Pardeep S. Jhund

Follow

Generating author description...

All published works
Action Title Year Authors
+ Natural Language Processing to Adjudicate Heart Failure Hospitalizations in Global Clinical Trials 2024 Pablo-Miki MartĂ­ Castellote
Christopher Reeder
Brian Claggett
Pulkit Singh
Emily S. Lau
Shaan Khurshid
Puneet Batra
Steven A. Lubitz
Mahnaz Maddah
Orly Vardeny
+ Evaluating Tools for Assessing Bias in a Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials on Race and RAS Blockade—Reply 2024 Li Shen
Pardeep S. Jhund
John J.V. McMurray
+ PDF Chat A hierarchical kidney outcome using win statistics in patients with heart failure from the DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials 2024 Toru Kondo
Pardeep S. Jhund
Samvel B. Gasparyan
Mingming Yang
Brian Claggett
Finnian R. McCausland
Paolo Tolomeo
Muthiah Vadagunathan
Hiddo J.L. Heerspink
Scott D. Solomon
+ Operational challenges and mitigation measures during the COVID-19 pandemic–Lessons from DELIVER 2023 Ankeet S. Bhatt
Daniel Lindholm
A.A. Nilsson
Natalia Zaozerska
Brian Claggett
Muthiah Vaduganathan
Mikhail Kosiborod
Carolyn S.P. Lam
Adrian F. Hernandez
Felipe A. MartĂ­nez
+ PDF Chat Within trial comparison of survival time projections from short‐term follow‐up with long‐term follow‐up findings 2022 João Pedro Ferreira
Brian Claggett
Kieran F. Docherty
Pardeep S. Jhund
Faı̈ez Zannad
Scott D. Solomon
John J.V. McMurray
+ PDF Chat Quantifying Treatment Effects in Trials with Multiple Event-Time Outcomes 2022 Brian Claggett
Zachary R. McCaw
LĂŒ Tian
John J.V. McMurray
Pardeep S. Jhund
Hajime Uno
Marc A. Pfeffer
Scott D. Solomon
L. J. Wei
+ Estimating the Lifetime Benefits of Treatments for Heart Failure 2020 JoĂŁo Pedro Ferreira
Kieran F. Docherty
Susan Stienen
Pardeep S. Jhund
Brian Claggett
Scott D. Solomon
Mark C. Petrie
John Gregson
Stuart J. Pocock
Faı̈ez Zannad
+ Use of the Win Ratio in Cardiovascular Trials 2020 JoĂŁo Pedro Ferreira
Pardeep S. Jhund
KĂ©vin Duarte
Brian Claggett
Scott D. Solomon
Stuart J. Pocock
Mark C Petrie
Faı̈ez Zannad
John J.V. McMurray
+ PDF Chat Association is not causation: treatment effects cannot be estimated from observational data in heart failure 2018 Christopher Rush
Ross T. Campbell
Pardeep S. Jhund
Mark C. Petrie
John J.V. McMurray
+ Re-Examination of the BEST Trial Using Composite Outcomes, Including Emergency Department Visits 2017 Li Shen
Pardeep S. Jhund
Ulrik M. Mogensen
Lars KĂžber
Brian Claggett
Jennifer K. Rogers
John J.V. McMurray
+ PDF Chat How robust are clinical trials in heart failure? 2016 Kieran F. Docherty
Ross T. Campbell
Pardeep S. Jhund
Mark C. Petrie
John J.V. McMurray
+ PDF Chat Reporting of Lost to Follow-Up and Treatment Discontinuation in Pharmacotherapy and Device Trials in Chronic Heart Failure 2016 Ross T. Campbell
G. Willox
Pardeep S. Jhund
Nathaniel M. Hawkins
Flora Huang
Mark C. Petrie
John J.V. McMurray
+ Effect of Rosuvastatin on Repeat Heart Failure Hospitalizations 2014 Jennifer K. Rogers
Pardeep S. Jhund
Ana Cristina Perez Moreno
Michael Böhm
John G.F. Cleland
Lars Gullestad
John Kjekshus
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen
John Wikstrand
Hans Wedel
Common Coauthors
Commonly Cited References
Action Title Year Authors # of times referenced
+ PDF Chat Analysing recurrent hospitalizations in heart failure: a review of statistical methodology, with application to <scp>CHARM</scp>‐Preserved 2013 Jennifer K. Rogers
Stuart J. Pocock
John J.V. McMurray
Christopher B. Granger
Eric L. Michelson
Jan Östergren
Marc A. Pfeffer
Scott D. Solomon
Karl Swedberg
Salim Yusuf
3
+ PDF Chat The win ratio: a new approach to the analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials based on clinical priorities 2011 SJ Pocock
Cono Ariti
Timothy Collier
Dee Dee Wang
3
+ Nonparametric Analysis of Recurrent Events and Death 2000 Debashis Ghosh
D. Y. Lin
2
+ PDF Chat Moving Beyond the Hazard Ratio in Quantifying the Between-Group Difference in Survival Analysis 2014 Hajime Uno
Brian Claggett
LĂŒ Tian
Eisuke Inoue
Paul Gallo
Toshio Miyata
Deborah Schrag
Masahiro Takeuchi
Yoshiaki Uyama
Lihui Zhao
2
+ PDF Chat The ASA Statement on <i>p</i>-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose 2016 Ronald L. Wasserstein
Nicole A. Lazar
2
+ Cox's Regression Model for Counting Processes: A Large Sample Study 1982 P. Andersen
Richard D. Gill
1
+ PDF Chat Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational research 2013 Nick Freemantle
Louise Marston
Kate Walters
John Wood
Matthew R. Reynolds
Irene Petersen
1
+ PDF Chat Semiparametric Regression for the Mean and Rate Functions of Recurrent Events 2000 D. Y. Lin
L. J. Wei
Ilsoon Yang
Z. Ying
1
+ The Robust Inference for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model 1989 D. Y. Lin
L. J. Wei
1
+ Combining mortality and longitudinal measures in clinical trials 1999 Dianne M. Finkelstein
David Schoenfeld
1
+ PDF Chat Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials 2007 Ignacio Ferreira‐González
Gaiet Permanyer-Miralda
AntĂČnia Domingo‐Salvany
Jason W. Busse
Diane Heels‐Ansdell
VĂ­ctor M. Montori
Elie A. Akl
Dianne Bryant
Pablo Alonso‐Coello
Jordi Alonso
1
+ Misspecified proportional hazard models 1986 C. A. Struthers
John D. Kalbfleisch
1
+ PDF Chat Restricted mean survival time: an alternative to the hazard ratio for the design and analysis of randomized trials with a time-to-event outcome 2013 Patrick Royston
Mahesh Parmar
1
+ PDF Chat The Number of Patients and Events Required to Limit the Risk of Overestimation of Intervention Effects in Meta-Analysis—A Simulation Study 2011 Kristian Thorlund
Georgina Imberger
Michael Walsh
Rong Chu
Christian Gluud
JĂžrn Wetterslev
Gordon Guyatt
P.J. Devereaux
Lehana Thabane
1
+ Statistical significance and fragility criteria for assessing a difference of two proportions 1991 Stephen D. Walter
1
+ Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity 2013 Soo Young Kim
Ji Eun Park
Yoon Jae Lee
Hyun‐Ju Seo
Seung Soo Sheen
Seokyung Hahn
Bo‐Hyoung Jang
Hee Jung Son
1
+ Bias and causal associations in observational research 2002 David A. Grimes
Kenneth F. Schulz
1
+ Sample size slippages in randomised trials: exclusions and the lost and wayward 2002 Kenneth F. Schulz
David A. Grimes
1
+ Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression, with an Application to Defects in Manufacturing 1992 Diane Lambert
1
+ PDF Chat Reporting of loss to follow-up information in randomised controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: a literature survey 2011 Elke Vervölgyi
Mandy Kromp
Guido Skipka
Ralf Bender
Thomas Kaiser
1
+ Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group 1998 Ralph B. D’Agostino
1
+ PDF Chat Invited Commentary: Assessing Treatment Effects by Using Observational Analyses--Opportunities and Limitations 2009 P. S. Wang
M. Schoenbaum
1
+ Opportunities and challenges of combined effect measures based on prioritized outcomes 2013 Geraldine Rauch
Antje Jahn‐Eimermacher
Werner Brannath
Meinhard Kieser
1
+ PDF Chat The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials 2001 David Moher
Kenneth F. Schulz
Douglas G. Altman
1
+ The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials 2001 David Moher
1
+ PDF Chat Key Issues in End Point Selection for Heart Failure Trials: Composite End Points 2005 James D. Neaton
Gerry Gray
Bram D. Zuckerman
Marvin A. Konstam
1
+ Quality adjusted survival analysis 1990 Paul Glasziou
R. John Simes
Richard D. Gelber
1
+ Estimating Treatment Effects Using Observational Data 2007 Ralph B. D’Agostino
1
+ The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index 2014 Michael Walsh
Sadeesh Srinathan
Daniel F. McAuley
Marko Mrkobrada
Oren Levine
Christine Ribic
Amber O. Molnar
Neil D. Dattani
Andrew Burke
Gordon Guyatt
1
+ Empirical estimation of life expectancy from large clinical trials: Use of left‐truncated, right‐censored survival analysis methodology 2008 Charlotte Nelson
Jie Sun
Anastasios A. Tsiatis
Daniel B. Mark
1
+ Making Sense of Statistics in Clinical Trial Reports 2015 Stuart J. Pocock
John J.V. McMurray
Timothy Collier
1
+ Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks 2016 Peter C. Austin
Douglas S. Lee
Jason P. Fine
1
+ From Methods to Policy: Observational studies versus randomized trials: squaring off 2012 Sheldon Greenfield
Sherrie H. Kaplan
1
+ PDF Chat Traditional and new composite endpoints in heart failure clinical trials: facilitating comprehensive efficacy assessments and improving trial efficiency 2016 Stefan D. Anker
Stefan Schroeder
Dan Atar
Jeroen J. Bax
Claudio Ceconi
MartĂ­n Cowie
Adam Crisp
Fabienne Dominjon
Ian Ford
Hossein A. Ghofrani
1
+ An extension of generalized pairwise comparisons for prioritized outcomes in the presence of censoring 2016 Julien PĂ©ron
Marc Buyse
Brice Ozenne
Laurent Roche
Pascal Roy
1
+ On the win-ratio statistic in clinical trials with multiple types of event 2016 David Oakes
1
+ A generalized analytic solution to the win ratio to analyze a composite endpoint considering the clinical importance order among components 2016 Gaohong Dong
Di Li
Steffen Ballerstedt
Marc Vandemeulebroecke
1
+ PDF Chat Quantifying the totality of treatment effect with multiple event‐time observations in the presence of a terminal event from a comparative clinical study 2018 Brian Claggett
LĂŒ Tian
Haoda Fu
Scott D. Solomon
L. J. Wei
1
+ PDF Chat Adjusting for unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized longitudinal studies: a methodological review 2017 Adam Streeter
Nan Lin
Louise Crathorne
Marcela Haasova
Christopher Hyde
David Melzer
William Henley
1
+ Randomized Clinical Trials 1976 David P. Byar
Richard Simon
William T. Friedewald
James J. Schlesselman
David L. DeMets
Jonas H. Ellenberg
Mitchell H. Gail
James H. Ware
1
+ Comparison of Time-to-First Event and Recurrent-Event Methods in Randomized Clinical Trials 2018 Brian Claggett
Stuart J. Pocock
L. J. Wei
Marc A. Pfeffer
John J.V. McMurray
Scott D. Solomon
1
+ Graphing the Win Ratio and its components over time 2018 Dianne M. Finkelstein
David Schoenfeld
1
+ Limitations of hazard ratios in clinical trials 2018 Mats Julius Stensrud
John M. Aalen
Odd O. Aalen
Morten Valberg
1
+ The Win Ratio: On Interpretation and Handling of Ties 2019 Gaohong Dong
David C. Hoaglin
Junshan Qiu
Roland Matsouaka
Yu‐Wei Chang
Jiuzhou Wang
Marc Vandemeulebroecke
1
+ Statistical Appraisal of 6 Recent Clinical Trials in Cardiology 2019 Stuart J. Pocock
Timothy Collier
1
+ PDF Chat Mixed‐effects models for slope‐based endpoints in clinical trials of chronic kidney disease 2019 Edward F. Vonesh
Hocine Tighiouart
Jian Ying
Hiddo J.L. Heerspink
Julia B. Lewis
Natalie Staplin
Lesley A. Inker
Tom Greene
1
+ PDF Chat Using the Restricted Mean Survival Time Difference as an Alternative to the Hazard Ratio for Analyzing Clinical Cardiovascular Studies 2019 Zachary R. McCaw
Guosheng Yin
Lee‐Jen Wei
1
+ On the empirical choice of the time window for restricted mean survival time 2020 LĂŒ Tian
Hua Jin
Hajime Uno
Ying LĂŒ
Bo Huang
Keaven M. Anderson
L. J. Wei
1
+ PDF Chat Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses 2020 Stefan Schandelmaier
Matthias Briel
Ravi Varadhan
Christopher H. Schmid
Niveditha Devasenapathy
Rodney A. Hayward
Joel Gagnier
Michael Borenstein
Geert J. M. G. van der Heijden
Issa J Dahabreh
1
+ The win ratio approach for composite endpoints: practical guidance based on previous experience 2020 Björn Redfors
John Gregson
Aaron Crowley
Thomas McAndrew
Ori Ben‐Yehuda
Gregg W. Stone
Stuart J. Pocock
1