Mingming Zhang

Follow

Generating author description...

All published works

Action	Title	Year	Authors
+ PDF Chat	Assessment of the Quality of Reporting in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Five Leading Chinese Medical Journals	2010	Yaolong Chen Jing Li Changlin Ai Yurong Duan Ling Wang Mingming Zhang Sally Hopewell
+ PDF Chat	Quality of reporting of trial abstracts needs to be improved: using the CONSORT for abstracts to assess the four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine	2010	Ling Wang Yulin Li Jing Li Mingming Zhang Lin Xu Wenming Yuan Gang Wang Sally Hopewell
+	Chinese authors do need CONSORT: Reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals	2008	Lin Xu Jing Li Mingming Zhang Changlin Ai Ling Wang

Common Coauthors

Coauthor	Papers Together
Changlin Ai	2
Ling Wang	2
Sally Hopewell	2
Gang Wang	1
Ling Wang	1
Yulin Li	1
Jing Li	1
Jing Li	1
Lin Xu	1
Lin Xu	1
Yurong Duan	1
Wenming Yuan	1
Yaolong Chen	1
Jing Li	1

Commonly Cited References

Action	Title	Year	Authors	# of times referenced
+	Chinese authors do need CONSORT: Reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals	2008	Lin Xu Jing Li Mingming Zhang Changlin Ai Ling Wang	2
+	Quality Assessment of Pharmacoeconomic Abstracts of Original Research Articles in Selected Journals	1997	K Trakas Antonio Addis Dorothy Kruk Y. Buczek Michaël Iskedjian Thomas R. Einarson	2
+ PDF Chat	CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration	2008	Sally Hopewell Mike Clarke David Moher Elizabeth Wager Philippa Middleton Douglas G. Altman Kenneth F. Schulz	2
+	The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals	2008	Otávio Berwanger Rodrigo Antonini Ribeiro Alessandro Finkelsztejn Marcelo Watanabe Érica Aranha Suzumura Bruce Bartholow Duncan P.J. Devereaux Deborah J. Cook	2
+	Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials?	1984	Salim Yusuf Rory Collins Richard Peto	1
+	Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials	1995	Klaus‐Peter Schulz	1
+	The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist	2002	P.J. Devereaux Braden Manns William A. Ghali Hude Quan Gordon Guyatt	1
+	Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists	1995	David Moher Alejandro R. Jadad Graham Nichol Marie Penman Peter Tugwell Sharon Walsh	1
+	The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials	2001	David Moher Kenneth F. Schulz Douglas G. Altman	1
+	Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement	2006	Robert L Kane Jye Wang Judith Garrard	1
+	CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to Help Improve the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials	1998	David Moher	1
+	The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Survey of 13 Randomly Selected Journals from Mainland China	2007	Gang Wang Bing Mao Zeyu Xiong Tao Fan Xiaohong Chen Lei Wang Guanjian Liu Jia Liu Jia Guo Jing Chang	1
+	Empirical Evidence of Bias	1995	Kenneth F. Schulz	1
+ PDF Chat	Statistics notes: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence	1995	David Altman John M. Bland	1
+ PDF Chat	Randomisation.	1991	Douglas G. Altman	1
+	Statistical Power, Sample Size, and Their Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials	1994	David Moher	1
+	Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals	1994	Kenneth F. Schulz	1
+ PDF Chat	The randomized clinical trial: bias in analysis.	1981	Graham S. May David L. DeMets Lilach M. Friedman Curt D. Furberg Eugene R. Passamani	1