Author Description

Sergei Starchenko is a mathematician and professor at the University of Notre Dame. He is known for his work in model theory, particularly in the areas of o-minimal structures and real analytic geometry. He has co-authored influential papers on expansions of real closed fields and the model-theoretic properties of definable sets. His research often involves the interplay between logic and geometry, studying how logical frameworks can give insights into geometric structures.

Ask a Question About This Mathematician

Let M = 〈M, <, …〉 be alinearly ordered structure. We define M to be o-minimal if every definable subset of M is a finite union of intervals. Classical examples … Let M = 〈M, <, …〉 be alinearly ordered structure. We define M to be o-minimal if every definable subset of M is a finite union of intervals. Classical examples are ordered divisible abelian groups and real closed fields. We prove a trichotomy theorem for the structure that an arbitraryo-minimal M can induce on a neighbourhood of any a in M. Roughly said, one of the following holds: (i) a is trivial (technical term), or (ii) a has a convex neighbourhood on which M induces the structure of an ordered vector space, or (iii) a is contained in an open interval on which M induces the structure of an expansion of a real closed field. The proof uses 'geometric calculus' which allows one to recover a differentiable structure by purely geometric methods. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification: primary 03C45; secondary 03C52, 12J15, 14P10.
Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G equals mathematical left-angle upper G comma dot mathematical right-angle"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> … Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G equals mathematical left-angle upper G comma dot mathematical right-angle"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}=\langle G, \cdot \rangle</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be a group definable in an o-minimal structure <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {M}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. A subset <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper H"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">H</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable if <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper H"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">H</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is definable in the structure <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="mathematical left-angle upper G comma dot mathematical right-angle"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\langle G,\cdot \rangle</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> (while <italic>definable</italic> means definable in the structure <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {M}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>). Assume <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> has no <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable proper subgroup of finite index. In this paper we prove that if <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> has no nontrivial abelian normal subgroup, then <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is the direct product of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable subgroups <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper H 1 comma ellipsis comma upper H Subscript k Baseline"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>…</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">H_1,\ldots ,H_k</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> such that each <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper H Subscript i"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">H_i</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is definably isomorphic to a semialgebraic linear group over a definable real closed field. As a corollary we obtain an o-minimal analogue of Cherlin’s conjecture.
We recast the problem of calculating Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) density into one of counting types, and thereby calculate bounds (often optimal) on the VC density for some weakly o-minimal, weakly quasi-o-minimal, … We recast the problem of calculating Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) density into one of counting types, and thereby calculate bounds (often optimal) on the VC density for some weakly o-minimal, weakly quasi-o-minimal, and <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper P"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">P</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-minimal theories.
It is known that families of graphs with a semialgebraic edge relation of bounded complexity satisfy much stronger regularity properties than arbitrary graphs, and can be decomposed into very homogeneous … It is known that families of graphs with a semialgebraic edge relation of bounded complexity satisfy much stronger regularity properties than arbitrary graphs, and can be decomposed into very homogeneous semialgebraic pieces up to a small error (see e.g. [33, 2, 16, 18]). We show that similar results can be obtained for families of graphs with the edge relation uniformly definable in a structure satisfying a certain model-theoretic property called distality, with respect to a large class of generically stable measures. Moreover, distality characterizes these strong regularity properties. This applies in particular to graphs definable in arbitrary o-minimal structures and in p -adics.
We consider some classical maps from the theory of abelian varieties and their moduli spaces, and we prove their definability on restricted domains in the o-minimal structure Ran,exp. In particular, … We consider some classical maps from the theory of abelian varieties and their moduli spaces, and we prove their definability on restricted domains in the o-minimal structure Ran,exp. In particular, we prove that the projective embedding of the moduli space of the principally polarized abelian variety Sp(2g,Z)\Hg is definable in Ran,exp when restricted to Siegel's fundamental set Fg. We also prove the definability on appropriate domains of embeddings of families of abelian varieties into projective spaces.
We continue the investigation of infinite, definably simple groups which are definable in o-minimal structures. In<italic>Definably simple groups in o-minimal structures</italic>, we showed that every such group is a semialgebraic … We continue the investigation of infinite, definably simple groups which are definable in o-minimal structures. In<italic>Definably simple groups in o-minimal structures</italic>, we showed that every such group is a semialgebraic group over a real closed field. Our main result here, stated in a model theoretic language, is that every such group is either bi-interpretable with an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero (when the group is stable) or with a real closed field (when the group is unstable). It follows that every abstract isomorphism between two unstable groups as above is a composition of a semialgebraic map with a field isomorphism. We discuss connections to theorems of Freudenthal, Borel-Tits and Weisfeiler on automorphisms of real Lie groups and simple algebraic groups over real closed fields.
The notion of an analytic-geometric category was introduced by v. d. Dries and Miller in [Lou van den Dries and Chris Miller, Geometric categories and o-minimal structures, Duke Math. J. … The notion of an analytic-geometric category was introduced by v. d. Dries and Miller in [Lou van den Dries and Chris Miller, Geometric categories and o-minimal structures, Duke Math. J. 84 (1996), no. 2, 497–540.]. It is a category of subsets of real analytic manifolds which extends the category of subanalytic sets. This paper discusses connections between the subanalytic category, or more generally analytic-geometric categories, and complex analytic geometry. The questions are of the following nature: We start with a subset A of a complex analytic manifold M and assume that A is an object of an analytic-geometric category (by viewing M as a real analytic manifold of double dimension). We then formulate conditions under which A, its closure or its image under a holomorphic map is a complex analytic set.
Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="German upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathfrak {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be an o-minimal expansion of a divisible ordered abelian group … Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="German upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathfrak {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be an o-minimal expansion of a divisible ordered abelian group <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="left-parenthesis upper R comma greater-than comma plus comma 0 comma 1 right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">(R,&gt;,+,0,1)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> with a distinguished positive element <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="1"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">1</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. Then the following dichotomy holds: Either there is a <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable binary operation <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="dot"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\cdot</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> such that <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="left-parenthesis upper R comma greater-than comma plus comma dot comma 0 comma 1 right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">(R,&gt;,+,\cdot ,0,1)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is an ordered real closed field; or, for every definable function <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="f colon upper R right-arrow upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>:</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">f:R\to R</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> there exists a <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="lamda element-of StartSet 0 EndSet union upper A u t left-parenthesis upper R comma plus right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">{</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">}</mml:mo> <mml:mo>∪</mml:mo> <mml:mi>Aut</mml:mi> <mml:mo>⁡</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\lambda \in \{0\}\cup \operatorname {Aut}(R,+)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> with <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="limit Underscript x right-arrow plus normal infinity Endscripts left-bracket f left-parenthesis x right-parenthesis minus lamda left-parenthesis x right-parenthesis right-bracket element-of upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:munder> <mml:mo movablelimits="true" form="prefix">lim</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:munder> <mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\lim _{x\to +\infty }[f(x)-\lambda (x)]\in R</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. This has some interesting consequences regarding groups definable in o-minimal structures. In particular, for an o-minimal structure <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="German upper M colon equals left-parenthesis upper M comma greater-than comma ellipsis right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>:=</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>…</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathfrak {M}:=(M,&gt;,\dots )</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> there are, up to definable isomorphism, at most two continuous (with respect to the product topology induced by the order) <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="German upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathfrak {M}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable groups with underlying set <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">M</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>.
Abstract Let M = 〈 M , +, &lt;, 0, {λ} λЄ D 〉 be an ordered vector space over an ordered division ring D , and G = 〈 … Abstract Let M = 〈 M , +, &lt;, 0, {λ} λЄ D 〉 be an ordered vector space over an ordered division ring D , and G = 〈 G , ⊕, e G 〉 an n -dimensional group definable in M . We show that if G is definably compact and definably connected with respect to the t -topology, then it is definably isomorphic to a ‘definable quotient group’ U/L , for some convex V -definable subgroup U of 〈 M n , +〉 and a lattice L of rank n . As two consequences, we derive Pillay's conjecture for a saturated M as above and we show that the o-minimal fundamental group of G is isomorphic to L .
We study the Vapnik–Chervonenkis (VC) density of definable families in certain stable first-order theories. In particular, we obtain uniform bounds on the VC density of definable families in finite U-rank … We study the Vapnik–Chervonenkis (VC) density of definable families in certain stable first-order theories. In particular, we obtain uniform bounds on the VC density of definable families in finite U-rank theories without the finite cover property, and we characterize those abelian groups for which there exist uniform bounds on the VC density of definable families.
We consider groups definable in the structure Ran and certain o-minimal expansions of it.We prove: If G = G, * is a definable abelian torsion-free group, then G is definably … We consider groups definable in the structure Ran and certain o-minimal expansions of it.We prove: If G = G, * is a definable abelian torsion-free group, then G is definably isomorphic to a direct sum of R, + k and R >0 , • m , for some k, m 0. Futhermore, this isomorphism is definable in the structure R, +, •, G .In particular, if G is semialgebraic, then the isomorphism is semialgebraic.We show how to use the above result to give an "o-minimal proof" to the classical Chevalley theorem for abelian algebraic groups over algebraically closed fields of characteristic zero.We also prove: Let M be an arbitrary o-minimal expansion of a real closed field R and G a definable group of dimension n.The group G is torsion-free if and only if G, as a definable group-manifold, is definably diffeomorphic to R n .
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content. A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Abstract We consider VC-minimal theories admitting unpackable generating families, and show that in such theories, forking of formulae over a model M is equivalent to containment in global types definable … Abstract We consider VC-minimal theories admitting unpackable generating families, and show that in such theories, forking of formulae over a model M is equivalent to containment in global types definable over M , generalizing a result of Dolich on o-minimal theories in [4].
Shepherdson [14] showed that for a discrete ordered ring I, I is a model of I Open iff I is an integer part of a real closed ordered field. In … Shepherdson [14] showed that for a discrete ordered ring I, I is a model of I Open iff I is an integer part of a real closed ordered field. In this paper, we consider integer parts satisfying PA . We show that if a real closed ordered field R has an integer part I that is a nonstandard model of PA (or even I Σ 4 ), then R must be recursively saturated. In particular, the real closure of I, RC (I) , is recursively saturated. We also show that if R is a countable recursively saturated real closed ordered field, then there is an integer part I such that R = RC(I) and I is a nonstandard model of PA .
Let ℛ be an o-minimal expansion of a real closed field R. We continue here the investigation we began in [11] of differentiability with respect to the algebraically closed field … Let ℛ be an o-minimal expansion of a real closed field R. We continue here the investigation we began in [11] of differentiability with respect to the algebraically closed field [Formula: see text]. We develop the basic theory of such K-differentiability for definable functions of several variables, proving theorems on removable singularities as well as analogues of the Weierstrass preparation and division theorems for definable functions. We consider also definably meromorphic functions and prove that every definable function which is meromorphic on K n is necessarily a rational function. We finally discuss definable analogues of complex analytic manifolds, with possible connections to the model theoretic work on compact complex manifolds, and present two examples of "nonstandard manifolds" in our setting.
We prove in particular that, in a large class of dp-minimal theories including the p-adics, definable types are dense amongst non-forking types. We prove in particular that, in a large class of dp-minimal theories including the p-adics, definable types are dense amongst non-forking types.
We prove that if <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper V"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">V</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {V}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is a superstable variety or one … We prove that if <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper V"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">V</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {V}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is a superstable variety or one with few countable models then <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper V"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">V</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {V}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is the varietal product of an affine variety and a combinatorial variety. Vaught’s conjecture for varieties is an immediate consequence.
We consider an arbitrary topological group G definable in a structure \mathcal M , such that some basis for the topology of G consists of sets definable in \mathcal M … We consider an arbitrary topological group G definable in a structure \mathcal M , such that some basis for the topology of G consists of sets definable in \mathcal M . To each such group G we associate a compact G -space of partial types, S^{\mu}_G(M)=\{p_{\mu}\colon p\in S_G(M)\} which is the quotient of the usual type space S_G(M) by the relation of two types being "infinitesimally close to each other". In the o-minimal setting, if p is a definable type then it has a corresponding definable subgroup Stab ^{\mu}(p) , which is the stabilizer of p_{\mu} . This group is nontrivial when p is unbounded in the sense of \mathcal M ; in fact it is a torsion-free solvable group. Along the way, we analyze the general construction of S^{\mu}_G(M) and its connection to the Samuel compactification of topological groups.
We present a systematic study of the regularity phenomena for NIP hypergraphs and connections to the theory of (locally) generically stable measures, providing a model-theoretic hypergraph version of the results … We present a systematic study of the regularity phenomena for NIP hypergraphs and connections to the theory of (locally) generically stable measures, providing a model-theoretic hypergraph version of the results from [L. Lovasz, B. Szegedy, Regularity partitions and the topology of graphons, An irregular mind, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, 415-446]. Besides, we revise the two extremal cases of regularity for stable and distal hypergraphs, improving and generalizing the results from [A. Chernikov, S. Starchenko, Regularity lemma for distal structures, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 20 (2018), 2437-2466] and [M. Malliaris, S. Shelah, Regularity lemmas for stable graphs, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 366.3, 2014, 1551-1585]. Finally, we consider a related question of the existence of large (approximately) homogeneous definable subsets of NIP hypergraphs and provide some positive results and counterexamples.
Abstract A bipartite graph $H = \left (V_1, V_2; E \right )$ with $\lvert V_1\rvert + \lvert V_2\rvert = n$ is semilinear if $V_i \subseteq \mathbb {R}^{d_i}$ for some $d_i$ … Abstract A bipartite graph $H = \left (V_1, V_2; E \right )$ with $\lvert V_1\rvert + \lvert V_2\rvert = n$ is semilinear if $V_i \subseteq \mathbb {R}^{d_i}$ for some $d_i$ and the edge relation E consists of the pairs of points $(x_1, x_2) \in V_1 \times V_2$ satisfying a fixed Boolean combination of s linear equalities and inequalities in $d_1 + d_2$ variables for some s . We show that for a fixed k , the number of edges in a $K_{k,k}$ -free semilinear H is almost linear in n , namely $\lvert E\rvert = O_{s,k,\varepsilon }\left (n^{1+\varepsilon }\right )$ for any $\varepsilon&gt; 0$ ; and more generally, $\lvert E\rvert = O_{s,k,r,\varepsilon }\left (n^{r-1 + \varepsilon }\right )$ for a $K_{k, \dotsc ,k}$ -free semilinear r -partite r -uniform hypergraph. As an application, we obtain the following incidence bound: given $n_1$ points and $n_2$ open boxes with axis-parallel sides in $\mathbb {R}^d$ such that their incidence graph is $K_{k,k}$ -free, there can be at most $O_{k,\varepsilon }\left (n^{1+\varepsilon }\right )$ incidences. The same bound holds if instead of boxes, one takes polytopes cut out by the translates of an arbitrary fixed finite set of half-spaces. We also obtain matching upper and (superlinear) lower bounds in the case of dyadic boxes on the plane, and point out some connections to the model-theoretic trichotomy in o -minimal structures (showing that the failure of an almost-linear bound for some definable graph allows one to recover the field operations from that graph in a definable manner).
We work in an o-minimal expansion of a real closed field. Using piecewise smoothness of definable functions we define the topological degree for definable continuous functions. Using this notion of … We work in an o-minimal expansion of a real closed field. Using piecewise smoothness of definable functions we define the topological degree for definable continuous functions. Using this notion of the degree we obtain a new proof for the existence of torsion points in a definably compact group, and also a new proof of an o-minimal analogue of the Brouwer fixed point theorem.
We give a stability-theoretic proof of the algebraic regularity lemma from [6], in a slightly strengthened form. We also point out that the underlying lemmas hold at a greater level … We give a stability-theoretic proof of the algebraic regularity lemma from [6], in a slightly strengthened form. We also point out that the underlying lemmas hold at a greater level of generality, namely \measurable theories and structures in the sense of Elwes-MacphersonSteinhorn.
In this note we give a proof of the Erdős–Hajnal conjecture for families of finite (hyper-)graphs without the <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="m"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">m</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-order … In this note we give a proof of the Erdős–Hajnal conjecture for families of finite (hyper-)graphs without the <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="m"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">m</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-order property. This theorem is in fact implicitly proved by M. Malliaris and S. Shelah (2014), however we use a new technique of independent interest combining local stability and pseudo-finite model theory.
In this paper, we completely characterize solvable real Lie groups definable in o-minimal expansions of the real field. In this paper, we completely characterize solvable real Lie groups definable in o-minimal expansions of the real field.
We prove a generalization of the Elekes–Szabó theorem [G. Elekes and E. Szabó, How to find groups? (and how to use them in Erdos geometry?), Combinatorica 32(5) 537–571 (2012)] for … We prove a generalization of the Elekes–Szabó theorem [G. Elekes and E. Szabó, How to find groups? (and how to use them in Erdos geometry?), Combinatorica 32(5) 537–571 (2012)] for relations definable in strongly minimal structures that are interpretable in distal structures.
Abstract We present a systematic study of the regularity phenomena for NIP hypergraphs and connections to the theory of (locally) generically stable measures, providing a model-theoretic hypergraph version of the … Abstract We present a systematic study of the regularity phenomena for NIP hypergraphs and connections to the theory of (locally) generically stable measures, providing a model-theoretic hypergraph version of the results of Alon-Fischer-Newman and Lov\'asz-Szegedy for graphs of bounded VC-dimension. We also consider the two extremal cases of regularity for stable and distal hypergraphs, improving and generalizing the corresponding results for graphs in the literature. Finally, we consider a related question of the existence of large (approximately) homogeneous definable subsets of NIP hypergraphs and provide some positive results and counterexamples, in particular for graphs definable in the p-adics.
We prove a generalizations of the Elekes-Szab\'o theorem for relations definable in strongly minimal structures that are interpretable in distal structures. We prove a generalizations of the Elekes-Szab\'o theorem for relations definable in strongly minimal structures that are interpretable in distal structures.
§1. Introduction . By and large, definitions of a differentiable structure on a set involve two ingredients, topology and algebra. However, in some cases, partial information on one or both … §1. Introduction . By and large, definitions of a differentiable structure on a set involve two ingredients, topology and algebra. However, in some cases, partial information on one or both of these is sufficient. A very simple example is that of the field ℝ (or any real closed field) where algebra alone determines the ordering and hence the topology of the field: In the case of the field ℂ, the algebraic structure is insufficient to determine the Euclidean topology; another topology, Zariski, is associated with the ield but this will be too coarse to give a diferentiable structure. A celebrated example of how partial algebraic and topological data ( G a locally euclidean group) determines a differentiable structure ( G is a Lie group) is Hilbert's 5th problem and its solution by Montgomery-Zippin and Gleason. The main result which we discuss here (see [13] for the full version) is of a similar flavor: we recover an algebraic and later differentiable structure from a topological data. We begin with a linearly ordered set ⟨ M , &lt;⟩, equipped with the order topology, and its cartesian products with the product topologies. We then consider the collection of definable subsets of M n , n = 1, 2, …, in some first order expansion ℳ of ⟨ M , &lt;⟩.
A bipartite graph $H = \left(V_1, V_2; E \right)$ with $|V_1| + |V_2| = n$ is semilinear if $V_i \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{d_i}$ for some $d_i$ and the edge relation $E$ consists … A bipartite graph $H = \left(V_1, V_2; E \right)$ with $|V_1| + |V_2| = n$ is semilinear if $V_i \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{d_i}$ for some $d_i$ and the edge relation $E$ consists of the pairs of points $(x_1, x_2) \in V_1 \times V_2$ satisfying a fixed Boolean combination of $s$ linear equalities and inequalities in $d_1 + d_2$ variables for some $s$. We show that for a fixed $k$, the number of edges in a $K_{k,k}$-free semilinear $H$ is almost linear in $n$, namely $|E| = O_{s,k,\varepsilon}(n^{1+\varepsilon})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$; and more generally, $|E| = O_{s,k,r,\varepsilon}(n^{r-1 + \varepsilon})$ for a $K_{k, \ldots,k}$-free semilinear $r$-partite $r$-uniform hypergraph. As an application, we obtain the following incidence bound: given $n_1$ points and $n_2$ open boxes with axis parallel sides in $\mathbb{R}^d$ such that their incidence graph is $K_{k,k}$-free, there can be at most $O_{k,\varepsilon}(n^{1+\varepsilon})$ incidences. The same bound holds if instead of boxes one takes polytopes cut out by the translates of an arbitrary fixed finite set of halfspaces. We also obtain matching upper and (superlinear) lower bounds in the case of dyadic boxes on the plane, and point out some connections to the model-theoretic trichotomy in $o$-minimal structures (showing that the failure of an almost linear bound for some definable graph allows one to recover the field operations from that graph in a definable manner).
It is known that families of graphs with a semialgebraic edge relation of bounded complexity satisfy much stronger regularity properties than arbitrary graphs, and that they can be decomposed into … It is known that families of graphs with a semialgebraic edge relation of bounded complexity satisfy much stronger regularity properties than arbitrary graphs, and that they can be decomposed into very homogeneous semialgebraic pieces up to a small error (e.g., see [33, 2, 16, 18]). We show that similar results can be obtained for families of graphs with the edge relation uniformly definable in a structure satisfying a certain model theoretic property called distality, with respect to a large class of generically stable measures. Moreover, distality characterizes these strong regularity properties. This applies in particular to graphs definable in arbitrary $o$-minimal structures and in $p$-adics.
In this short note we present an elementary proof of the Ax-Lindemann-Weierstrass theorem for abelian and semi-abelian varieties. The proof uses ideas of Pila, Ullmo, Yafaev, Zannier and is based … In this short note we present an elementary proof of the Ax-Lindemann-Weierstrass theorem for abelian and semi-abelian varieties. The proof uses ideas of Pila, Ullmo, Yafaev, Zannier and is based on basic properties of sets definable in o-minimal structures. It does not use the Pila-Wilkie counting theorem.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content. An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
By a variety we mean a class of algebras in a language , containing only function symbols, which is closed under homomorphisms, submodels, and products. A variety is said to … By a variety we mean a class of algebras in a language , containing only function symbols, which is closed under homomorphisms, submodels, and products. A variety is said to be strongly abelian if for any term in , the quasi-identity holds in . In [1] it was proved that if a strongly abelian variety has less than the maximal possible uncountable spectrum, then it is equivalent to a multisorted unary variety. Using Shelah's Main Gap theorem one can conclude that if is a classifiable (superstable without DOP or OTOP and shallow) strongly abelian variety then is a multisorted unary variety. In fact, it was known that this conclusion followed from the assumption of superstable without DOP alone. This paper is devoted to the proof that the superstability assumption is enough to obtain the same structure result. This fulfills a promise made in [2]. Namely, we will prove the following Theorem 0.1. If is a superstable strongly abelian variety, then it is multisorted unary .
In this short note we provide a relatively simple proof of the Erdős-Hajnal conjecture for families of finite (hyper-)graphs without the $k$-order property. It was originally proved by M. Malliaris … In this short note we provide a relatively simple proof of the Erdős-Hajnal conjecture for families of finite (hyper-)graphs without the $k$-order property. It was originally proved by M. Malliaris and S. Shelah in Regularity lemmas for stable graphs, Transactions AMS, 366, 2014, 1551-1585.
Abstract We investigate bounds in Ramsey’s theorem for relations definable in NIP structures. Applying model-theoretic methods to finitary combinatorics, we generalize a theorem of Bukh and Matousek ( Duke Mathematical … Abstract We investigate bounds in Ramsey’s theorem for relations definable in NIP structures. Applying model-theoretic methods to finitary combinatorics, we generalize a theorem of Bukh and Matousek ( Duke Mathematical Journal 163 (12) (2014), 2243–2270) from the semialgebraic case to arbitrary polynomially bounded $o$ -minimal expansions of $\mathbb{R}$ , and show that it does not hold in $\mathbb{R}_{\exp }$ . This provides a new combinatorial characterization of polynomial boundedness for $o$ -minimal structures. We also prove an analog for relations definable in $P$ -minimal structures, in particular for the field of the $p$ -adics. Generalizing Conlon et al. ( Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 366 (9) (2014), 5043–5065), we show that in distal structures the upper bound for $k$ -ary definable relations is given by the exponential tower of height $k-1$ .
We establish a cutting lemma for definable families of sets in distal structures, as well as the optimality of the distal cell decomposition for definable families of sets on the … We establish a cutting lemma for definable families of sets in distal structures, as well as the optimality of the distal cell decomposition for definable families of sets on the plane in $o$-minimal expansions of fields. Using it, we generalize the results in [J. Fox, J. Pach, A. Sheffer, A. Suk, and J. Zahl. A semi-algebraic version of Zarankiewicz's problem] on the semialgebraic planar Zarankiewicz problem to arbitrary $o$-minimal structures, in particular obtaining an $o$-minimal generalization of the Szemeredi-Trotter theorem.
Let $G$ be a unipotent group and $\mathcal F=\{F_t:t\in (0,\infty)\}$ a family of subsets of $G$, with $\mathcal F$ definable in an o-minimal expansion of the real field. Given a … Let $G$ be a unipotent group and $\mathcal F=\{F_t:t\in (0,\infty)\}$ a family of subsets of $G$, with $\mathcal F$ definable in an o-minimal expansion of the real field. Given a lattice $\Gamma\subseteq G$, we study the possible Hausdorff limits of $\pi(\mathcal F)$ in $G/\Gamma$ as $t$ tends to $\infty$ (here $\pi:G\to G/\Gamma$ is the canonical projection). Towards a solution, we associate to $\mathcal F$ finitely many real algebraic subgroups $L\subseteq G$, and, uniformly in $\Gamma$, determine if the only Hausdorff limit at $\infty$ is $G/\Gamma$, depending on whether $L^\Gamma=G$ or not. The special case of polynomial dilations of a definable set is treated in details.
A theorem of Elekes and Szabó recognizes algebraic groups among certain complex algebraic varieties with maximal size intersections with finite grids. We establish a generalization to relations of any arity … A theorem of Elekes and Szabó recognizes algebraic groups among certain complex algebraic varieties with maximal size intersections with finite grids. We establish a generalization to relations of any arity and dimension definable in: (1) stable structures with distal expansions (includes algebraically and differentially closed fields of characteristic 0) and (2) o-minimal expansions of groups. Our methods provide explicit bounds on the power-saving exponent in the nongroup case. Ingredients of the proof include a higher arity generalization of the abelian group configuration theorem in stable structures (along with a purely combinatorial variant characterizing Latin hypercubes that arise from abelian groups) and Zarankiewicz-style bounds for hypergraphs definable in distal structures.
Let G be a connected, simply connected nilpotent Lie group, identified with a real algebraic subgroup of UT(n,R), and let Γ be a lattice in G, with π:G→G∕Γ the quotient … Let G be a connected, simply connected nilpotent Lie group, identified with a real algebraic subgroup of UT(n,R), and let Γ be a lattice in G, with π:G→G∕Γ the quotient map. For a semialgebraic X⊆G, and more generally a definable set in an o-minimal structure on the real field, we consider the topological closure of π(X) in the compact nilmanifold G∕Γ. Our theorem describes cl(π(X)) in terms of finitely many families of cosets of real algebraic subgroups of G. The underlying families are extracted from X, independently of Γ. We also prove an equidistribution result in the case of curves.
Abstract We consider G , a linear algebraic group defined over $\Bbbk $ , an algebraically closed field (ACF). By considering $\Bbbk $ as an embedded residue field of an … Abstract We consider G , a linear algebraic group defined over $\Bbbk $ , an algebraically closed field (ACF). By considering $\Bbbk $ as an embedded residue field of an algebraically closed valued field K , we can associate to it a compact G -space $S^\mu _G(\Bbbk )$ consisting of $\mu $ -types on G . We show that for each $p_\mu \in S^\mu _G(\Bbbk )$ , $\mathrm {Stab}^\mu (p)=\mathrm {Stab}\left (p_\mu \right )$ is a solvable infinite algebraic group when $p_\mu $ is centered at infinity and residually algebraic. Moreover, we give a description of the dimension of $\mathrm {Stab}\left (p_\mu \right )$ in terms of the dimension of p .
Abstract We present a systematic study of the regularity phenomena for NIP hypergraphs and connections to the theory of (locally) generically stable measures, providing a model-theoretic hypergraph version of the … Abstract We present a systematic study of the regularity phenomena for NIP hypergraphs and connections to the theory of (locally) generically stable measures, providing a model-theoretic hypergraph version of the results of Alon-Fischer-Newman and Lov\'asz-Szegedy for graphs of bounded VC-dimension. We also consider the two extremal cases of regularity for stable and distal hypergraphs, improving and generalizing the corresponding results for graphs in the literature. Finally, we consider a related question of the existence of large (approximately) homogeneous definable subsets of NIP hypergraphs and provide some positive results and counterexamples, in particular for graphs definable in the p-adics.
Abstract A bipartite graph $H = \left (V_1, V_2; E \right )$ with $\lvert V_1\rvert + \lvert V_2\rvert = n$ is semilinear if $V_i \subseteq \mathbb {R}^{d_i}$ for some $d_i$ … Abstract A bipartite graph $H = \left (V_1, V_2; E \right )$ with $\lvert V_1\rvert + \lvert V_2\rvert = n$ is semilinear if $V_i \subseteq \mathbb {R}^{d_i}$ for some $d_i$ and the edge relation E consists of the pairs of points $(x_1, x_2) \in V_1 \times V_2$ satisfying a fixed Boolean combination of s linear equalities and inequalities in $d_1 + d_2$ variables for some s . We show that for a fixed k , the number of edges in a $K_{k,k}$ -free semilinear H is almost linear in n , namely $\lvert E\rvert = O_{s,k,\varepsilon }\left (n^{1+\varepsilon }\right )$ for any $\varepsilon&gt; 0$ ; and more generally, $\lvert E\rvert = O_{s,k,r,\varepsilon }\left (n^{r-1 + \varepsilon }\right )$ for a $K_{k, \dotsc ,k}$ -free semilinear r -partite r -uniform hypergraph. As an application, we obtain the following incidence bound: given $n_1$ points and $n_2$ open boxes with axis-parallel sides in $\mathbb {R}^d$ such that their incidence graph is $K_{k,k}$ -free, there can be at most $O_{k,\varepsilon }\left (n^{1+\varepsilon }\right )$ incidences. The same bound holds if instead of boxes, one takes polytopes cut out by the translates of an arbitrary fixed finite set of half-spaces. We also obtain matching upper and (superlinear) lower bounds in the case of dyadic boxes on the plane, and point out some connections to the model-theoretic trichotomy in o -minimal structures (showing that the failure of an almost-linear bound for some definable graph allows one to recover the field operations from that graph in a definable manner).
A theorem of Elekes and Szab\'{o} recognizes algebraic groups among certain complex algebraic varieties with maximal size intersections with finite grids. We establish a generalization to relations of any arity … A theorem of Elekes and Szab\'{o} recognizes algebraic groups among certain complex algebraic varieties with maximal size intersections with finite grids. We establish a generalization to relations of any arity and dimension, definable in: 1) stable structures with distal expansions (includes algebraically and differentially closed fields of characteristic $0$); and 2) $o$-minimal expansions of groups. Our methods provide explicit bounds on the power saving exponent in the non-group case. Ingredients of the proof include: a higher arity generalization of the abelian group configuration theorem in stable structures, along with a purely combinatorial variant characterizing Latin hypercubes that arise from abelian groups; and Zarankiewicz-style bounds for hypergraphs definable in distal structures.
A bipartite graph $H = \left(V_1, V_2; E \right)$ with $|V_1| + |V_2| = n$ is semilinear if $V_i \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{d_i}$ for some $d_i$ and the edge relation $E$ consists … A bipartite graph $H = \left(V_1, V_2; E \right)$ with $|V_1| + |V_2| = n$ is semilinear if $V_i \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{d_i}$ for some $d_i$ and the edge relation $E$ consists of the pairs of points $(x_1, x_2) \in V_1 \times V_2$ satisfying a fixed Boolean combination of $s$ linear equalities and inequalities in $d_1 + d_2$ variables for some $s$. We show that for a fixed $k$, the number of edges in a $K_{k,k}$-free semilinear $H$ is almost linear in $n$, namely $|E| = O_{s,k,\varepsilon}(n^{1+\varepsilon})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$; and more generally, $|E| = O_{s,k,r,\varepsilon}(n^{r-1 + \varepsilon})$ for a $K_{k, \ldots,k}$-free semilinear $r$-partite $r$-uniform hypergraph. As an application, we obtain the following incidence bound: given $n_1$ points and $n_2$ open boxes with axis parallel sides in $\mathbb{R}^d$ such that their incidence graph is $K_{k,k}$-free, there can be at most $O_{k,\varepsilon}(n^{1+\varepsilon})$ incidences. The same bound holds if instead of boxes one takes polytopes cut out by the translates of an arbitrary fixed finite set of halfspaces. We also obtain matching upper and (superlinear) lower bounds in the case of dyadic boxes on the plane, and point out some connections to the model-theoretic trichotomy in $o$-minimal structures (showing that the failure of an almost linear bound for some definable graph allows one to recover the field operations from that graph in a definable manner).
We prove a generalization of the Elekes–Szabó theorem [G. Elekes and E. Szabó, How to find groups? (and how to use them in Erdos geometry?), Combinatorica 32(5) 537–571 (2012)] for … We prove a generalization of the Elekes–Szabó theorem [G. Elekes and E. Szabó, How to find groups? (and how to use them in Erdos geometry?), Combinatorica 32(5) 537–571 (2012)] for relations definable in strongly minimal structures that are interpretable in distal structures.
A bipartite graph $H = \left(V_1, V_2; E \right)$ with $|V_1| + |V_2| = n$ is semilinear if $V_i \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{d_i}$ for some $d_i$ and the edge relation $E$ consists … A bipartite graph $H = \left(V_1, V_2; E \right)$ with $|V_1| + |V_2| = n$ is semilinear if $V_i \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{d_i}$ for some $d_i$ and the edge relation $E$ consists of the pairs of points $(x_1, x_2) \in V_1 \times V_2$ satisfying a fixed Boolean combination of $s$ linear equalities and inequalities in $d_1 + d_2$ variables for some $s$. We show that for a fixed $k$, the number of edges in a $K_{k,k}$-free semilinear $H$ is almost linear in $n$, namely $|E| = O_{s,k,\varepsilon}(n^{1+\varepsilon})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$; and more generally, $|E| = O_{s,k,r,\varepsilon}(n^{r-1 + \varepsilon})$ for a $K_{k, \ldots,k}$-free semilinear $r$-partite $r$-uniform hypergraph. As an application, we obtain the following incidence bound: given $n_1$ points and $n_2$ open boxes with axis parallel sides in $\mathbb{R}^d$ such that their incidence graph is $K_{k,k}$-free, there can be at most $O_{k,\varepsilon}(n^{1+\varepsilon})$ incidences. The same bound holds if instead of boxes one takes polytopes cut out by the translates of an arbitrary fixed finite set of halfspaces. We also obtain matching upper and (superlinear) lower bounds in the case of dyadic boxes on the plane, and point out some connections to the model-theoretic trichotomy in $o$-minimal structures (showing that the failure of an almost linear bound for some definable graph allows one to recover the field operations from that graph in a definable manner).
We consider $G$, a linear group defined over $k$, an algebraically closed field. By considering $k$ as an embedded residue field of an algebraically closed valued field $K$, we can … We consider $G$, a linear group defined over $k$, an algebraically closed field. By considering $k$ as an embedded residue field of an algebraically closed valued field $K$, we can associate to it a compact $G$-space $S^\mu_G(k)$, consisting of $\mu$-types on $G$. We showed that for each $p_\mu\in S^\mu_G(k)$, $\text{Stab}^\mu(p)=\text{Stab}(p_\mu)$ is a solvable infinite algebraic group when $p_\mu$ is centered at infinity and residually algebraic. Moreover we give a description of the dimension $\text{Stab}(p_\mu)$ in terms of dimension of $p$.
Abstract We investigate bounds in Ramsey’s theorem for relations definable in NIP structures. Applying model-theoretic methods to finitary combinatorics, we generalize a theorem of Bukh and Matousek ( Duke Mathematical … Abstract We investigate bounds in Ramsey’s theorem for relations definable in NIP structures. Applying model-theoretic methods to finitary combinatorics, we generalize a theorem of Bukh and Matousek ( Duke Mathematical Journal 163 (12) (2014), 2243–2270) from the semialgebraic case to arbitrary polynomially bounded $o$ -minimal expansions of $\mathbb{R}$ , and show that it does not hold in $\mathbb{R}_{\exp }$ . This provides a new combinatorial characterization of polynomial boundedness for $o$ -minimal structures. We also prove an analog for relations definable in $P$ -minimal structures, in particular for the field of the $p$ -adics. Generalizing Conlon et al. ( Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 366 (9) (2014), 5043–5065), we show that in distal structures the upper bound for $k$ -ary definable relations is given by the exponential tower of height $k-1$ .
Let $G$ be a connected, simply connected nilpotent Lie group, identified with a real algebraic subgroup of $\mathrm{UT}(n,\mathbb{R})$, and let $\Gamma$ be a lattice in $G$, with $\pi:G\to G/\Gamma$ the … Let $G$ be a connected, simply connected nilpotent Lie group, identified with a real algebraic subgroup of $\mathrm{UT}(n,\mathbb{R})$, and let $\Gamma$ be a lattice in $G$, with $\pi:G\to G/\Gamma$ the quotient map. For a semi-algebraic $X\subseteq G$, and more generally a definable set in an o-minimal structure on the real field, we consider the topological closure of $\pi(X)$ in the compact nilmanifold $G/\Gamma$. Our theorem describes $\mathrm{cl}(\pi(X))$ in terms of finitely many families of cosets of real algebraic subgroups of $G$. The underlying families are extracted from $X$, independently of $\Gamma$. We also prove an equidistribution result in the case of curves.
In this short note we present an elementary proof of eorem 1.2 from [UY2], and also the Ax–Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem for abelian and semi-abelian varieties. The proof uses ideas of Pila, … In this short note we present an elementary proof of eorem 1.2 from [UY2], and also the Ax–Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem for abelian and semi-abelian varieties. The proof uses ideas of Pila, Ullmo, Yafaev, Zannier (see, e.g., [PZ]) and is based on basic properties of sets definable in o-minimal structures. It does not use the Pila–Wilkie counting theorem.
It is known that families of graphs with a semialgebraic edge relation of bounded complexity satisfy much stronger regularity properties than arbitrary graphs, and can be decomposed into very homogeneous … It is known that families of graphs with a semialgebraic edge relation of bounded complexity satisfy much stronger regularity properties than arbitrary graphs, and can be decomposed into very homogeneous semialgebraic pieces up to a small error (see e.g. [33, 2, 16, 18]). We show that similar results can be obtained for families of graphs with the edge relation uniformly definable in a structure satisfying a certain model-theoretic property called distality, with respect to a large class of generically stable measures. Moreover, distality characterizes these strong regularity properties. This applies in particular to graphs definable in arbitrary o-minimal structures and in p -adics.
We prove a generalizations of the Elekes-Szab\'o theorem for relations definable in strongly minimal structures that are interpretable in distal structures. We prove a generalizations of the Elekes-Szab\'o theorem for relations definable in strongly minimal structures that are interpretable in distal structures.
We prove a generalizations of the Elekes-Szabo theorem for relations definable in strongly minimal structures that are interpretable in distal structures. We prove a generalizations of the Elekes-Szabo theorem for relations definable in strongly minimal structures that are interpretable in distal structures.
Let $G$ be a connected, simply connected nilpotent Lie group, identified with a real algebraic subgroup of $\mathrm{UT}(n,\mathbb{R})$, and let $\Gamma$ be a lattice in $G$, with $\pi:G\to G/\Gamma$ the … Let $G$ be a connected, simply connected nilpotent Lie group, identified with a real algebraic subgroup of $\mathrm{UT}(n,\mathbb{R})$, and let $\Gamma$ be a lattice in $G$, with $\pi:G\to G/\Gamma$ the quotient map. For a semi-algebraic $X\subseteq G$, and more generally a definable set in an o-minimal structure on the real field, we consider the topological closure of $\pi(X)$ in the compact nilmanifold $G/\Gamma$. Our theorem describes $\mathrm{cl}(\pi(X))$ in terms of finitely many families of cosets of real algebraic subgroups of $G$. The underlying families are extracted from $X$, independently of $\Gamma$. We also prove an equidistribution result in the case of curves.
We prove a generalizations of the Elekes-Szab\'o theorem for relations definable in strongly minimal structures that are interpretable in distal structures. We prove a generalizations of the Elekes-Szab\'o theorem for relations definable in strongly minimal structures that are interpretable in distal structures.
We consider an arbitrary topological group G definable in a structure \mathcal M , such that some basis for the topology of G consists of sets definable in \mathcal M … We consider an arbitrary topological group G definable in a structure \mathcal M , such that some basis for the topology of G consists of sets definable in \mathcal M . To each such group G we associate a compact G -space of partial types, S^{\mu}_G(M)=\{p_{\mu}\colon p\in S_G(M)\} which is the quotient of the usual type space S_G(M) by the relation of two types being "infinitesimally close to each other". In the o-minimal setting, if p is a definable type then it has a corresponding definable subgroup Stab ^{\mu}(p) , which is the stabilizer of p_{\mu} . This group is nontrivial when p is unbounded in the sense of \mathcal M ; in fact it is a torsion-free solvable group. Along the way, we analyze the general construction of S^{\mu}_G(M) and its connection to the Samuel compactification of topological groups.
We consider the covering map $\pi:\mathbb{C}^n\to \mathbb{T}$ of a compact complex torus. Given an algebraic variety $X\subseteq \mathbb{C}^n$ we describe the topological closure of $\pi(X)$ in $\mathbb T$. We obtain … We consider the covering map $\pi:\mathbb{C}^n\to \mathbb{T}$ of a compact complex torus. Given an algebraic variety $X\subseteq \mathbb{C}^n$ we describe the topological closure of $\pi(X)$ in $\mathbb T$. We obtain a similar description when $\mathbb{T}$ is a real torus and $X\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ is a set definable in an o-minimal structure over the reals.
We consider the covering map $\pi:\mathbb{C}^n\to \mathbb{T}$ of a compact complex torus. Given an algebraic variety $X\subseteq \mathbb{C}^n$ we describe the topological closure of $\pi(X)$ in $\mathbb T$. We obtain … We consider the covering map $\pi:\mathbb{C}^n\to \mathbb{T}$ of a compact complex torus. Given an algebraic variety $X\subseteq \mathbb{C}^n$ we describe the topological closure of $\pi(X)$ in $\mathbb T$. We obtain a similar description when $\mathbb{T}$ is a real torus and $X\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ is a set definable in an o-minimal structure over the reals.
In this note we give a proof of the Erdős–Hajnal conjecture for families of finite (hyper-)graphs without the <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="m"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">m</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-order … In this note we give a proof of the Erdős–Hajnal conjecture for families of finite (hyper-)graphs without the <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="m"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">m</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-order property. This theorem is in fact implicitly proved by M. Malliaris and S. Shelah (2014), however we use a new technique of independent interest combining local stability and pseudo-finite model theory.
We establish a cutting lemma for definable families of sets in distal structures, as well as the optimality of the distal cell decomposition for definable families of sets on the … We establish a cutting lemma for definable families of sets in distal structures, as well as the optimality of the distal cell decomposition for definable families of sets on the plane in $o$-minimal expansions of fields. Using it, we generalize the results in [J. Fox, J. Pach, A. Sheffer, A. Suk, and J. Zahl. A semi-algebraic version of Zarankiewicz's problem] on the semialgebraic planar Zarankiewicz problem to arbitrary $o$-minimal structures, in particular obtaining an $o$-minimal generalization of the Szemeredi-Trotter theorem.
We present a systematic study of the regularity phenomena for NIP hypergraphs and connections to the theory of (locally) generically stable measures, providing a model-theoretic hypergraph version of the results … We present a systematic study of the regularity phenomena for NIP hypergraphs and connections to the theory of (locally) generically stable measures, providing a model-theoretic hypergraph version of the results from [L. Lovasz, B. Szegedy, Regularity partitions and the topology of graphons, An irregular mind, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, 415-446]. Besides, we revise the two extremal cases of regularity for stable and distal hypergraphs, improving and generalizing the results from [A. Chernikov, S. Starchenko, Regularity lemma for distal structures, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 20 (2018), 2437-2466] and [M. Malliaris, S. Shelah, Regularity lemmas for stable graphs, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 366.3, 2014, 1551-1585]. Finally, we consider a related question of the existence of large (approximately) homogeneous definable subsets of NIP hypergraphs and provide some positive results and counterexamples.
In this paper, we completely characterize solvable real Lie groups definable in o-minimal expansions of the real field. In this paper, we completely characterize solvable real Lie groups definable in o-minimal expansions of the real field.
In this short note we present an elementary proof of the Ax-Lindemann-Weierstrass theorem for abelian and semi-abelian varieties. The proof uses ideas of Pila, Ullmo, Yafaev, Zannier and is based … In this short note we present an elementary proof of the Ax-Lindemann-Weierstrass theorem for abelian and semi-abelian varieties. The proof uses ideas of Pila, Ullmo, Yafaev, Zannier and is based on basic properties of sets definable in o-minimal structures. It does not use the Pila-Wilkie counting theorem.
We present a systematic study of the regularity phenomena for NIP hypergraphs and connections to the theory of (locally) generically stable measures, providing a model-theoretic hypergraph version of the results … We present a systematic study of the regularity phenomena for NIP hypergraphs and connections to the theory of (locally) generically stable measures, providing a model-theoretic hypergraph version of the results from [L. Lov\'asz, B. Szegedy, "Regularity partitions and the topology of graphons", An irregular mind, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, 415-446]. Besides, we revise the two extremal cases of regularity for stable and distal hypergraphs, improving and generalizing the results from [A. Chernikov, S. Starchenko, "Regularity lemma for distal structures", J. Eur. Math. Soc. 20 (2018), 2437-2466] and [M. Malliaris, S. Shelah, "Regularity lemmas for stable graphs", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 366.3, 2014, 1551-1585]. Finally, we consider a related question of the existence of large (approximately) homogeneous definable subsets of NIP hypergraphs and provide some positive results and counterexamples.
We establish a cutting lemma for definable families of sets in distal structures, as well as the optimality of the distal cell decomposition for definable families of sets on the … We establish a cutting lemma for definable families of sets in distal structures, as well as the optimality of the distal cell decomposition for definable families of sets on the plane in $o$-minimal expansions of fields. Using it, we generalize the results in [J. Fox, J. Pach, A. Sheffer, A. Suk, and J. Zahl. "A semi-algebraic version of Zarankiewicz's problem"] on the semialgebraic planar Zarankiewicz problem to arbitrary $o$-minimal structures, in particular obtaining an $o$-minimal generalization of the Szemerédi-Trotter theorem.
We recast the problem of calculating Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) density into one of counting types, and thereby calculate bounds (often optimal) on the VC density for some weakly o-minimal, weakly quasi-o-minimal, … We recast the problem of calculating Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) density into one of counting types, and thereby calculate bounds (often optimal) on the VC density for some weakly o-minimal, weakly quasi-o-minimal, and <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper P"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">P</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-minimal theories.
It is known that families of graphs with a semialgebraic edge relation of bounded complexity satisfy much stronger regularity properties than arbitrary graphs, and that they can be decomposed into … It is known that families of graphs with a semialgebraic edge relation of bounded complexity satisfy much stronger regularity properties than arbitrary graphs, and that they can be decomposed into very homogeneous semialgebraic pieces up to a small error (e.g., see [33, 2, 16, 18]). We show that similar results can be obtained for families of graphs with the edge relation uniformly definable in a structure satisfying a certain model theoretic property called distality, with respect to a large class of generically stable measures. Moreover, distality characterizes these strong regularity properties. This applies in particular to graphs definable in arbitrary $o$-minimal structures and in $p$-adics.
In this short note we provide a relatively simple proof of the Erdős-Hajnal conjecture for families of finite (hyper-)graphs without the $k$-order property. It was originally proved by M. Malliaris … In this short note we provide a relatively simple proof of the Erdős-Hajnal conjecture for families of finite (hyper-)graphs without the $k$-order property. It was originally proved by M. Malliaris and S. Shelah in Regularity lemmas for stable graphs, Transactions AMS, 366, 2014, 1551-1585.
It is known that families of graphs with a semialgebraic edge relation of bounded complexity satisfy much stronger regularity properties than arbitrary graphs, and that they can be decomposed into … It is known that families of graphs with a semialgebraic edge relation of bounded complexity satisfy much stronger regularity properties than arbitrary graphs, and that they can be decomposed into very homogeneous semialgebraic pieces up to a small error (e.g., see [33, 2, 16, 18]). We show that similar results can be obtained for families of graphs with the edge relation uniformly definable in a structure satisfying a certain model theoretic property called distality, with respect to a large class of generically stable measures. Moreover, distality characterizes these strong regularity properties. This applies in particular to graphs definable in arbitrary $o$-minimal structures and in $p$-adics.
In this paper we completely characterize solvable real Lie groups definable in o-minimal expansions of the real field. In this paper we completely characterize solvable real Lie groups definable in o-minimal expansions of the real field.
In this short note we provide a relatively simple proof of the Erdős-Hajnal conjecture for families of finite (hyper-)graphs without the $k$-order property. It was originally proved by M. Malliaris … In this short note we provide a relatively simple proof of the Erdős-Hajnal conjecture for families of finite (hyper-)graphs without the $k$-order property. It was originally proved by M. Malliaris and S. Shelah in "Regularity lemmas for stable graphs", Transactions AMS, 366, 2014, 1551-1585.
We prove in particular that, in a large class of dp-minimal theories including the p-adics, definable types are dense amongst non-forking types. We prove in particular that, in a large class of dp-minimal theories including the p-adics, definable types are dense amongst non-forking types.
We consider an arbitrary topological group $G$ definable in a structure $\mathcal M$, such that some basis for the topology of $G$ consists of sets definable in $\mathcal M$. To … We consider an arbitrary topological group $G$ definable in a structure $\mathcal M$, such that some basis for the topology of $G$ consists of sets definable in $\mathcal M$. To each such group $G$ we associate a compact $G$-space of partial types $S^\mu_G(M)=\{p_\mu:p\in S_G(M)\}$ which is the quotient of the usual type space $S_G(M)$ by the relation of two types being infinitesimally close to each other. In the o-minimal setting, if $p$ is a definable type then it has a corresponding definable subgroup $Stab_\mu(p)$, which is the stabilizer of $p_\mu$. This group is nontrivial when $p$ is unbounded in the sense of $\mathcal M$; in fact it is a torsion-free solvable group. Along the way, we analyze the general construction of $S^\mu_G(M)$ and its connection to the Samuel compactification of topological groups.
We consider an arbitrary topological group $G$ definable in a structure $\mathcal M$, such that some basis for the topology of $G$ consists of sets definable in $\mathcal M$. To … We consider an arbitrary topological group $G$ definable in a structure $\mathcal M$, such that some basis for the topology of $G$ consists of sets definable in $\mathcal M$. To each such group $G$ we associate a compact $G$-space of partial types $S^\mu_G(M)=\{p_\mu:p\in S_G(M)\}$ which is the quotient of the usual type space $S_G(M)$ by the relation of two types being "infinitesimally close to each other". In the o-minimal setting, if $p$ is a definable type then it has a corresponding definable subgroup $Stab_\mu(p)$, which is the stabilizer of $p_\mu$. This group is nontrivial when $p$ is unbounded in the sense of $\mathcal M$; in fact it is a torsion-free solvable group. Along the way, we analyze the general construction of $S^\mu_G(M)$ and its connection to the Samuel compactification of topological groups.
We give a stability-theoretic proof of the algebraic regularity lemma from [6], in a slightly strengthened form. We also point out that the underlying lemmas hold at a greater level … We give a stability-theoretic proof of the algebraic regularity lemma from [6], in a slightly strengthened form. We also point out that the underlying lemmas hold at a greater level of generality, namely \measurable theories and structures in the sense of Elwes-MacphersonSteinhorn.
We consider some classical maps from the theory of abelian varieties and their moduli spaces, and we prove their definability on restricted domains in the o-minimal structure Ran,exp. In particular, … We consider some classical maps from the theory of abelian varieties and their moduli spaces, and we prove their definability on restricted domains in the o-minimal structure Ran,exp. In particular, we prove that the projective embedding of the moduli space of the principally polarized abelian variety Sp(2g,Z)\Hg is definable in Ran,exp when restricted to Siegel's fundamental set Fg. We also prove the definability on appropriate domains of embeddings of families of abelian varieties into projective spaces.
We study the Vapnik–Chervonenkis (VC) density of definable families in certain stable first-order theories. In particular, we obtain uniform bounds on the VC density of definable families in finite U-rank … We study the Vapnik–Chervonenkis (VC) density of definable families in certain stable first-order theories. In particular, we obtain uniform bounds on the VC density of definable families in finite U-rank theories without the finite cover property, and we characterize those abelian groups for which there exist uniform bounds on the VC density of definable families.
We give a stability theoretic proof of the algebraic regularity lemma of Tao, making use of a lemma of Hrushovski. We also point out that the underlying results hold at … We give a stability theoretic proof of the algebraic regularity lemma of Tao, making use of a lemma of Hrushovski. We also point out that the underlying results hold at the level of measurable theories and structures in the sense of Elwes, Macpherson and Steinhorn.
Abstract We consider VC-minimal theories admitting unpackable generating families, and show that in such theories, forking of formulae over a model M is equivalent to containment in global types definable … Abstract We consider VC-minimal theories admitting unpackable generating families, and show that in such theories, forking of formulae over a model M is equivalent to containment in global types definable over M , generalizing a result of Dolich on o-minimal theories in [4].
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content. An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
We show that the first order structure whose underlying universe is $\mathbb C$ and whose basic relations are all algebraic subsets of $\mathbb C^2$ does not have quantifier elimination. Since … We show that the first order structure whose underlying universe is $\mathbb C$ and whose basic relations are all algebraic subsets of $\mathbb C^2$ does not have quantifier elimination. Since an algebraic subset of $\mathbb C ^2$ is either of dimension $
It is known that families of graphs with a semialgebraic edge relation of bounded complexity satisfy much stronger regularity properties than arbitrary graphs, and can be decomposed into very homogeneous … It is known that families of graphs with a semialgebraic edge relation of bounded complexity satisfy much stronger regularity properties than arbitrary graphs, and can be decomposed into very homogeneous semialgebraic pieces up to a small error (see e.g. [33, 2, 16, 18]). We show that similar results can be obtained for families of graphs with the edge relation uniformly definable in a structure satisfying a certain model-theoretic property called distality, with respect to a large class of generically stable measures. Moreover, distality characterizes these strong regularity properties. This applies in particular to graphs definable in arbitrary o-minimal structures and in p -adics.
The paper introduces the notion of definable compactness and within the context of o-minimal structures proves several topological properties of definably compact spaces. In particular a definable set in an … The paper introduces the notion of definable compactness and within the context of o-minimal structures proves several topological properties of definably compact spaces. In particular a definable set in an o-minimal structure is definably compact (with respect to the subspace topology) if and only if it is closed and bounded. Definable compactness is then applied to the study of groups and rings in o-minimal structures. The main result proved is that any infinite definable group in an o-minimal structure that is not definably compact contains a definable torsion-free subgroup of dimension 1. With this theorem, a complete characterization is given of all rings without zero divisors that are definable in o-minimal structures. The paper concludes with several examples illustrating some limitations on extending the theorem.
We study forking, Lascar strong types, Keisler measures and definable groups, under an assumption of NIP (not the independence property), continuing aspects of the paper [16]. Among key results are … We study forking, Lascar strong types, Keisler measures and definable groups, under an assumption of NIP (not the independence property), continuing aspects of the paper [16]. Among key results are (i) if p = \mathrm{tp}(b/A) does not fork over A then the Lascar strong type of b over A coincides with the compact strong type of b over A and any global nonforking extension of p is Borel definable over \mathrm{bdd}(A) , (ii) analogous statements for Keisler measures and definable groups, including the fact that G^{000} = G^{00} for G definably amenable, (iii) definitions, characterizations and properties of “generically stable” types and groups, (iv) uniqueness of invariant (under the group action) Keisler measures on groups with finitely satisfiable generics, (v) a proof of the compact domination conjecture for (definably compact) commutative groups in o -minimal expansions of real closed fields.
Abstract This book gives an account of the fundamental results in geometric stability theory, a subject that has grown out of categoricity and classification theory. This approach studies the fine … Abstract This book gives an account of the fundamental results in geometric stability theory, a subject that has grown out of categoricity and classification theory. This approach studies the fine structure of models of stable theories, using the geometry of forking; this often achieves global results relevant to classification theory. Topics range from Zilber-Cherlin classification of infinite locally finite homogenous geometries, to regular types, their geometries, and their role in superstable theories. The structure and existence of definable groups is featured prominently, as is work by Hrushovski. The book is unique in the range and depth of material covered and will be invaluable to anyone interested in modern model theory.
We recast the problem of calculating Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) density into one of counting types, and thereby calculate bounds (often optimal) on the VC density for some weakly o-minimal, weakly quasi-o-minimal, … We recast the problem of calculating Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) density into one of counting types, and thereby calculate bounds (often optimal) on the VC density for some weakly o-minimal, weakly quasi-o-minimal, and <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper P"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">P</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-minimal theories.
Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G equals mathematical left-angle upper G comma dot mathematical right-angle"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> … Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G equals mathematical left-angle upper G comma dot mathematical right-angle"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}=\langle G, \cdot \rangle</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be a group definable in an o-minimal structure <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {M}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. A subset <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper H"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">H</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable if <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper H"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">H</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is definable in the structure <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="mathematical left-angle upper G comma dot mathematical right-angle"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\langle G,\cdot \rangle</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> (while <italic>definable</italic> means definable in the structure <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {M}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>). Assume <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> has no <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable proper subgroup of finite index. In this paper we prove that if <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> has no nontrivial abelian normal subgroup, then <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is the direct product of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {G}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable subgroups <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper H 1 comma ellipsis comma upper H Subscript k Baseline"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>…</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">H_1,\ldots ,H_k</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> such that each <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper H Subscript i"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">H_i</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is definably isomorphic to a semialgebraic linear group over a definable real closed field. As a corollary we obtain an o-minimal analogue of Cherlin’s conjecture.
We formulate the measure analogue of generically stable types in first order theories with $NIP$ (without the independence property), giving several characterizations, answering some questions from an earlier paper by … We formulate the measure analogue of generically stable types in first order theories with $NIP$ (without the independence property), giving several characterizations, answering some questions from an earlier paper by Hrushovski and Pillay, and giving another treatment of uniqueness results from the same paper. We introduce a notion of "generic compact domination", relating it to stationarity of the Keisler measures, and also giving definable group versions. We also prove the "approximate definability" of arbitrary Borel probability measures on definable sets in the real and $p$-adic fields.
Let M be an o-minimal expansion of a real closed field. Let G be a definably compact definably connected abelian n-dimensional group definable in M. We show the following: the … Let M be an o-minimal expansion of a real closed field. Let G be a definably compact definably connected abelian n-dimensional group definable in M. We show the following: the o-minimal fundamental group of G is isomorphic to ℤ n ; for each k&gt;0, the k-torsion subgroup of G is isomorphic to (ℤ/kℤ) n , and the o-minimal cohomology algebra over ℚ of G is isomorphic to the exterior algebra over ℚ with n generators of degree one.
We develop a framework in which Szemerédi's celebrated Regularity Lemma for graphs interacts with core model-theoretic ideas and techniques. Our work relies on a coincidence of ideas from model theory … We develop a framework in which Szemerédi's celebrated Regularity Lemma for graphs interacts with core model-theoretic ideas and techniques. Our work relies on a coincidence of ideas from model theory and graph theory: arbitrarily large half-graphs coincide with model-theoretic instability, so in their absence, structure theorems and technology from stability theory apply. In one direction, we address a problem from the classical Szemerédi theory. It was known that the "irregular pairs" in the statement of Szemerédi's Regularity Lemma cannot be eliminated, due to the counterexample of half-graphs (i.e., the order property, corresponding to model-theoretic instability). We show that half-graphs are the only essential difficulty, by giving a much stronger version of Szemerédi's Regularity Lemma for models of stable theories of graphs (i.e. graphs with the non-$k_*$-order property), in which there are no irregular pairs, the bounds are significantly improved, and each component satisfies an indivisibility condition. In the other direction, we take a more model-theoretic approach, and give several new Szemerédi-type partition theorems for models of stable theories of graphs. The first theorem gives a partition of any such graph into indiscernible components, meaning here that each component is either a complete or an empty graph, whose interaction is strongly uniform. This relies on a finitary version of the classic model-theoretic fact that stable theories admit large sets of indiscernibles, by showing that in models of stable theories of graphs one can extract much larger indiscernible sets than expected by Ramsey's theorem. The second and third theorems allow for a much smaller number of components at the cost of weakening the "indivisibility" condition on the components. We also discuss some extensions to graphs without the independence property. All graphs are finite and all partitions are equitable, i.e. the sizes of the components differ by at most 1. In the last three theorems, the number of components depends on the size of the graph; in the first theorem quoted, this number is a function of $\epsilon$ only as in the usual Szemerédi Regularity Lemma.
We continue investigating the structure of externally definable sets in <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="normal upper N normal upper I normal upper P"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi> … We continue investigating the structure of externally definable sets in <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="normal upper N normal upper I normal upper P"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathrm {NIP}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> theories and preservation of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="normal upper N normal upper I normal upper P"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathrm {NIP}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> after expanding by new predicates. Most importantly: types over finite sets are uniformly definable; over a model, a family of non-forking instances of a formula (with parameters ranging over a type-definable set) can be covered with finitely many invariant types; we give some criteria for the boundedness of an expansion by a new predicate in a distal theory; naming an arbitrary small indiscernible sequence preserves <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="normal upper N normal upper I normal upper P"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathrm {NIP}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>, while naming a large one doesn’t; there are models of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="normal upper N normal upper I normal upper P"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathrm {NIP}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> theories over which all 1-types are definable, but not all <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="n"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">n</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-types.
Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be an O-minimal expansion of the field of real … Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be an O-minimal expansion of the field of real numbers. If <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is not polynomially bounded, then the exponential function is definable (without parameters) in <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. If <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is polynomially bounded, then for every definable function <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="f colon double-struck upper R right-arrow double-struck upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>:</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">→<!-- → --></mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">f:\mathbb {R} \to \mathbb {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>, <italic>f</italic> not ultimately identically 0, there exist <italic>c</italic>, <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="r element-of double-struck upper R comma c not-equals 0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∈<!-- ∈ --></mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≠<!-- ≠ --></mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">r \in \mathbb {R},c \ne 0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>, such that <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="x right-arrow from bar x Superscript r Baseline colon left-parenthesis 0 comma plus normal infinity right-parenthesis right-arrow double-struck upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">↦<!-- ↦ --></mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>:</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞<!-- ∞ --></mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">→<!-- → --></mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">x \mapsto {x^r}:(0, + \infty ) \to \mathbb {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is definable in <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> and <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="limit Underscript x right-arrow plus normal infinity Endscripts f left-parenthesis x right-parenthesis slash x Superscript r Baseline equals c"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:munder> <mml:mo movablelimits="true" form="prefix">lim</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">→<!-- → --></mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞<!-- ∞ --></mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:munder> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">{\lim _{x \to + \infty }}f(x)/{x^r} = c</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>.
Let M = 〈M, <, …〉 be alinearly ordered structure. We define M to be o-minimal if every definable subset of M is a finite union of intervals. Classical examples … Let M = 〈M, <, …〉 be alinearly ordered structure. We define M to be o-minimal if every definable subset of M is a finite union of intervals. Classical examples are ordered divisible abelian groups and real closed fields. We prove a trichotomy theorem for the structure that an arbitraryo-minimal M can induce on a neighbourhood of any a in M. Roughly said, one of the following holds: (i) a is trivial (technical term), or (ii) a has a convex neighbourhood on which M induces the structure of an ordered vector space, or (iii) a is contained in an open interval on which M induces the structure of an expansion of a real closed field. The proof uses 'geometric calculus' which allows one to recover a differentiable structure by purely geometric methods. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification: primary 03C45; secondary 03C52, 12J15, 14P10.
A $k$-ary semi-algebraic relation $E$ on $\mathbb {R}^d$ is a subset of $\mathbb {R}^{kd}$, the set of $k$-tuples of points in $\mathbb {R}^d$, which is determined by a finite number … A $k$-ary semi-algebraic relation $E$ on $\mathbb {R}^d$ is a subset of $\mathbb {R}^{kd}$, the set of $k$-tuples of points in $\mathbb {R}^d$, which is determined by a finite number of polynomial inequalities in $kd$ real variables. The description complexity of such a relation is at most $t$ if $d,k \leq t$ and the number of polynomials and their degrees are all bounded by $t$. A set $A\subset \mathbb {R}^d$ is called homogeneous if all or none of the $k$-tuples from $A$ satisfy $E$. A large number of geometric Ramsey-type problems and results can be formulated as questions about finding large homogeneous subsets of sets in $\mathbb {R}^d$ equipped with semi-algebraic relations. In this paper, we study Ramsey numbers for $k$-ary semi-algebraic relations of bounded complexity and give matching upper and lower bounds, showing that they grow as a tower of height $k-1$. This improves upon a direct application of Ramsey's theorem by one exponential and extends a result of Alon, Pach, Pinchasi, Radoičić, and Sharir, who proved this for $k=2$. We apply our results to obtain new estimates for some geometric Ramsey-type problems relating to order types and one-sided sets of hyperplanes. We also study the off-diagonal case, achieving some partial results.
By a variety, we mean a class of structures in some language containing only function symbols which is equationally defined or equivalently is closed under homomorphisms, submodels and products. If … By a variety, we mean a class of structures in some language containing only function symbols which is equationally defined or equivalently is closed under homomorphisms, submodels and products. If K is a class of -structures then I ( K , λ) denotes the number of nonisomorphic models in K of cardinality λ. When we say that K has few models, we mean that I ( K ,λ) &lt; 2 λ for some λ &gt; ∣ ∣. If I ( K ,λ) = 2 λ for all λ &gt; ∣ ∣, then we say K has many models. In [9] and [10], Shelah has shown that for an elementary class K , having few models is a strong structural condition.
Let 〈R, >,+,⋅〉 be a real closed field, and let M be an o-minimal expansion of R. We prove here several results regarding rings and groups which are definable in … Let 〈R, >,+,⋅〉 be a real closed field, and let M be an o-minimal expansion of R. We prove here several results regarding rings and groups which are definable in M. We show that every M–definable ring without zero divisors is definably isomorphic to R, R(√(−l)) or the ring of quaternions over R. One corollary is that no model of Texp is interpretable in a model of Tan.
In this paper we formulate a notion similar to o -minimality but appropriate for the p -adics. The paper is in a sense a sequel to [11] and [5]. In … In this paper we formulate a notion similar to o -minimality but appropriate for the p -adics. The paper is in a sense a sequel to [11] and [5]. In [11] a notion of minimality was formulated, as follows. Suppose that L, L + are first-order languages and + is an L + -structure whose reduct to L is . Then + is said to be -minimal if, for every N + elementarily equivalent to + , every parameterdefinable subset of its domain N + is definable with parameters by a quantifier-free L -formula. Observe that if L has a single binary relation which in is interpreted by a total order on M , then we have just the notion of strong o-minimality , from [13]; and by a theorem from [6], strong o -minimality is equivalent to o -minimality. If L has no relations, functions, or constants (other than equality) then the notion is just strong minimality . In [11], -minimality is investigated for a number of structures . In particular, the C-relation of [1] was considered, in place of the total order in the definition of strong o -minimality. The C -relation is essentially the ternary relation which naturally holds on the maximal chains of a sufficiently nice tree; see [1], [11] or [5] for more detail, and for axioms. Much of the motivation came from the observation that a C -relation on a field F which is preserved by the affine group AGL(1, F ) (consisting of permutations ( a,b ) : x ↦ ax + b , where a ∈ F \ {0} and b ∈ F ) is the same as a non-trivial valuation: to get a C -relation from a valuation ν, put C ( x;y,z ) if and only if ν( y − x ) &lt; ν( y − z ).
By a variety, we mean a class of structures in some language containing only function symbols which is equationally defined or equivalently is closed under homomorphisms, submodels and products. If … By a variety, we mean a class of structures in some language containing only function symbols which is equationally defined or equivalently is closed under homomorphisms, submodels and products. If K is a class of -structures then I(K, λ) denotes the number of nonisomorphic models in K of cardinality λ. When we say that K has few models, we mean that I(K,λ) &lt; 2λ for some λ &gt; ∣∣. If I(K,λ) = 2λ for all λ &gt; ∣∣, then we say K has many models. In [9] and [10], Shelah has shown that for an elementary class K, having few models is a strong structural condition.
The notion of an analytic-geometric category was introduced by v. d. Dries and Miller in [Lou van den Dries and Chris Miller, Geometric categories and o-minimal structures, Duke Math. J. … The notion of an analytic-geometric category was introduced by v. d. Dries and Miller in [Lou van den Dries and Chris Miller, Geometric categories and o-minimal structures, Duke Math. J. 84 (1996), no. 2, 497–540.]. It is a category of subsets of real analytic manifolds which extends the category of subanalytic sets. This paper discusses connections between the subanalytic category, or more generally analytic-geometric categories, and complex analytic geometry. The questions are of the following nature: We start with a subset A of a complex analytic manifold M and assume that A is an object of an analytic-geometric category (by viewing M as a real analytic manifold of double dimension). We then formulate conditions under which A, its closure or its image under a holomorphic map is a complex analytic set.
The brilliant work of Ax-Kochen [1], [2], [3] and Ersov [6], and later work by Kochen [7] have made clear very striking resemblances between real closed fields and p -adically … The brilliant work of Ax-Kochen [1], [2], [3] and Ersov [6], and later work by Kochen [7] have made clear very striking resemblances between real closed fields and p -adically closed fields, from the model-theoretical point of view. Cohen [5], from a standpoint less model-theoretic, also contributed much to this analogy. In this paper we shall point out a feature of all the above treatments which obscures one important resemblance between real and p -adic fields. We shall outline a new treatment of the p -adic case (not far removed from the classical treatments cited above), and establish an new analogy between real closed and p -adically closed fields. We want to describe the definable subsets of p -adically closed fields. Tarski [9] in his pioneering work described the first-order definable subsets of real closed fields. Namely, if K is a real-closed field and X is a subset of K first-order definable on K using parameters from K then X is a finite union of nonoverlapping intervals (open, closed, half-open, empty or all of K ). In particular, if X is infinite, X has nonempty interior. Now, there is an analogous question for p -adically closed fields. If K is p -adically closed, what are the definable subsets of K ? To the best of our knowledge, this question has not been answered until now. What is the difference between the two cases? Tarski's analysis rests on elimination of quantifiers for real closed fields. Elimination of quantifiers for p -adically closed fields has been achieved [3], but only when we take a cross-section π as part of our basic data. The problem is that in the presence of π it becomes very difficult to figure out what sort of set is definable by a quantifier free formula. We shall see later that use of the cross-section increases the class of definable sets.
We note a parallel between some ideas of stable model theory and certain topics in finite combinatorics related to the sum-product phenomenon. For a simple linear group <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math … We note a parallel between some ideas of stable model theory and certain topics in finite combinatorics related to the sum-product phenomenon. For a simple linear group <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>, we show that a finite subset <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper X"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">X</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> with <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="StartAbsoluteValue upper X upper X Superscript negative 1 Baseline upper X EndAbsoluteValue slash StartAbsoluteValue upper X EndAbsoluteValue"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo>−<!-- − --></mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">|X X ^{-1}X |/ |X|</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> bounded is close to a finite subgroup, or else to a subset of a proper algebraic subgroup of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. We also find a connection with Lie groups, and use it to obtain some consequences suggestive of topological nilpotence. Model-theoretically we prove the independence theorem and the stabilizer theorem in a general first-order setting.
This book is a modern introduction to model theory which stresses applications to algebra throughout the text. The first half of the book includes classical material on model construction techniques, … This book is a modern introduction to model theory which stresses applications to algebra throughout the text. The first half of the book includes classical material on model construction techniques, type spaces, prime models, saturated models, countable models, and indiscernibles and their applications. The author also includes an introduction to stability theory beginning with Morley's Categoricity Theorem and concentrating on omega-stable theories. One significant aspect of this text is the inclusion of chapters on important topics not covered in other introductory texts, such as omega-stable groups and the geometry of strongly minimal sets. The author then goes on to illustrate how these ingredients are used in Hrushovski's applications to diophantine geometry. David Marker is Professor of Mathematics at the University of Illinois at Chicago. His main area of research involves mathematical logic and model theory, and their applications to algebra and geometry. This book was developed from a series of lectures given by the author at the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute in 1998.
We consider an arbitrary topological group G definable in a structure \mathcal M , such that some basis for the topology of G consists of sets definable in \mathcal M … We consider an arbitrary topological group G definable in a structure \mathcal M , such that some basis for the topology of G consists of sets definable in \mathcal M . To each such group G we associate a compact G -space of partial types, S^{\mu}_G(M)=\{p_{\mu}\colon p\in S_G(M)\} which is the quotient of the usual type space S_G(M) by the relation of two types being "infinitesimally close to each other". In the o-minimal setting, if p is a definable type then it has a corresponding definable subgroup Stab ^{\mu}(p) , which is the stabilizer of p_{\mu} . This group is nontrivial when p is unbounded in the sense of \mathcal M ; in fact it is a torsion-free solvable group. Along the way, we analyze the general construction of S^{\mu}_G(M) and its connection to the Samuel compactification of topological groups.
A bipartite graph G is semi-algebraic in \mathbb{R}^d if its vertices are represented by point sets P,Q \subset \mathbb{R}^d and its edges are defined as pairs of points (p,q) \in … A bipartite graph G is semi-algebraic in \mathbb{R}^d if its vertices are represented by point sets P,Q \subset \mathbb{R}^d and its edges are defined as pairs of points (p,q) \in P \times Q that satisfy a Boolean combination of a fixed number of polynomial equations and inequalities in 2d coordinates. We show that for fixed k , the maximum number of edges in a K_{k,k} -free semi-algebraic bipartite graph G = (P,Q,E) in \mathbb{R}^2 with |P| = m and |Q| = n is at most O((mn)^{2/3} + m + n) , and this bound is tight. In dimensions d \geq 3 , we show that all such semi-algebraic graphs have at most C\left((mn)^{ \frac{d}{d+1} + \epsilon} + m + n\right) edges, where here \epsilon is an arbitrarily small constant and C = C(d,k,t,\epsilon) . This result is a far-reaching generalization of the classical Szemerédi-Trotter incidence theorem. The proof combines tools from several fields: VC-dimension and shatter functions, polynomial partitioning, and Hilbert polynomials. We also present various applications of our theorem. For example, a general point-variety incidence bound in \mathbb R^d , an improved bound for a d -dimensional variant of the Erdös unit distances problem, and more.
In this paper we extend two theorems from [2] on p-adic subanalytic sets, where p is a fixed prime number, Qp is the field of p-adic numbers and Zp is … In this paper we extend two theorems from [2] on p-adic subanalytic sets, where p is a fixed prime number, Qp is the field of p-adic numbers and Zp is the ring of p-adic integers. One of these theorems [2, 3.32] says that each subanalytic subset of Zp is semialgebraic. This is extended here as follows.
We develop a "motivic integration" version of the Poisson summation formula for function fields, with values in the Grothendieck ring of definable exponential sums.We also study division algebras over the … We develop a "motivic integration" version of the Poisson summation formula for function fields, with values in the Grothendieck ring of definable exponential sums.We also study division algebras over the function field, and obtain relations among the motivic Fourier transforms of a test function at different completions.We use these to prove, in a special case, a motivic version of a theorem of [DKV].
Let F∈C[x,y,z] be a constant-degree polynomial, and let A,B,C⊂C be finite sets of size n. We show that F vanishes on at most O(n11/6) points of the Cartesian product A×B×C, … Let F∈C[x,y,z] be a constant-degree polynomial, and let A,B,C⊂C be finite sets of size n. We show that F vanishes on at most O(n11/6) points of the Cartesian product A×B×C, unless F has a special group-related form. This improves a theorem of Elekes and Szabó and generalizes a result of Raz, Sharir, and Solymosi. The same statement holds over R, and a similar statement holds when A,B,C have different sizes (with a more involved bound replacing O(n11/6)). This result provides a unified tool for improving bounds in various Erdős-type problems in combinatorial geometry, and we discuss several applications of this kind.
Conventions and notation background material from algebraic geometry general notions associated with algebraic groups homogeneous spaces solvable groups Borel subgroups reductive groups rationality questions. Conventions and notation background material from algebraic geometry general notions associated with algebraic groups homogeneous spaces solvable groups Borel subgroups reductive groups rationality questions.
numbers with exponentiation is model complete. When we combine this with Hovanskii's finiteness theorem [9], it follows that the real exponential field is o-minimal. In o-minimal expansions of the real … numbers with exponentiation is model complete. When we combine this with Hovanskii's finiteness theorem [9], it follows that the real exponential field is o-minimal. In o-minimal expansions of the real field the definable subsets of R' share many of the nice structural properties of semialgebraic sets. For example, definable subsets have only finitely many connected components, definable sets can be stratified and triangulated, and continuous definable maps are piecewise trivial (see [5]). In this paper we will prove a quantifier elimination result for the real field augmented by exponentiation and all restricted analytic functions, and use this result to obtain o-minimality. We were led to this while studying work of Ressayre [13] and several of his ideas emerge here in simplified form. However, our treatment is formally independent of the results of [16], [17], [9], and [13].
Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="German upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathfrak {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be an o-minimal expansion of a divisible ordered abelian group … Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="German upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathfrak {R}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be an o-minimal expansion of a divisible ordered abelian group <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="left-parenthesis upper R comma greater-than comma plus comma 0 comma 1 right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">(R,&gt;,+,0,1)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> with a distinguished positive element <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="1"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">1</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. Then the following dichotomy holds: Either there is a <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable binary operation <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="dot"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\cdot</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> such that <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="left-parenthesis upper R comma greater-than comma plus comma dot comma 0 comma 1 right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">(R,&gt;,+,\cdot ,0,1)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is an ordered real closed field; or, for every definable function <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="f colon upper R right-arrow upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>:</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">f:R\to R</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> there exists a <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="lamda element-of StartSet 0 EndSet union upper A u t left-parenthesis upper R comma plus right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">{</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">}</mml:mo> <mml:mo>∪</mml:mo> <mml:mi>Aut</mml:mi> <mml:mo>⁡</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\lambda \in \{0\}\cup \operatorname {Aut}(R,+)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> with <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="limit Underscript x right-arrow plus normal infinity Endscripts left-bracket f left-parenthesis x right-parenthesis minus lamda left-parenthesis x right-parenthesis right-bracket element-of upper R"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:munder> <mml:mo movablelimits="true" form="prefix">lim</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:munder> <mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\lim _{x\to +\infty }[f(x)-\lambda (x)]\in R</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. This has some interesting consequences regarding groups definable in o-minimal structures. In particular, for an o-minimal structure <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="German upper M colon equals left-parenthesis upper M comma greater-than comma ellipsis right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>:=</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo>…</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathfrak {M}:=(M,&gt;,\dots )</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> there are, up to definable isomorphism, at most two continuous (with respect to the product topology induced by the order) <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="German upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathfrak {M}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-definable groups with underlying set <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper M"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">M</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>.
We show that a class of subsets of a structure uniformly definable by a first-order formula is a Vapnik-Chervonenkis class if and only if the formula does not have the … We show that a class of subsets of a structure uniformly definable by a first-order formula is a Vapnik-Chervonenkis class if and only if the formula does not have the independence property. Via this connection we obtain several new examples of Vapnik-Chervonenkis classes, including sets of positivity of finitely subanalytic functions.