Freddie C. Hamdy

Follow

Generating author description...

All published works
Action Title Year Authors
+ Specificity of a polygenic score for aggressive prostate cancer 2025 Anna Dornisch
George Xu
Roshan Karunamuni
Charles A. Brunette
Morgan Danowski
Craig C. Teerlink
J. Michael Gaziano
Isla P. Garraway
Richard Hauger
Adam S. Kibel
+ From a genomic risk model to clinical trial implementation in a learning health system: the ProGRESS Study 2024 Jason L. Vassy
Anna Dornisch
Roshan Karunamuni
Michael Gatzen
Christopher Kachulis
Niall J. Lennon
Charles A. Brunette
Morgan E. Danowski
Richard L. Hauger
Isla P. Garraway
+ PDF Chat Endemic statistical paradoxes in epidemiologic studies distort knowledge on prostate cancer: mitigation and caution of fallacies in prostate cancer causal epidemiological studies 2023 Olivier Cussenot
Gaëlle Fromont
Géraldine Cancel‐Tassin
Freddie C. Hamdy
Richard M. Martin
+ Beyond attention: deriving biologically interpretable insights from weakly-supervised multiple-instance learning models 2023 Willem Bonnaffé
CRUK ICGC Prostate Group
Freddie C. Hamdy
Yang Hu
Ian G. Mills
Jens Rittscher
Clare Verrill
Dan J. Woodcock
+ PDF Chat Additional SNPs improve the performance of a polygenic hazard score for prostate cancer 2020 Roshan Karunamuni
Minh‐Phuong Huynh‐Le
Chun Chieh Fan
Wesley K. Thompson
Rosalind A. Eeles
Zsofia Kote‐Jarai
Kenneth Muir
Artitaya Lophatananon
Johanna Schleutker
Nora Pashayan
+ PDF Chat Polygenic Hazard Score for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification: Validation in Additional Longitudinal Cohorts 2019 K.E. Tye
Minh‐Phuong Huynh‐Le
Chun Fan
Sonja I. Berndt
Freddie C. Hamdy
Ian G. Mills
Ole A. Andreassen
Anders M. Dale
Tyler M. Seibert
+ PDF Chat Factors associated with trial recruitment, preferences, and treatments received were elucidated in a comprehensive cohort study 2019 Jenny Donovan
Brent C. Opmeer
Grace Young
Nicola Mills
Richard M. Martin
J. Athene Lane
Chris Metcalfe
T. J. Peters
Michael Davis
Emma L. Turner
+ PDF Chat A genetic hazard score to personalize prostate cancer screening, applied to population data 2019 Minh‐Phuong Huynh‐Le
Chun Fan
Roshan Karunamuni
Eleanor Walsh
Emma L. Turner
J. Athene Lane
Richard M. Martin
David E. Neal
Jenny Donovan
Freddie C. Hamdy
+ PDF Chat Partial ablation versus radical prostatectomy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: the PART feasibility RCT 2018 Freddie C. Hamdy
Daisy Elliott
Steffi le Conte
Lucy Davies
Richéal Burns
Claire Thomson
Richard Gray
Jane Wolstenholme
Jenny Donovan
Ray Fitzpatrick
+ PDF Chat Value of Intact Prostate Specific Antigen and Human Kallikrein 2 in the 4 Kallikrein Predictive Model: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis 2018 Andrew J. Vickers
Emily Vertosick
Daniel D. Sjoberg
Freddie C. Hamdy
David E. Neal
Anders Bjartell
Jonas Hugosson
Jenny Donovan
Arnauld Villers
Stephen Zappala
+ PDF Chat A prospective cohort and extended comprehensive-cohort design provided insights about the generalizability of a pragmatic trial: the ProtecT prostate cancer trial 2017 Jenny Donovan
Grace Young
Eleanor Walsh
Chris Metcalfe
J. Athene Lane
Richard M. Martin
Marta Tazewell
Michael Davis
T. J. Peters
Emma L. Turner
+ Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer 2017 Freddie C. Hamdy
Jenny Donovan
+ PDF Chat 10-Year Outcomes in Localized Prostate Cancer 2017 Freddie C. Hamdy
Jenny Donovan
David E. Neal
+ Statistical Analysis Plan: Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) Study 2015 Chris Metcalfe
T. J. Peters
Freddie C. Hamdy
+ Description of statistical methods used to model repeated measures of prostate-specific antigen 2015 Andrew J. Simpkin
Leila Rooshenas
Julia Wade
Jenny Donovan
J. Athene Lane
Richard M. Martin
Chris Metcalfe
Peter C. Albertsen
Freddie C. Hamdy
Lars Holmberg
+ Standardisation of information submitted to an endpoint committee for cause of death assignment in a cancer screening trial - Lessons learnt from CAP (Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer) Data collection, quality, and reporting 2015 N J Williams
Edward M. Hill
Siaw Yein Ng
Richard M. Martin
Chris Metcalfe
J L Donovan
Simon Evans
Laura Hughes
Charlotte Davies
Freddie C. Hamdy
+ PDF Chat Implications of polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer on overdiagnosis 2015 Nora Pashayan
Stephen W. Duffy
David E. Neal
Freddie C. Hamdy
Jenny Donovan
Richard M. Martin
Patricia Harrington
Sara Benlloch
Ali Amin Al Olama
Mitul Shah
+ Implications of polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer on overdiagnosis 2014 Nora Pashayan
S W Duffy
David E. Neal
Freddie C. Hamdy
J Donovan
Richard M. Martin
Patricia Harrington
Sara Benlloch
Ali Amin Al Olama
Mitul Shah
+ PDF Chat Misclassification of outcome in case–control studies: Methods for sensitivity analysis 2014 Rebecca Gilbert
Richard M. Martin
Jenny Donovan
J. Athene Lane
Freddie C. Hamdy
David E. Neal
Chris Metcalfe
+ PDF Chat Evaluation of source data verification in a multicentre cancer trial (PROTECT) 2013 J. Athene Lane
Michael Davis
Liz Down
Rhiannon Macefield
David E. Neal
Freddie C. Hamdy
Jenny Donovan
Hilary Taylor
+ Longitudinal prostate-specific antigen reference ranges: Choosing the underlying model of age-related changes 2013 Andrew J. Simpkin
Chris Metcalfe
Richard M. Martin
J. Athene Lane
Jenny Donovan
Freddie C. Hamdy
David E. Neal
Kate Tilling
+ PDF Chat Evaluating the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial High Grade prostate cancer risk calculator in 10 international biopsy cohorts: results from the prostate biopsy collaborative group 2012 Donna P. Ankerst
Andreas Boeck
Stephen J. Freedland
J. Stephen Jones
Angel M. Cronin
Monique J. Roobol
Jonas Hugosson
Michael W. Kattan
Eric A. Klein
Freddie C. Hamdy
+ PDF Chat Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group 2011 Donna P. Ankerst
Andreas Boeck
Stephen J. Freedland
Ian M. Thompson
Angel M. Cronin
Monique J. Roobol
Jonas Hugosson
J. Stephen Jones
Michael W. Kattan
Eric A. Klein
+ PDF Chat Understanding factors influencing questionnaire response rates to maximise retention in a long term complex intervention trial 2011 J. Athene Lane
Liz Down
Julia Wade
David E. Neal
Freddie C. Hamdy
Jenny Donovan
+ A Peer Review Intervention for Monitoring and Evaluating sites (PRIME) that improved randomized controlled trial conduct and performance 2011 J. Athene Lane
Julia Wade
Liz Down
Susan Bonnington
Peter Holding
Teresa Lennon
Amanda Jones
C. Elizabeth Salter
David E. Neal
Freddie C. Hamdy
+ PDF Chat 043 Adjusting misclassification of outcome in case-control studies 2010 Rebecca Gilbert
Richard M. Martin
J. Athene Lane
David E. Neal
Freddie C. Hamdy
J L Donovan
Chris Metcalfe
+ PDF Chat The Relationship between Prostate-Specific Antigen and Prostate Cancer Risk: The Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group 2010 Andrew J. Vickers
Angel M. Cronin
Monique J. Roobol
Jonas Hugosson
J. Stephen Jones
Michael W. Kattan
Eric A. Klein
Freddie C. Hamdy
David E. Neal
Jenny Donovan
+ PDF Chat Current strategies for monitoring men with localised prostate cancer lack a strong evidence base: observational longitudinal study 2009 Chris Metcalfe
Kate Tilling
Mark Davis
J. Athene Lane
Richard M. Martin
Howard Kynaston
Philip Powell
David E. Neal
Freddie C. Hamdy
J L Donovan
+ Prostate cancer: a systems approach overview 2008 Simon S. Cross
Freddie C. Hamdy
J R Goepel
Robert F. Harrison
+ Application of Artificial Intelligence to the Management of Urological Cancer 2007 Maysam Abbod
James W.F. Catto
D.A. Linkens
Freddie C. Hamdy
+ PDF Chat Continuing Controversy Over Monitoring Men With Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Programs in the Prostate Specific Antigen Era 2006 Richard M. Martin
David Gunnell
Freddie C. Hamdy
David E. Neal
J. Athene Lane
Jenny Donovan
+ A comparison of socio-demographic and psychological factors between patients consenting to randomisation and those selecting treatment (the ProtecT study) 2006 Nicola Mills
Chris Metcalfe
Carine Ronsmans
Michael Davis
J. Athene Lane
Jonathan A C Sterne
T. J. Peters
Freddie C. Hamdy
David E. Neal
Jenny Donovan
+ PDF Chat Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) feasibility study 2003 Jenny Donovan
Freddie C. Hamdy
David E. Neal
T. J. Peters
Samuel J. Oliver
Lucy Brindle
David Jewell
Philip Powell
David Gillatt
Daniel Dedman
+ Statistical and soft feature evaluation indices for prostate cancer prognostic factor assessments 2001 Hüseyin Şeker
Michael Odetayo
Dobrila Petrov́ić
R.N.G. Naguib
Freddie C. Hamdy
+ Comparison between artificial neural networks and urologists' assessment of outcome in bladder cancer - Part I: Progression and recurrence in Ta/T1 tumours 1999 R.N.G. Naguib
K N Qureshi
Freddie C. Hamdy
David E. Neal
J. Kilian Mellon
+ A general regression neural network analysis of prognostic markers in prostate cancer 1998 R.N.G. Naguib
Freddie C. Hamdy
Common Coauthors
Commonly Cited References
Action Title Year Authors # of times referenced
+ PDF Chat Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) feasibility study 2003 Jenny Donovan
Freddie C. Hamdy
David E. Neal
T. J. Peters
Samuel J. Oliver
Lucy Brindle
David Jewell
Philip Powell
David Gillatt
Daniel Dedman
4
+ PDF Chat The Relationship between Prostate-Specific Antigen and Prostate Cancer Risk: The Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group 2010 Andrew J. Vickers
Angel M. Cronin
Monique J. Roobol
Jonas Hugosson
J. Stephen Jones
Michael W. Kattan
Eric A. Klein
Freddie C. Hamdy
David E. Neal
Jenny Donovan
2
+ PDF Chat Reducing Unnecessary Biopsy During Prostate Cancer Screening Using a Four-Kallikrein Panel: An Independent Replication 2010 Andrew J. Vickers
Angel M. Cronin
Monique J. Roobol
Caroline Savage
Mari Peltola
Kim Pettersson
Peter T. Scardino
Fritz H. Schröder
Hans Lilja
2
+ Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification 2007 Stef van Buuren
2
+ Computing the Cox model for case cohort designs. 1999 Terry M. Therneau
Hongzhe Li
2
+ Performance of Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator in a Contemporary Cohort Screened for Prostate Cancer and Diagnosed by Extended Prostate Biopsy 2009 Carvell T. Nguyen
Changhong Yu
Ayman Moussa
Michael W. Kattan
J. Stephen Jones
2
+ THE LASSO METHOD FOR VARIABLE SELECTION IN THE COX MODEL 1997 Robert Tibshirani
2
+ PDF Chat Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction Models 2006 Andrew J. Vickers
Elena B. Elkin
2
+ PDF Chat A literature review on the representativeness of randomized controlled trial samples and implications for the external validity of trial results 2015 Tessa Kennedy‐Martin
Sarah L. Hulin-Curtis
Douglas E. Faries
Susan Robinson
Joseph A. Johnston
2
+ Variations in PSA doubling time in patients with prostate cancer on “watchful waiting”: Value of short-term PSADT determinations 2004 Phillip Ross
Salaheddin M. Mahmud
Andrew J. Stephenson
Luís Souhami
Simon Tanguay
Armen Aprikian
2
+ Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso 1996 Robert Tibshirani
2
+ Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach 1988 Elizabeth R. DeLong
David M. DeLong
Daniel L. Clarke‐Pearson
2
+ 1873: External Validation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator in a Screened Population 2007 Dipen J. Parekh
Amanda Beth Reed
Donna P. Ankerst
Betsy Higgins
Javier Hernández
Edith Canby‐Hagino
Timothy C. Brand
Dean A. Troyer
Robin J. Leach
Ian M. Thompson
2
+ Evaluation of artificial neural networks for the prediction of pathologic stage in prostate carcinoma 2001 Misop Han
Peter B. Snow
Jeffrey M. Brandt
Alan W. Partin
1
+ Comparison of artificial neural networks with other statistical approaches 2001 Daniel J. Sargent
1
+ PDF Chat Statistical Learning from a Regression Perspective 2016 Richard A. Berk
1
+ Testing the evolution process of prostate‐specific antigen in early stage prostate cancer: what is the proper underlying model? 2011 Eliezer Z. Prisman
Amiram Gafni
Antonio Finelli
1
+ PDF Chat Applied logistic regression 1990 David W. Hosmer
Stanley Lemeshow
1
+ Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model 2000 Terry M. Therneau
Patricia M. Grambsch
1
+ PDF Chat The role of volume‐weighted mean nuclear volume in predicting tumour biology and clinical behaviour in patients with prostate cancer undergoing watchful waiting 2001 Yoichi Arai
Shin Egawa
Sadahito Kuwao
K. Ogura
Shiro Baba
1
+ PDF Chat Sensitivity analysis for misclassification in logistic regression via likelihood methods and predictive value weighting 2010 Robert H. Lyles
Ji Lin
1
+ PDF Chat Testing for familial aggregation of functional traits 2009 Yixin Fang
Yuanjia Wang
1
+ Novel Artificial Neural Network for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer 2002 Bob Djavan
Mesut Remzi
Alexandre R. Zlotta
Christian Seitz
Peter B. Snow
Michael Marberger
1
+ PDF Chat Management and Conduct of Randomized Controlled Trials 2002 Genell L. Knatterud
1
+ Predictors of Treatment After Initial Surveillance in Men With Prostate Cancer: Results From CaPSURE 2003 Maxwell V. Meng
Eric P. Elkin
Susan R. Harlan
S. Mehta
Deborah P. Lubeck
Peter R. Carroll
1
+ Active Surveillance with Selective Delayed Intervention: A Biologically Nuanced Approach to Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer 2003 Laurence Klotz
1
+ Watchful Waiting or Watchful Progression? Prostate Specific Antigen Doubling Times and Clinical Behavior in Patients With Early Untreated Prostate Carcinoma 1998 Duncan B. McLaren
Michael McKenzie
Gillian Duncan
Tom Pickles
1
+ A neural network predicts progression for men with Gleason score 3+4 versus 4+3 tumors after radical prostatectomy 2000 Misop Han
Peter B. Snow
Jonathan I. Epstein
Theresa Y. Chan
Kerrie A. Jones
Patrick C. Walsh
Alan W Partin
1
+ PDF Chat Logistic Regression When the Outcome Is Measured with Uncertainty 1997 Laurence S. Magder
James P. Hughes
1
+ Can Prostate Specific Antigen Derivatives and Pathological Parameters Predict Significant Change in Expectant Management Criteria for Prostate Cancer? 2003 Masood A. Khan
H. Ballentine Carter
Jonathan I. Epstein
Michael Craig Miller
Patricia Landis
Patrick Walsh
Alan W. Partin
Robert W. Veltri
1
+ PDF Chat Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group 2011 Donna P. Ankerst
Andreas Boeck
Stephen J. Freedland
Ian M. Thompson
Angel M. Cronin
Monique J. Roobol
Jonas Hugosson
J. Stephen Jones
Michael W. Kattan
Eric A. Klein
1
+ Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics in Clinical Decision-Making During Active Surveillance for Early Prostate Cancer—A Review 2008 Roderick C.N. van den Bergh
Stijn Roemeling
Monique J. Roobol
Tineke Wolters
Fritz H. Schröder
Chris H. Bangma
1
+ Watchful Waiting and Factors Predictive of Secondary Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer 2004 Hongyan Wu
Leon Sun
Judd W. Moul
HONGYU WU
David G. McLeod
Christopher L. Amling
Raymond Lance
Leo Kusuda
Timothy F. Donahue
John Foley
1
+ A Peer Review Intervention for Monitoring and Evaluating sites (PRIME) that improved randomized controlled trial conduct and performance 2011 J. Athene Lane
Julia Wade
Liz Down
Susan Bonnington
Peter Holding
Teresa Lennon
Amanda Jones
C. Elizabeth Salter
David E. Neal
Freddie C. Hamdy
1
+ PDF Chat Misclassification of outcome in case–control studies: Methods for sensitivity analysis 2014 Rebecca Gilbert
Richard M. Martin
Jenny Donovan
J. Athene Lane
Freddie C. Hamdy
David E. Neal
Chris Metcalfe
1
+ Artificial neural network model for the assessment of lymph node spread in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer 2001 Joseph T. Batuello
Eduard J. Gamito
E. David Crawford
Misop Han
Alan W. Partin
David G. McLeod
Colin O’Donnell
1
+ PDF Chat Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data 1997 Geert Verbeke
1
+ PDF Chat Using fractional polynomials to model non‐linear trends in longitudinal data 2009 Jeffrey D. Long
Ji Hoon Ryoo
1
+ Research staff turnover and participant adherence in the Women's Health Initiative 2003 Marie Jackson
Nancy Berman
Margaret Huber
Linda Snetselaar
Iris Granek
Kathryn Boe
Carole Milas
Jill Spivak
Rowan T. Chlebowski
1
+ The Comparability of Models for Predicting the Risk of a Positive Prostate Biopsy with Prostate-Specific Antigen Alone: A Systematic Review 2008 Fritz H. Schröder
Michael W. Kattan
1
+ Application of influence diagrams to prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy plan selection 2004 Juergen Meyer
Mark H. Phillips
Paul S. Cho
Ira J. Kalet
Jason N. Doctor
1
+ PDF Chat Results of Conservative Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer 1994 Gerald W. Chodak
Ronald A. Thisted
Glenn S. Gerber
Jan‐Erik Johansson
Jan Adolfsson
G. W. Jones
G. D. Chisholm
Boaz Moskovitz
Pinhas M. Livne
John Warner
1
+ PDF Chat Analyzing growth trajectories 2011 Ian W. McKeague
Sara López‐Pintado
Marc Hallin
Miroslav Šiman
1
+ Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer. 2012 Craig Ramsay
Robert Pickard
Clare Robertson
Andrew Close
Luke Vale
Nigel Armstrong
Daniel A. Barocas
CG Eden
Cynthia Fraser
Tara Gurung
1
+ Developing systems for cost-effective auditing of clinical trials 1997 Robert M. Califf
Sharon L. Karnash
Lynn H. Woodlief
1
+ Expectant management as an option for men with stage T1c prostate cancer: a preliminary study 1997 James L. Mohler
Bernadette T. Williams
John A. Freeman
James L. Mohler
1
+ Sensitivity Analysis of Misclassification: A Graphical and a Bayesian Approach 2006 Haitao Chu
Zhaojie Wang
Stephen R. Cole
Sander Greenland
1
+ Modeling Prostate Specific Antigen Kinetics in Patients on Active Surveillance 2006 Liying Zhang
Andrew Loblaw
Laurence Klotz
1
+ PDF Chat Implications of polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer on overdiagnosis 2015 Nora Pashayan
Stephen W. Duffy
David E. Neal
Freddie C. Hamdy
Jenny Donovan
Richard M. Martin
Patricia Harrington
Sara Benlloch
Ali Amin Al Olama
Mitul Shah
1
+ Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots 1979 William S. Cleveland
1