields using the language L = {+,− , · , δ, 0, 1}, the language of rings augmented by a unary function symbol δ. The theory of
The paper introduces the notion of definable compactness and within the context of o-minimal structures proves several topological properties of definably compact spaces. In particular a definable set in an … The paper introduces the notion of definable compactness and within the context of o-minimal structures proves several topological properties of definably compact spaces. In particular a definable set in an o-minimal structure is definably compact (with respect to the subspace topology) if and only if it is closed and bounded. Definable compactness is then applied to the study of groups and rings in o-minimal structures. The main result proved is that any infinite definable group in an o-minimal structure that is not definably compact contains a definable torsion-free subgroup of dimension 1. With this theorem, a complete characterization is given of all rings without zero divisors that are definable in o-minimal structures. The paper concludes with several examples illustrating some limitations on extending the theorem.
A difference field is a field with a distinguished automorphism<inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="sigma"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\sigma</mml:annotation></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. This paper studies the model theory of existentially closed difference fields. We introduce a dimension theory … A difference field is a field with a distinguished automorphism<inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="sigma"><mml:semantics><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\sigma</mml:annotation></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>. This paper studies the model theory of existentially closed difference fields. We introduce a dimension theory on formulas, and in particular on difference equations. We show that an arbitrary formula may be reduced into one-dimensional ones, and analyze the possible internal structures on the one-dimensional formulas when the characteristic is<inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="0"><mml:semantics><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">0</mml:annotation></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The brilliant work of Ax-Kochen [1], [2], [3] and Ersov [6], and later work by Kochen [7] have made clear very striking resemblances between real closed fields and p -adically … The brilliant work of Ax-Kochen [1], [2], [3] and Ersov [6], and later work by Kochen [7] have made clear very striking resemblances between real closed fields and p -adically closed fields, from the model-theoretical point of view. Cohen [5], from a standpoint less model-theoretic, also contributed much to this analogy. In this paper we shall point out a feature of all the above treatments which obscures one important resemblance between real and p -adic fields. We shall outline a new treatment of the p -adic case (not far removed from the classical treatments cited above), and establish an new analogy between real closed and p -adically closed fields. We want to describe the definable subsets of p -adically closed fields. Tarski [9] in his pioneering work described the first-order definable subsets of real closed fields. Namely, if K is a real-closed field and X is a subset of K first-order definable on K using parameters from K then X is a finite union of nonoverlapping intervals (open, closed, half-open, empty or all of K ). In particular, if X is infinite, X has nonempty interior. Now, there is an analogous question for p -adically closed fields. If K is p -adically closed, what are the definable subsets of K ? To the best of our knowledge, this question has not been answered until now. What is the difference between the two cases? Tarski's analysis rests on elimination of quantifiers for real closed fields. Elimination of quantifiers for p -adically closed fields has been achieved [3], but only when we take a cross-section π as part of our basic data. The problem is that in the presence of π it becomes very difficult to figure out what sort of set is definable by a quantifier free formula. We shall see later that use of the cross-section increases the class of definable sets.
We study model-theoretic and stability-theoretic properties of the non-abelian free group in the light of Sela's recent result on stability and results announced by Bestvina and Feighn on ‘negligible subsets' … We study model-theoretic and stability-theoretic properties of the non-abelian free group in the light of Sela's recent result on stability and results announced by Bestvina and Feighn on ‘negligible subsets' of free groups. We point out analogies between the free group and so-called bad groups of finite Morley rank, and prove ‘non-CM-triviality' of the free group.
For a dependent theory <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper T"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">T</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>, in <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="German upper C Subscript upper T"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> … For a dependent theory <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper T"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">T</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>, in <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="German upper C Subscript upper T"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">C</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">{\mathfrak {C}}_{T}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> for every type definable group <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>, the intersection of type definable subgroups with bounded index is a type definable subgroup with bounded index.
On introduit la notion de theorie O-minimale des structures ordonnees, une telle theorie etant telle que les sous-ensembles definissables de ses modeles soient particulierement simples On introduit la notion de theorie O-minimale des structures ordonnees, une telle theorie etant telle que les sous-ensembles definissables de ses modeles soient particulierement simples
We make several observations about the category C of compact complex manifolds, considered as a many-sorted structure of finite Morley rank. We also point out that the Mordell-Lang conjecture holds … We make several observations about the category C of compact complex manifolds, considered as a many-sorted structure of finite Morley rank. We also point out that the Mordell-Lang conjecture holds for complex tori: if A is a complex torus, Γ a finitely generated subgroup of A, and X an analytic subvariety of A, then X ∩ Γ is a finite union of translates of subgroups of A. This is implicit in the literature but we give an elementary reduction to the abelian variety case. We discuss analogies between C and the category of finite dimensional differential algebraic sets. (A brief survey of the Mordell-Lang conjecture and model-theoretic contributions is also included.)