SU\G(š”ø)/KĀ·U
Sign Up for free Log In

Author Description

Login to generate an author description

Ask a Question About This Mathematician

Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values

2022-10-28
Mohammad Hosseini , Enric Senabre Hidalgo , Serge P. J. M. Horbach +2 more
Although adherence to Mertonian values of science (i.e., communism, universalism, organized skepticism, disinterestedness) is desired and promoted in academia, such adherence can cause friction with the normative structures and practices ā€¦ Although adherence to Mertonian values of science (i.e., communism, universalism, organized skepticism, disinterestedness) is desired and promoted in academia, such adherence can cause friction with the normative structures and practices of Open Science. Mertonian values and Open Science practices aim to improve the conduct and communication of research and are promoted by institutional actors. However, Mertonian values remain mostly idealistic and contextualized in local and disciplinary cultures and Open Science practices rely heavily on third-party resources and technology that are not equally accessible to all parties. Furthermore, although still popular, Mertonian values were developed in a different institutional and political context. In this article, we argue that new normative structures for science need to look beyond nostalgia and consider aspirations and outcomes of Open Science practices. To contribute to such a vision, we explore the intersection of several Open Science practices with Mertonian values to flesh out challenges involved in upholding these values. We demonstrate that this intersection becomes complicated when the interests of numerous groups collide and contrast. Acknowledging and exploring such tensions informs our understanding of researchers' behavior and supports efforts that seek to improve researchers' interactions with other normative structures such as research ethics and integrity frameworks.
View PDF Chat

A BLUEPRINT FOR MEASURING PROGRAMME OUTCOMES

2013-04-01
Satesh Namasivayam , Mushtak Alā€Atabi , Chien Hwa Chong +3 more

Messing with Merton: The intersection between Open Science practices and Mertonian values

2022-09-15
Mohammad Hosseini , Enric Senabre Hidalgo , Serge P. J. M. Horbach +2 more
Although adherence to Mertonian values of science (i.e., communism, universalism, organized skepticism, disinterestedness) is desired and promoted in academia, such adherence can cause friction with the normative structures and practices ā€¦ Although adherence to Mertonian values of science (i.e., communism, universalism, organized skepticism, disinterestedness) is desired and promoted in academia, such adherence can cause friction with the normative structures and practices of Open Science. Mertonian values and Open Science practices aim to improve the conduct and communication of research and are promoted by institutional actors. However, Mertonian values remain mostly idealistic and contextualized in local and disciplinary cultures and Open Science practices rely heavily on third-party resources and technology that are not equally accessible to all parties. Furthermore, although still popular, Mertonian values were developed in a different institutional and political context. In this article, we argue that new normative structures for science need to look beyond nostalgia and consider aspirations and outcomes of Open Science practices. To contribute to such a vision, we explore the intersection of several Open Science practices with Mertonian values to flesh out challenges involved in upholding these values. We demonstrate that this intersection becomes complicated when the interests of numerous groups collide and contrast. Acknowledging and exploring such tensions informs our understanding of researchersā€™ behavior and supports efforts that seek to improve researchersā€™ interactions with other normative structures such as research ethics and integrity frameworks.
View PDF Chat

GREI Data Repository AI Taxonomy

2024-11-07
John Chodacki , Mark Hanhel , Stefano M. Iacus +5 more
The Generalist Repository Ecosystem Initiative (GREI), funded by the NIH, developed an AI taxonomy tailored to data repository roles to guide AI integration across repository management. It categorizes the roles ā€¦ The Generalist Repository Ecosystem Initiative (GREI), funded by the NIH, developed an AI taxonomy tailored to data repository roles to guide AI integration across repository management. It categorizes the roles into stages, including acquisition, validation, organization, enhancement, analysis, sharing, and user support, providing a structured framework for implementing AI in repository workflows.
View PDF Chat

GREI Data Repository AI Taxonomy

2024-11-07
John Chodacki , Mark Hanhel , Stefano M. Iacus +5 more
The Generalist Repository Ecosystem Initiative (GREI), funded by the NIH, developed an AI taxonomy tailored to data repository roles to guide AI integration across repository management. It categorizes the roles ā€¦ The Generalist Repository Ecosystem Initiative (GREI), funded by the NIH, developed an AI taxonomy tailored to data repository roles to guide AI integration across repository management. It categorizes the roles into stages, including acquisition, validation, organization, enhancement, analysis, sharing, and user support, providing a structured framework for implementing AI in repository workflows.
View PDF Chat

Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values

2022-10-28
Mohammad Hosseini , Enric Senabre Hidalgo , Serge P. J. M. Horbach +2 more
Although adherence to Mertonian values of science (i.e., communism, universalism, organized skepticism, disinterestedness) is desired and promoted in academia, such adherence can cause friction with the normative structures and practices ā€¦ Although adherence to Mertonian values of science (i.e., communism, universalism, organized skepticism, disinterestedness) is desired and promoted in academia, such adherence can cause friction with the normative structures and practices of Open Science. Mertonian values and Open Science practices aim to improve the conduct and communication of research and are promoted by institutional actors. However, Mertonian values remain mostly idealistic and contextualized in local and disciplinary cultures and Open Science practices rely heavily on third-party resources and technology that are not equally accessible to all parties. Furthermore, although still popular, Mertonian values were developed in a different institutional and political context. In this article, we argue that new normative structures for science need to look beyond nostalgia and consider aspirations and outcomes of Open Science practices. To contribute to such a vision, we explore the intersection of several Open Science practices with Mertonian values to flesh out challenges involved in upholding these values. We demonstrate that this intersection becomes complicated when the interests of numerous groups collide and contrast. Acknowledging and exploring such tensions informs our understanding of researchers' behavior and supports efforts that seek to improve researchers' interactions with other normative structures such as research ethics and integrity frameworks.
View PDF Chat

Messing with Merton: The intersection between Open Science practices and Mertonian values

2022-09-15
Mohammad Hosseini , Enric Senabre Hidalgo , Serge P. J. M. Horbach +2 more
Although adherence to Mertonian values of science (i.e., communism, universalism, organized skepticism, disinterestedness) is desired and promoted in academia, such adherence can cause friction with the normative structures and practices ā€¦ Although adherence to Mertonian values of science (i.e., communism, universalism, organized skepticism, disinterestedness) is desired and promoted in academia, such adherence can cause friction with the normative structures and practices of Open Science. Mertonian values and Open Science practices aim to improve the conduct and communication of research and are promoted by institutional actors. However, Mertonian values remain mostly idealistic and contextualized in local and disciplinary cultures and Open Science practices rely heavily on third-party resources and technology that are not equally accessible to all parties. Furthermore, although still popular, Mertonian values were developed in a different institutional and political context. In this article, we argue that new normative structures for science need to look beyond nostalgia and consider aspirations and outcomes of Open Science practices. To contribute to such a vision, we explore the intersection of several Open Science practices with Mertonian values to flesh out challenges involved in upholding these values. We demonstrate that this intersection becomes complicated when the interests of numerous groups collide and contrast. Acknowledging and exploring such tensions informs our understanding of researchersā€™ behavior and supports efforts that seek to improve researchersā€™ interactions with other normative structures such as research ethics and integrity frameworks.
View PDF Chat

A BLUEPRINT FOR MEASURING PROGRAMME OUTCOMES

2013-04-01
Satesh Namasivayam , Mushtak Alā€Atabi , Chien Hwa Chong +3 more
Coauthor Papers Together
Stephan GĆ¼ttinger 2
Enric Senabre Hidalgo 2
Serge P. J. M. Horbach 2
Bart Penders 2
Mushtak Alā€Atabi 1
Satesh Namasivayam 1
Stefano M. Iacus 1
Nici Pfeiffer 1
Eric L Olson 1
Kristi Holmes 1
Chien Hwa Chong 1
Ryan Scherle 1
Mark Hanhel 1
F. Choong 1
Reynato Andal Gamboa 1
John Chodacki 1